Are Overly Aggressive Trademark Lawyers Learning Not To Be Such Assholes All The Time?

from the maybe! dept

It's been just over 17 years since I coined the phrase "The Streisand Effect," which has totally taken on a life of its own. A key reason for naming it was to hopefully wake up overly aggressive lawyers to the fact that sending a nasty, threatening cease and desist letters to try to suppress information or stop someone from doing something wasn't a good idea. A few years later, a lawyer friend of mine mentioned that he thought that the concept of The Streisand Effect had done its job -- and that many, many corporate lawyers were much more averse to sending out such aggressive letters, recognizing that there might be a better approach. However, I still find it's pretty typical for many lawyers to immediately go for the the nasty threat letter, so it seemed like perhaps the lawyers hadn't quite gotten the message.

So... it's kind of a pleasant surprise to see how at least one large company -- and possibly a bunch of large companies -- handled the recent "drop" from the merry pranksters at MSCHF (who are no strangers to legal controversies). The new drop is the C&D Grand Prix, in which MSCHF was selling racecar-style shirts emblazoned with corporate logos from some of the biggest (and most legally aggressive in protecting their trademarks) brands out there:

People could buy each shirt, and then there was a special prize: anyone who bought the shirt of the "winner" of the Grand Prix would also get a MSCHF Grand Prix champion's hat. How could a company "win"? By being the first company, whose logoed shirt was for sale, to send MSCHF a cease and desist.

What's funny is that we had considered a remarkably similar idea at Techdirt many years ago (though a bit more focused on highlighting some absurdities of trademark law), but decided not to do it because we don't have a giant bank account like MSCHF does.

Of course, there were some big questions about how would the various companies respond, and, incredibly, none of the companies (as far as we can tell) actually freaked out about this and went ballistic. It's possible such letters are still coming. However, at least one of the companies prodded by the Grand Prix, Subway, actually took this all in good spirit. Very soon after MSCHF launched the Grand Prix, it tweeted "Two can play this game. Who's interested in this bad boy?" and posted an image of a Subway colored shirt, but with MSCHF's logo on the front:

Well played, Subway. Well, played.

Except, of course, to win the Grand Prix, someone had to send an actual cease and desist, and after a few users bugged Subway about it, the company complied:

The tweet says "You asked and you shall receive. Give the people hats @mschf." And the posted image says:

Dear MSCHF,

It is with great pleasure and a distinct honor to send this cease and desist to MSCHF INC. We didn't want to send this, we really didn't, but with free hats on the line, how could we not.

With that being said... stop using our logo or we'll sue you, lol. Now give the people free hats!

Strongly Worded Lawyer Sign-Off,
Subway

Now, obviously, this is joking, but it appears that MSCHF has accepted it as the winning entry in the Grand Prix.

Now, some may be slightly upset that this stunt didn't (yet?) provoke a "real" cease and desist letter, but I'm moderately happy with that fact, as it suggests that perhaps (maybe? really?) itchy trigger trademark lawyers at these big firms are (maybe? possibly?) realizing that shooting off a cease and desist letter at the first opportunity isn't the best decision.

Of course, if they had decided to use the logo of a clothing company like The North Face, perhaps the outcome would have been a bit different...

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: c and d grand prix, cease and desist, streisand effect, trademark
Companies: mschf, subway


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2022 @ 11:47am

    maybe if they'd put a word remotely resembling "monster" somewhere on the shirt. like on the inside, in small print.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    MathFox, 27 Jan 2022 @ 11:56am

    troll meets troll

    The lawyers must have recognized the mschf trolling for what is was...

    Troll meets troll and both walk on.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2022 @ 3:33pm

    you must be kiddin'! once an asshole, always an asshole!!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2022 @ 8:08pm

      Re:

      Of course. many lawyers are in it for the money, and its profitable to be an asshole. People hire them to be assholes for then because there's money in it and as long as the Almighty Dollar rules, people will be assholes. In this case, there was no big money in it, so the lawyers can afford to be nice and funny : ) wait until there is big money at stake and bet you'll see same people being assholes...

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), 27 Jan 2022 @ 7:13pm

    Did the woman who was running Wendy's Twiiter account get a new job at Subway? I know she had left Wendy's (IIRC) and this is the same sort of thinking & playful corporate wink she made the twitter account famous for.

    Subway is going to see a boost, MSCHF will remain a top the lets see who we can piss off this month hill, its brilliant and its win win.

    The best part is, I doubt they collaborated on this (maybe near the end). Subway saw an opening & jumped into the playful end. No whining they were left out, they dove right into the middle of the party with a cannonball no one saw coming.

    Everyone gets a lot of publicity & goodwill, and everyone walks away still 'friends' and some lawyers cry having not been unleashed.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    icon
    Farrell (profile), 27 Jan 2022 @ 11:51pm

    If anyone is doing anything against the law, the youths have to inform the competent authority to take further action. It will avoid causing losses to the nation https://www.epayitonline.one/

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    TonyLurker, 28 Jan 2022 @ 5:58am

    Blue Checks

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2022 @ 5:36pm

    Is this the same Subway who filed the frivolous SLAPP suit against the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and Trent University?

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.