Views On The Digital Economy Bill Shifting Rapidly
from the getting-dizzy dept
Well, this is a bit of a surprise. The Liberal Democrats in the UK, who had previously pushed to add some troubling language to the Digital Economy Bill, are now not only skeptical of the bill, but fighting the plan to rush it through the House of Commons. As you may recall, the plan was to zip this through the Commons via a wash up procedure, which doesn't allow for debate. The goal was to get it done before the election is held. However, the LibDems apparently have heard (loudly) from their constituents:On Tuesday afternoon, the party's chief whip Paul Burstow tweeted that he had told the government the Liberal Democrats will not support the bill as it is drafted because there is "not enough time for MPs to examine it in detail".That said, it seems like there's a lot of rapidly changing views on the Digital Economy Bill. With more and more opposition growing, the government amended one of the more controversial clauses, so that it's greatly watered down. The clause that previously could have shut down legitimate sites based on some infringing use now requires courts to take into account those legitimate users. It also makes it so ISPs won't have to pay court costs, meaning they're less likely to shut something down just to avoid court.
Meanwhile, reader Phatnobody notes that according to some copyright holders, the Digital Economy Bill doesn't go far enough.
Given all of these shifting and changing views (and shifting and changing provisions in the bill), it seems like it would be a really dangerous move to simply rush the bill through with no debate. These are major issues that impact a very large percentage of the population. Not allowing for an open debate on the issue seems very, very questionable.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: digital economy bill, united kingdom
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
New clause isn't an improvement
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Then again, you have no interest in justice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
THEM STEALERS ARE DESTROYING OUR OBSOLETE INDUSTRY!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think what they are saying is
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I wonder ...
One can only hope ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They asked for donations amounting up to £10,000 and have gotten over £20,000. Methinks the word will get out one way or another.
https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/page/contribute/DigitalEconomyBillAd
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/2010/03/30/digital-economy-bill-what-did-your-mp-say/#comment-4 2466986
Should make an interesting read.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
thank Iommi for that!
apologıes for the funny letters, ı am usıng a turkısh keyboard ;D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Votes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Votes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]