Bad Publicity, BBB Complaints Causing AT&T To Reconsider Metered Broadband?
from the people-speak-up dept
In the US, there's been an ongoing battle by a bunch of ISPs who want to implement metered broadband as a way to increase revenue. While they've been spinning this as getting heavy users to "pay their fair share" you'll note they never promote any plans to drop prices for the person who barely uses their internet connection. But one thing that has become pretty clear is that consumers absolutely hate metered broadband -- not just because it can increase fees, but because it changes the way they use the internet. Rather than being free to just use it and experiment, suddenly you need to keep track of all that usage (without any kind of reliable meter). This introduces amazingly annoying transaction costs that lead people to just not want to use the internet as much -- decreasing the value of the connection, even as the price is increasing.A year ago, after a ton of bad publicity around metered billing, Time Warner Cable backed off plans to implement it on a widespread basis, and now it looks like AT&T may be recognizing the same thing. AT&T, of course, has been running a few small scale tests, and it's been pissing people off so much that they've been complaining to the Better Business Bureau, which isn't making AT&T happy. For now, the company has stopped signing new customers up for the metered trials and has said that the "experiment" will end on April 1. Whether or not the experiment ending means no more metered broadband... or more widespread metered broadband, remains to be seen. But large number of complaints being filed should make AT&T think twice before deciding to roll this out further.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: complaints, metered broadband
Companies: at&t, bbb, time warner cable
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
er..
Much as I agree with most things you post, Mike, this is a crock of proverbial. I live in a country (Australia) where one ISP (Telstra, our equivalent of the hicks in "Deliverance") calls shaped plans unlimited (I kid you not) and we don't actually have unlimited plans, so I really have no sympathy for the AT&T customers. Caps ranging from 20 to 150Gb ? You guys probably don't have peak/off peak either... and yet still complaining. For the record when I signed up with my ISP 18 months ago, I got a 15Gb cap - 5Gb between 6p and 6a, then 10 between 6a and 6p.
Based on the first paragraph of the second link in the story posted in the last day: (it even uses the word nightmare .. jeez)
"Last April Last April Time Warner Cable shelved.. AT&T quietly continued to experiment with metered billing"
"Last April" was just on 11 months ago now.
Sorry for being ranty but this is seriously a non-story except for those who want to download the internet .. If an average user can't cope with 20Gb, I don't feel at all sorry for them.
Anyone want to tell me the volume of data they took in last month just for a comparison ?
Myself in the last month have gone through 37Gb, of which just under 30 was (legit) digital downloads. I've done quite a bit of surfing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: er..
"If an average user can't cope with 20Gb, I don't feel at all sorry for them."
20Gb is nothing if you want to do any kind of video streaming.
I use about 80Gb/month. Most of it legal. I don't have cable and use Hulu and the network sites to watch most tv shows.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: er..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: er..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: er..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: er..
20GB a month... SHEESH. I'd move to japan the next day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: er..
Including non-necessities, like games downloaded from Steam, I'd say I surpassed 40gigs in the month. And once again, that's not even including regular web surfing, streaming, etc. Or that I'm on a shared home network, so I'm not even the only one using the internet.
And sometimes it's not even a matter of "I could put off this download for a month". When I'm working on large projects with groups, using SVN or the like, I'm constantly downloading and uploading a large amount of data. Suddenly finding myself at some arbitrary limit in the middle of work is simply unacceptable.
Capped limits are simply too awkward for anything. They don't account for monthly variations (which there ALWAYS is), and no one wants to be phoning up their ISP every month to get their limit moved up and down. Even if my internet usage was completely optional, I sure as hell don't want to be writing down the amount that I download (including each website hit) to keep track of my usage. Nor do I want to keep pestering everyone else on my network to keep track of theirs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: er..
Eff meters and eff the companies trying to implement them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: er..
I know exactly what you mean. Just the large datasets I move around go over 400-500 gig a month. Throw in everything else and I am at 600+ gig a month. If metered broad band were implemented I would be complaining to the BBB after every phone call to my service provider. I would make sure I made a ton of calls to complain ... :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: er..
Eff meters and eff the companies trying to implement them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: er..
I think from old times were: Peak 12pm to 2am, Off Peak 2am to 12pm.
Though with the new 'account upgrade' they are changed to: Peak 8am to 2am, Off peak 2am to 8am.
So only 6 hours to use up your off peak 30GB.
Looks like it is timed to leave things to download overnight.
(It might be worth noting that for the bigger plans the 'off peak' time is extended I think)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: er..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: er..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: er..Bullshite
Anyone want to tell me the volume of data they took in last month just for a comparison ?
Myself in the last month have gone through 37Gb, of which just under 30 was (legit) digital downloads. I've done quite a bit of surfing."
