Court Rejects PA DAs Attempt To Charge Teens For Sexting Themselves
from the common-sense-prevails dept
About a year ago a prosecutor in Pennsylvania wanted to bring child porn charges against some teenage girls who had taken some "nude and seminude" photos of themselves with cameraphones and sent them to others. The case was complicated in that after school officials turned over the evidence to the district attorney, the DA's office told the girls that they could avoid charges if they agreed to a special afterschool "education program." Some of the girls refused, and the prosecutor tried to charge them. This raised an outcry from many who felt it was ridiculous to charge kids with child pornography for taking photos of themselves. The judges in the case blocked the prosecutor from filing charges, but rather than take the hint, the prosecutor tried again with an appeal.It looks like that was a dead end too. The appeals court unanimously ruled against the DA and criticized them for their efforts to bring charges against these girls. This case won't necessarily directly apply to other similar cases -- as much of the reasoning had to do with the requirement to take this class and write an essay about why what they did was "wrong," which was judged to be compelled speech, violating the First Amendment. Furthermore, the fact that the lawsuit was seen as retaliating for not obeying the order to take the class was also problematic. So, it's likely we'll still see other cases involving "sexting," where teenagers are accused of creating child porn of themselves.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: pennsylvania, sexting
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The bigger irony is that the kids wouldn't be able to make decisions in their trials without the consent of a parent or guardian, would they?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I felt a bad matthew mcconaughey line was needed here.
Good times!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I wasn't aware he had any GOOD lines....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
AlrightAlrightAlright.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
CBMHB
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Under Section 230 the host site is not responsible for user created content.
Someone's going to make a fortune off of underagesexting.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
um...
You're pointing out that Verizon, ATT, etc. are not liable for the jihad against young people sending depictions of their own body to others.
Which should be, but apparently isn't, obvious. Your hypothetical service, on the other hand, would die a very, very quick death, which should be equally obvious.
I wonder if these teens asserted copyright over their images and called it branding, would these asshole DAs shut up and stop interfering with commerce?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Really, who is the pervert here?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
no
It's the only way to make sure other children stay safe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not crazy,
It is pretty clear from the context that "sexting themselves" refers to the act of sending nudie pictures which depict the sender to a second party.
It is possible to read the text in the way you do, but that way tends to obstruct conversation, or lead to becoming Scalia (except when he finds it inconvenient).
And, really, who would want to be a well paid, tenured absolute authority with a penchant for applying Catholic doctrine selectively in order to enforce retrograde notions of how people really live?
Oh, wait.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sexting themselves!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sexting themselves!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sexting themselves!!
There is arguably a privacy concern there -- about whether or not the school has the right to look through cellphones that they confiscate -- but this has nothing to do with any sort of electronic snooping or monitoring of calls and texts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sexting themselves
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sexting themselves
No, some of the girls, and ostensibly their parents, refuse to allow the GOVERNMENT to FORCE them to take the program, something I would do as a parent as well...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sexting themselves
1. does not have children
2. has children that are under the age of 15.
3. has one or more children aged 15 or older and you were COMPLETELY ignorant of the stuff your kid did/does.
being a parent of 2 teen aged boys im sure i am not the only one that can tell you that its not always a matter of not being a parent. and in this case it would appear that the only real parents involved are the ones saying they will not allow their kids to be forced into a "special class" to educate them.
i have excellent parents that were involved, cared about what i did and did a LOT of volunteer time for stuff that i was involved in for high school... and big surprise here... they had no idea of some of the stuff i was doing then.
and my kids try to do the same thing. them trying to get away with stuff and me setting limits and catching them is the natural evolution from childhood to adulthood where they are trying to expand their boundries as they grow up.
and you toss in the rampant idiocy that hormones creates in teenagers with easily accessible technology and im sorry, you are dumb to expect anything other than a situation like this.
personally, i take my kids cell right out of his hands right in front of him on a 1-2week basis and its always spur of the moment and i go through what he has on his phone. THATS how you do it right.
i applaud those parents who refused to let their kids take this class and to the others that let their kids go to this special class i say its time you stopped letting the government be the parent of your kids. you are the reason this country is slowly becoming a giant all around failure and your spawn will most likely make sure that job gets finished.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sexting themselves
Some of the parents preferred to actually parent their children themselves.
You're upset that they wanted to raise their own children, as opposed to letting the government do that for them?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
=======================
This really sounds like the screenplay for a bad porno flick.
Maybe the DA planned to take advantage of them...I mean he already knew that they're sluts...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]