UCLA Decides To Put Course Videos Back Online; Countdown To Lawsuit Begins...
from the 3...-2...-1.... dept
Last month, we wrote about how the Association for Information Media and Equipment (AIME) had threatened UCLA with copyright violations for allowing professors to post videos online for students to view. This resulted in UCLA pulling down those videos -- even though the university said it believed it had a very strong fair use case. Since pulling down the videos, the two sides have been talking. However, even without an agreement, UCLA has decided to put the videos back online for the next quarter. Given this, I'm guessing that it won't be long before AIME files a lawsuit, so we might get an interesting case over fair use in educational settings...Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, education, fair use, ucla, videos
Companies: aime, ucla
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I'm confused as to why they can't do what ever class I had in college did, and just have organized screenings of the films for the class? Requiring students to buy 8 DVDs as the only alternative to streaming over the internet seems ludicrous.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Here's where the problem is:
"The message that UCLA sent AIME and all its members is that they and literally every other university have every right to buy a single copy of a video and stream it to an unlimited number of students forever without permission or compensation to the creator," said the association's counsel, Arnold P. Lutzker...
An industry spokeshole and an industry who employs him making willfully false, intellectually dishonest statements like this is an obvious attempt to reframe the debate. It changes the argument from "streaming to students for educational purposes" to "YouTube University". Fortunately, that kind of insane statement is more suited to a PR release than to a legal filing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is just an extortion attempt by yet another "Rights protection" racket... They will be the only beneficiary of any precedent setting settlement. Ultimately, if UCLA caves to this craven attempt to grab more money, this will set precedent for schools and universities across the nation to raise tuition and add yet another "media" fee to a death spiral of the cost of higher education.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
one copy per stream...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: one copy per stream...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@1st poster
YUP once again proving copyright doesnt help education and innovation
I hope they lose and more USA people get more stupid until your the barbarians of the world
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
don't forget sovereign immunity
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Of course, there is always a possibility, however remote, that a claim could be brought under the California Constitution on the basis of the state's equivalent to the 5th Amendment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Update: a lawsuit already began before I even created this thread :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
*UCLA has purchased legal copies of the media. At the request of an instructor, UCLA digitized the media and makes it available, via a video stream, to students enrolled in that instructors' course. The students must authenticate their identity via their unique student ID number. The authentication algorithm checks against the Registrar's records for enrollment for that class for that term. If the student is not enrolled in the class, they are denied access. The system used also creates a "dummy" link to the stream to prevent a student from sending the link to a friend. If they don't authenticate, they don't gain access to the stream.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]