Microsoft Sued Over Buy From FM Zune Feature, Despite It Functioning Differently Than The Patent
from the nice-work-if-you-can-get-it dept
Technically, we're told, patents only are supposed to apply to specific inventions, and not general ideas. It doesn't always work that way in practice, of course. AdamR points us to a lawsuit filed by some guy against Microsoft, claiming patent infringement in Zune's "Buy from FM" feature that lets you buy a song that you hear over FM radio. The guy is claiming willful infringement and demanding treble damages, because he apparently wrote Microsoft a letter back in 2006. Of course, there appears to be a pretty big problem with the claim, in that the patents in question (6,463,469 and 6,473,792) appear to describe a process of unlocking music already found on a local harddrive -- which is not how the Zune's feature works.![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
FM
I guess that the trouble with trebles...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: FM
Ronald J. Riley,
I am speaking only on my own behalf.
Affiliations:
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (810) 597-0194 / (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 8 pm EST.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: FM
Thanks for being one of the "drivel" you retard.
The only thing larger than your head is your obnoxious signature.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: FM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
oh comeone lets have fun
EVERYTHING
hey isn't it fun suing people and screaming and yelling and throwing large chairs
YOU TOO can learn how to partake in this wonderful new career.
SEND 9.99 to the following post office box and get your DRMED DVDR today.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: oh comeone lets have fun
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: oh comeone lets have fun
and hopefully we can take some of our bogus lawsuits all the way up to the supreme court in hopes to set a patent alleviation precedent for future generations to come as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: oh comeone lets have fun
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Patents do apply to specific inventions but what you see on the surface of a product is does not necessarily have much to do with what is happening internally. It is possible to have very different interfaces for an invention.
On top of this is the fact that Microsoft is repeatedly sued and repeatedly is losing suits. They have repeatedly been subjected to punitive damages for willfulness.
In other words the best explanation for Microsoft's legal problems is that they are a company whose business model is built on systematic infringement of other's inventions.
Ronald J. Riley,
I am speaking only on my own behalf.
Affiliations:
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (810) 597-0194 / (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 8 pm EST.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Ummm, no. The best explanation for Microsoft's legal problems is that they have alot of money and everyone wants some of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Microsoft Money
Ronald J. Riley,
I am speaking only on my own behalf.
Affiliations:
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (810) 597-0194 / (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 8 pm EST.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Microsoft Money
As to where they get their money and why they keep having their heads handed to them, that is obvious. In many cases, they get their money by using their market heft to push products which implement concepts patented by other inventors. They get their heads handed to them because they have obviously violated these patents. In many cases, they violate unapologetically.
The issue with this case, however, is that they are not violating the patents at all because the functionality of the Zune is not covered by the patents in question.
So, when you say "Microsoft always steals patents" and the reply is "Yes, they often do, but not this time", it is an invalid reply to state "Yes, but they steal patents!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So, to start with, he seems to have patented an idea. Can you show me the actual invention if you disagree?
Next, the way the Zune feature works looks significantly different.
Finally, this seems to be a hard sell on the obviousness test given there was prior art for identifying music being played. Do you disagree?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MShit's patent tactics
MShit Research Phd folks were there, as usual, a lot of them
They go to all technical conferences, read and openly discuss all technical papers, and develop those ideas into their products, knowing all the way that there is corresponding patent application waiting for PTO approval
But when asked about whether they read patent app at uspto.gov (which has a lot more details than conference paper) they suddenly become numb and deaf
AS one Mshit research PhD told me: "Our corporate legal counsel told us not to read any patents or patent applications so we do not read them"
You reap what you sow...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But I suppose that's normal for shills.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What is odd is RJR is content with submitting low/no-content posts that complain about "drivel". Isn't that what a no-content post with an obnoxious signature is? If you absolutely have to use a signature, try this: Count the words in your post and count the words in your signature. If the length of the signature is longer than the content of your post, your post is more noise than signal.
On the actual topic, I don't see how this could go through. Yes MS infringes on patents, but in this case, it looks like the functionality described by the patents and the functionality of the Zune are different. I'm no fan of Microsoft, but I prefer to dislike them for things they have actually done wrong.
Doesn't it make more sense to assess things on a case-by-case basis than to unilaterally hate MS even in cases when they're not at fault?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How about telling us who you are and what your affiliations are? Then your comments might have some credibility.
Ronald J. Riley,
I am speaking only on my own behalf.
Affiliations:
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (810) 597-0194 / (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 8 pm EST.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
He's probly one of Mikey's reincarnations on this site
Mikey has many clones here
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What about Apple?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cautious
That is the way it works. No one can sue a party for infringement unless based on analysis of the claims and the purported infringing use leads counsel to conclude the purported infringer is indeed infringing. Otherwise, you set yourself up for counter suit and possible sanctions. As you might imagine, plaintiffs are very cautious before filing suit. Sounds like you don't understand the claims at issue or the purported infringing activities of the defendant.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: cautious
[ link to this | view in chronology ]