Yeah, well, you see, thats bullshit. Straight out. I have netflix streaming and ROUTINELY go WELL over 20gb a month, and that doesnt even count my normal surfing, music listening, youtube, etc all of which take a fair amount of bandwidth. Then there is the Xbox gaming, which is frequent and also the download packs. Now, I might not be the "average" user here, but with things like Netflix streaming and other streaming services becoming more mainstream, it wont take even an "average" user very long to hit a ridiculously low cap like 5 or 20gb in a MONTHS time.
Sorry you live in the Down Under where your internet sucks just about the worst in the world, but the rest of us 2+billion people with internet service dont. We expect better, we pay for it, and it is expected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Yeebok
China filters the internet for all users in the country. So I guess we shouldn't complain if the US puts up a slightly less restrictive filter right? Just because one country has restrictive policies doesn't mean another should adopt them.
"Sorry for being ranty but this is seriously a non-story except for those who want to download the internet .. If an average user can't cope with 20Gb, I don't feel at all sorry for them."
You're used to being extremely limited (in comparison) by what you can do on the internet. 20GB/month just won't cut it for anyone I know. With services like Netflix, Youtube, Hulu, and even the streaming content from the source (NBC, ABC, etc) an average household will exceed this limit very quickly. Just imagine if the household has a gamer who plays on PC and XBox 360. Game demos on XBox Live, DLC, digital distribution (Steam, Direct2Driver), etc would obliterate a 20GB limit.
Bandwidth is not a resource like oil, gas, water, or electricity. If you use up all available bandwidth in one 24 hour period it doesn't affect the bandwidth that will be available immediately following that period (assuming you don't overload and permanently damage some router.) By capping users and charging more they are just trying to get more money without improving their services or innovating. This is a step backward, even if Australia disagrees.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Yeebok
As a personal input, I have a lively amount of internet use going in my house - streaming last.fm, watching videos, playing xbox live, and I am currently on an iinet 30gb + 30gb plan (adsl2+). before the upgrade they recently made, it was 12+20 (i think), and I was regularly running over my cap. So the whole '20gb is enough' is denifitely incorrect.
Add to this the fact that over xbox live you can now stream/download movies in HD, with file sizes ranging from 1 or 2 to 11 or 12gb, and you can see why these types of limits dont make sense, and are holding back development of internet technologies in my view.
Why would you bother paying for developing a system of IP streaming/movies on demand/and bandwidth intensive application in Australia when people arent goign to use it because their internet just cannot handle it? Get rid of broadband caps (or at least greatly increase them), and I think you would see a lot more adoption of media of internet in Australia.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Yeebok
AAPT's unlimited plan is only unlimited in an offpeak period. The peak time has a 20G limit. Anecdotally (not factually) they throttle data types and running any sort of server will get you booted.
iiNet's ADSL1 limits (my exchange sucks) were lower than ADSL2 'til the last upgrade which I think (for me) tripled my peak to 30, and doubled my off to 30 - I rarely go near those limits though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Yeebok
You're making Australia almost sound worse than China. I'm already frustrated enough with US duopolies that I'm trying to form a wireless cooperative in my neighborhood, just as a way around them. If I was limited to the crappy ISP options you're dealing with, I would be fomenting outright revolt by now. Do you have a right to bear arms in Australia? That's the main reason I support the Second Amendment right to bear arms in the U.S. -- it's a natural way of enforcing the First Amendment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Yeebok
For the record, AAPT has released a fully unlimited plan 24 hours a day, which is only marginally more expensive than your current plan, but which includes phone line rental and unlimited music streaming and $50 credit per month in the EMI music store. That is what Tim was talking about. You might want to check it out.
And finally, this is predominantly an American site, and they're talking about AT&T, which is in a land where unmetered plans are the norm. The issue is that people were signed up on an unmetered plan, and then switched over from the unmetered plan onto a metered plan without being asked. That's the issue.
Whether you have any sympathy for them or not is really quite irrelevant. Australia is not the benchmark when it comes to internet quotas. I find it interesting that you've managed to make a story about shady practices by AT&T into a whinge about how you're so hard done by. Whinging about how other people use their internet connections and suggesting that they shouldn't download more than you is just that - whinging. Just because you can't envision how many people use online video streaming services like Hulu and Netflix, doesn't mean that the rest of the world doesn't. In the US, catching up on TV on Hulu is the norm. I've stopped watching much of my television in Australia on the television - the online services from the networks are starting to become much more convenient. I have an unlimted internet plan in Australia and I don't have to worry about what I do or don't download. I just enjoy the internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Electricity Too
Same thing with electricity. Get rid of the meters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Electricity Too
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Electricity Too
Better a smart-ass than a dumb-ass. You should try it.
"Bandwidth is NOT a scarce resource like electricity"
And just where is this source of infinite bandwidth, dumb-ass?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Electricity Too
Interesting sarcasm. But it is a terrible analogy.
Does the electric utility send unwanted advertising to your toaster in the morning?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Electricity Too
What sarcasm? Sounds like a good idea to me. I'm sure our bills would all go down.
But it is a terrible analogy.
It wasn't really meant as an analogy.
