Apple Needs To Offer More, Less Porn, Depending Who You Ask
from the wiggles-and-jiggles dept
Apple's recent scuff up in the media over banning a Putlitzer prize-winning cartoonist from the application store only served to once again highlight Apple's inconsistent and seemingly arbitrary application store approval process. It also directed people's attention to the fact that Mark Fiore certainly wasn't the first person to have an application banned for strange things like "ridiculing public figures," which violates Apple's iPhone Developer Program License Agreement. In fact, there have been 16 applications banned for this most grievous of offenses, and as is usually the case with Apple, the company spent most of their time ignoring questions about why content continues to be inconsistently blocked.
This latest scuff up about Apple gate-keeping also gave some people a platform to once again complain that Apple shouldn't be blocking access to pornography. While Apple's PR department can't apparently answer a straight question about their app approval process, Steve Jobs did personally take time to respond to one user's e-mailed porn concerns by telling him to go buy an Android phone:
"Fiore's app will be in the store shortly. That was a mistake. However, we do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone. Folks who want porn can buy and (sic) Android phone."
Not that Google and the porn industry didn't appreciate the shout out, but porn isn't really as big of an issue as Apple's inconsistent approval process (which Jobs once again really doesn't explain). Apple already makes a very nice porn application called Safari for those interested. While Apple does ban porn, they've perhaps more annoyingly banned applications for being porn that weren't (like a swimsuit sales application). Meanwhile, even though Jobs says he has a "moral responsibility" to keep porn off the iPhone, the Parents Television Council this week proclaimed he's not doing a good enough job. The group personally, painstakingly cataloged everything they felt was filthy in the app store:
"Typical content has included items with names like "Shawna Lee Private Dance," which shows a porn starlet with her hand down the front of her bikini bottom fondling herself; "Love Positions Free," with a drawing titled "doggystyle," showing a couple having sex; "1001 Boobs Lite;" and "Tasty Pasties 18+ Amateurs" (at one point, the 11th most popular "app" out of thousands on iTunes). All of these applications are free -- and available to children."Of course if the Parents Television Council's findings show anything (aside from the fact the Council spent a lot of time looking at half-naked women) it highlights -- once again -- that nobody understands how Apple determines worthy content. Amusingly, the Council didn't bother to complain about the Android Marketplace, where users can freely get porn of all kinds -- not just the odd smattering of soft-core apps that passed Apple's incoherent muster. Not that trying to censor porn apps really matters, given the existence of something some people call "a browser," which provides people of all ages access to a universe of content of all kinds. Apparently, nobody can win in this strange equation, be it porn fans, porn opponents, developers, or Shawna Lee.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
mo pron
[ link to this | view in thread ]
HAHA ascii censorship LOL
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Also, won't someone please think of the children! Oh the children! They're being ruined by kind-of porn on their supposed iphones! What kid who isn't old enough to see some tits has an iphone anyways?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2010/04/iphones_gay_cruising_app_leads.php
[ link to this | view in thread ]
who cares about porn, what about google talk?
there's also the playboy app, which is all the predominantly white hetero-normative porn you will ever need with the added bonus of being from a big corporation from california.
speaking of apps from big california corps, when does the google talk app come out for the ipod touch?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Apple is a bunch of Appholes!
http://ccinsider.comedycentral.com/2010/04/29/jon-stewart-on-the-applegizmodo-debacle/? xrs=rss_comedycentralinsider
Jon Stewart takes Apple/SJ to task over the Gizmodo Phone issue.
Freedom
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Enablers
That is, available to children whose parents bought them an iphone with a voice and data plan, or at least an expensive iPod Touch, and supplied them with an app store password.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Enablers
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Well of course not. Google didn't make the stupid claim that you can't get porn from their app store.
As Steve was stupid enough to say that the iPhone is the non porn, THINK OF THE CHILDREN phone of choice, it needs to be checked out to make sure that the children are 100% safe from T&A.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: PTC points to the good stuff
The removed apps seem to fall closer to the swimsuit calendar category than anything else, at least judging from the screenshots via Google.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: HAHA ascii censorship LOL
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Apple is a bunch of Appholes!
For those outside of the United States.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hypocrites
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
They don't allow apps and then only let them in after they receive complaints. It's part of the Official App Store Business Plan:
1. Develop App
2. Get App Rejected
3. Get Media Outrage Over Rejection
4. Get In App Store
5. ???
6. Profits
The questionable apps in there were probably approved that day they had that temp in who hadn't completed his Apple Brainwash Training Program yet. He ended up using common sense instead of following Rule Number One of the App Store Approval Guidelines Document: "1. Reject App for Questionable Material".
[ link to this | view in thread ]