DailyDirt: Let's Play Global Thermonuclear War
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
Artificial intelligence projects are getting better and better at playing games against humans. Pretty soon, we'll just let computers play games for us -- because they'll be better at them. Here are just a few more interesting links on AI research playing with games.- Space Station Invaders is a video game created by a computer program named Angelina -- a piece of software meant to help human game designers. Angelina's creator says, "In theory there is nothing to stop an artist sitting down with Angelina, creating a game every 12 hours and feeding that into the Apple App Store." [url]
- A machine-learning system from MIT has "understood" the meanings of some words only by playing Civilization and having access to the player's manual for the game. This algorithm plays better if it has read the manual -- just like human players? [url]
- Dr. Fill is a crossword-player program that performed better than a lot of humans at the American Crossword Puzzle Tournament in Brooklyn. It finished 141st out of 600 (if it had been ranked officially with human players), and after losing, it said bluntly, "I'll be back." [url]
- To discover more interesting tech-related content, check out what's currently floating around the StumbleUpon universe. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ai, artificial intelligence, civilization, crossword, game algorithms, games
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
ok... so really really hard crossword puzzles are on the way..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A strainge game.
How about a nice game of chess?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: ok... so really really hard crossword puzzles are on the way..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What, please, precisely distinguishes a computer program's "saying" something "bluntly" as opposed to just saying it without any aspect of bluntness? In other words, that which cannot even "say"--by word or deed-- may not be "blunt" since being blunt, too, implies intent.
At this rate, when computers "tell us" that they are "smarter" than we (humans) are, apparently "we'll" believe "them".
I ask: are "we" capable of asking (and recognizing): "How STUPID is that?!"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
to "say" something implies "intent." But a computer program cannot--by definition--have any intent. So it makes nonsense of the verb "to say" to say, assert, contend, that a computer program could say "I'll be back."--even more absurd and hilarious is the assertion that the program "said" this "bluntly".
What, please, precisely distinguishes a computer program's "saying" something "bluntly" as opposed to just saying it without any aspect of bluntness? In other words, that which cannot even "say"--by word or deed-- may not be "blunt" since being blunt, too, implies intent.
At this rate, when computers "tell us" that they are "smarter" than we (humans) are, apparently "we'll" believe "them".
I ask: are "we" capable of asking (and recognizing): "How STUPID is that?!"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
war
[ link to this | view in thread ]