Scammers Using Mock Copyright Lawsuit Threats To Get People To Download Malware
from the copying-the-best-in-the-business dept
With companies like Digiprotect, Davenport Lyons and ACS:Law busy sending out tens of thousands of so-called pre-settlement letters that threaten people (often on very little evidence, if any) of copyright infringement, but allow them to pay up to avoid a lawsuit, is it any surprise that out-and-out scammers are jumping into the game as well? Ben alerts us to a warning from US-CERT of a new email scam, which involves the scammers sending out legitimate looking emails pretending to be from a law firm, telling the recipients they're being sued for copyright infringement. The details are supposedly in a file at a URL provided in the email. When a visitor goes to that URL and downloads the file, they get malware instead. Yes, it appears that the malware scammers are now learning from the best in the business...![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ooh, scathing. Hits the nail on the head, too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I might go write that program cause it shouldn't be very hard now should it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This could turn even worse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You'd think...
No legitimate law firm is going to send out correspondence that both capitalizes and misspells "Pretrail Conference".
And this sentence sounds like it was written by a 5-year-old:
"The reason the lawsuit was filed was due to
a completely inadequate response from your company
for copyright infrigement that our client Touchstone
Advisories Inc is a victim of Copyright infrigement"
No punctuation, random words capitalized, and basically nonsensical. It's almost as if English isn't the author's native language...
Anyone who falls for this and thinks a real law firm put this out needs to have their head examined.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You'd think...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funny
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And what's the penalty again for a 'false claim of copyright infringement'?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How do you get malware from just downloading a file? Unless it's an EXE file and you're stupid enough to believe that a law firm would ask you to download and run a program. Of course, comsidering the complete cluelessness of today computer "users", it wouldn't surprise me if this is exactly what they're doing...
They don't even need to download or share copywrite material to / from your computer they just need to write some code so your ip address shows up on p2p or torrent software.
Why go to all that trouble, when you can just a screenshot and plain-text log file to show an IP address you want?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The screenshot or plain text file aren't infringing in themselves. That is the kind of "evidence" that is used in copyright infringement cases. You get accused of infringement, dragged into court and the anti-piracy groups show up with screenshots and log files as "proof" that your IP address was the one sharing the files.
I suppose in some cases, they get an order to copy your drive and look through it for evidence, but at the start of the case, all they have are (easily faked) screenshots and log files.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
EXE installed malware has always been low-class scriptkiddy material,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Read the article again, it specifically says that users get infected with malware when they download a file. If it was a drive-by installation, why make them download a file at all? That just looks more suspicious.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Too bad they didn't patent it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SCAM JOURNAL - ijcaonline.org
International Journal of Computer Applications
ijcaonline.org
The best place to publish nonsensical papers!!!
Papers published by IJCA have no recognition in most Universities!!
Blacklisted by several universities in Europe, US and Asia!!
International Journal of Computer Applications
ijcaonline.org
a SCAM JOURNAL!!! BEWARE!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good alerts...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lawsuit Scam
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]