Woman Spends $17,000 Of Her Own Money To Stop SEO From Being Trademarked
from the now-that's-a-trademark-hero dept
Stephanie Migot writes "Two years ago, the SEO community noticed that somebody they'd never heard of had begun the process of applying for a trademark for SEO (Search Engine Optimization). From the look of things, it was a bit of a power-grab to set standards for which businesses could and could not describe themselves as providing an SEO service.Naturally, the professionals were a bit alarmed, and at one point there were at least four different oppositions in the works. One by one, however, they all dropped out and it was left to a single individual, who paid the legal bills out of her own pocket, costing over $17,000, to get the application thrown out.
This never should have got that far. But what the story also shows is that the reason why so many dubious patents, copyrights and trademarks live on is because once the sound and fury has died down, there are very few who are willing to follow their opposition through to the end. Also, unless you keep a close eye on applications, it might be too late to take effective action before it's too late."
In some ways, it's even worse than Stephanie describes above -- because beyond being costly, it's often just an incredibly complex process to oppose a trademark or to try to invalidate a patent. The system is designed to focus on the approval process -- and not the opposition process.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Kickstarter
[ link to this | view in thread ]
>.>
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I wonder if I can trademark PPC? (joking)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
they have
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Huh.
I have no idea which dog I have in this fight.
Hrmm.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DMCA
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
She saved us from a proper loon
If he changes it in the future - it currently is a picture of a bleeding Jesus Christ on the cross with this quote:
John 15:18 "If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you."
Full congratulations to Rhea Drysdale for stopping it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
In fact, trademarks were established to prevent unfair competition, and the served the public policy goal of limiting or preventing confusion with respect to the origin of goods. Those purposes remain valuable.
Of course, as with ALL things, abuse can occur.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Another thing judges look at is which side initiated the lawsuit and which side tends to initiate the most lawsuits. Parties that initiate lawsuits also tend to keep judges employed and so judges tend to favor them.
Imagine if judges simply issued a summary judgment for all bogus lawsuits? It would greatly reduce the need for judges and many of them would lose their jobs as a result.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]