Does the electric utility send unwanted advertising to your toaster in the morning?
No, they usually cram it in my monthly bill, while at the same time my ISP has never spammed me. But what relevance does that have, anyway?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Time to move Ethel...
So Wal-Mart versus the Cap. Let's see who blinks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
South Africa
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
South Africa
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Same old game
There was a time when phone calls were flat rate in your area code, then they began charging to call outside your area code, then they began charging based on distance.
Wireless and VoIP took the bite out of long distance charges, but then some VoIP providers learned from Telecom that they could charge for long distance and consumers would just accept it.
Its interesting that consumers are not accepting this mentality when it comes to broadband. It's probably a good thing that consumers are taking a stand, since that broadband pipe is the key to VoIP and IPTV. Giving in to metering now will seriously affect the pricing for those other services.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
April fools!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This kills internet TV
Where can I complain about ATT? It's clear we need more competition in the market place. Force the broadband companies to share their lines!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Australian ISPs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Metering for the rest of us...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Metering for the rest of us...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Possibly, they lost a significant quantity of paying customers and that is why they dropped the test.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Metered Would Affect other Businesses
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Interesting
When did you start filtering comments?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Americans waste more bandwidth per person than any other nation in the world!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Americans waste more bandwidth per person than any other nation in the world!
You need to work on the finesse
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Metered
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It means it didn't work this time. Now it's time to join hands with Time Warner and start the next wave. But wait, there is more, they have to find the right politicians to pass new laws, Time warner has done it and keep adding new things all the time whether you like it or not. But wait there is more, why don't they call Microsoft and get tips on how to screw people with a smile. Time Warner backed off, but also canceled all upgrades planed for this year to areas where they had no competition, AT&T will do similar things, bye bye U-verse.But wait there is more, why don't they do it, we complain, blog and and curse them while we write that big fat check every month.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mr. Australia thinks 20gb a month os more than reasonable??? LOLOLOL
I just downloaded Neploian: total War, one of the latest games released on Steam today, and THAT ALONE was nearly
21 GIGS in size. ALONE!!
I purchased a few more games today, plus several preorders in the last several days. Just so Mr. australia thinks I'm 'spending too much money while there are people starving in the world, and I should give my money to them instead', which is what many enjoy saying, it's MY MONEY, MY GAMES, MY INTERNET CONNECTION, MY EVERYTHING!!
I could EASILY use 100 GIGS in a day watching streaming content, and that's just me alone. And i earn every cent of what I use too. And I keep computers running for everyone else in the house, plus relatives, family friends, etc. too.
I doupt 1 TERRABYTE per month would be enough. And guess what? My ISP understands this (I talked with them before signing up), Verizon FIOS. They would not DARE even CONTEMPLATE bandwidth caps, and if they tried, they would lslose me so fast they would not believe it.
(Yes, I CREATE content too, I'm a programmer along with everything else.)
Also, don't forget Internet radio, etc., and you getthe picture. Bandwidth caps are the stupidest idea ever, as is shaping to disable BitTorrent. I use BT for 100% LEGAL purposes more times than even I believe, and trying to cencoranything would just drive me, and everyone else I know, away!!
What do you think of that, Mr. Australia?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sorry for spelling errors in my above post
I was typing real fast to get my ideas out, sorry for saying 'doupt' instead of 'doubt', etc.
I'm very professional, but i also think very fast.
I hope my posts give you my 2 cents worth.
Gino
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sorry for spelling errors in my above post
I was typing real fast to get my ideas out, sorry for saying 'doupt' instead of 'doubt', etc.
I'm very professional, but i also think very fast.
I hope my posts give you my 2 cents worth.
Gino
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sorry for spelling errors in my above post
I was typing real fast to get my ideas out, sorry for saying 'doupt' instead of 'doubt', etc.
I'm very professional, but i also think very fast.
I hope my posts give you my 2 cents worth.
Gino
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All of the things that people are mentioning (besides work stuff) are entertainment and a voluntary choice (legitimate, but voluntary). Someone who needs to move several hundred gigs a month for work should have some method in place from their employer.
Most of this bandwidth consumption stuff is either games, music, movies or similar.
Now go on, tell me how you -need- all this bandwidth now, and how if you don't download whatever item, you can't get it at a physical shop.
Absolutely facetiously, perhaps all the free bandwidth is the cause of the reputed obesity problem over there if all you do is sit on the net all day ;)
Gino, at no point did I claim to be 'Mr Australia' but if my posts make you think that of me, and you feel the need to advise me of that, perhaps I should let you know your post makes me think of you as a self obsessed juvenile.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The point of this is that you don't get to decide what reasonable uses for an internet connection are. The internet is open, and the benefit of the open internet is that it's so versatile - and it will be used in ways that you can't even imagine yet.
You are not the arbiter of what people do with their internet connections - therefore you are not the arbiter of how much bandwidth is reasonable.
Why do you feel the need to decide what other people should or should not be doing with their connection?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]