Google Releases Stats On Country Info & Takedown Requests; Leaves Us Wanting More

from the transparency-is-good dept

Tue, Apr 20th 2010 6:00pm — Mike Masnick

Google's getting some attention for its decision to launch a tool highlighting the information requests made by various governments to Google, either to gather information or to take down certain content. According to Google, this is a part of its efforts to try to keep the internet more open, as seen by its decision to leave China and its pushing back on Australia's attempts at censorship. Of course, many will claim that this is just self-serving on Google's part, since it's better off with a more open internet -- but that doesn't mean the initiative is a bad idea.

Still, it's not clear really how much there is to learn from this tool. Basically, we see that Brazil requests a lot of information and takedowns -- and the US requests an awful lot of info. And... well.. then we're left wondering. The tool does breakdown the nature of the removal requests, but not in very much detail. And it doesn't do that for the data requests. So, really, all this tool does is leave us wondering what exactly is being requested and/or taken down. Perhaps that's the point of the tool: to get people to ask more questions, but it seems like Google could have done a bit more to highlight that kind of information as well.

Separately, in its op-ed about the new program, Google also suggests that the best tool for encouraging a decrease in repressive governments is through better free trade agreements. If only that were the case. Real free trade agreements can increase openness tremendously, but lately the sorts of "free trade agreements" we've seen have been things like ACTA -- which is not at all about openness, and very much about using the same repressive tools used by China to try to block forms of communication.

It's good that Google is encouraging some discussion on this topic, and perhaps this is the point of the limited tool, but looking through it seems to simply open up a lot more questions than it answers.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: data, governments, information requests, maps
Companies: google

18 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 20 Apr 2010 @ 7:35pm

two posts in the same day? the masnick makes a shocking return to techdirt. too bad your are buying into google trying to stack the deck for political advancement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- BearGriz72 (profile), 20 Apr 2010 @ 8:16pm
  
  Re:
  Alert: Tinfoil Hats Required...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chargone (profile), 20 Apr 2010 @ 9:16pm
  
  Re:
  because having someone who's interest conincide with one's own 'stacking the deck' is oh so much worse than the usual run of political shenanigans.
  
  ...
  
  yeah, that was sarcasm.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 20 Apr 2010 @ 10:16pm
  
  Re:
  TAM, are you off your meds again?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2010 @ 6:16am
    
    Re: Re:
    "Hi Mike"
    
    Ha! Beat you to it! Now go back to bed troll.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The Groove Tiger (profile), 21 Apr 2010 @ 1:47am
  
  Re:
  again, the tam shows his true colors by promoting the raporism of underage unicorns.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
not the AC, 20 Apr 2010 @ 8:10pm

Same silly V from the AC ?
Of course, what else did anyone expect.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 18 Jul 2010 @ 1:26pm
  
  Re: hi
  Hello dear
  how are you doing, My name is miss Jennifer khalifa i saw your profile here on this site (podnapisi.net) then i decided to contact you after going through it Am seeking for friendship with you in a long term relationship am a single girl never married before i like sports, dancing and going to the beach etc,
  i believe you will like to share future dream together with me If you accept me after going through my profile send me a mail to my Email box
  (jennifer20000khl@yahoo.com) i believe we can move from here
  distance not be a barrier but lets connect cos love is
  a bridge that brings far distance to be close
  am waiting for your mail
  Quick reply
  
  yours
  Jennifer ( jennifer20000khl@yahoo.com )
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
R, 20 Apr 2010 @ 10:55pm

Free Trade Agreement
The reason has such poor copyright law is because of the US Free Trade Agreement - I'm not holding my breath
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Richard (profile), 20 Apr 2010 @ 11:40pm

Maybe Google are afraid of being accused of generating your favourite "Streisand effect" by pointing out what content is being taken down and by who.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Marcus Carab (profile), 21 Apr 2010 @ 4:20pm

If I recall correctly, the tool also doesn't count the number of things requested, only the number of requests - and that one request could be for a single takedown or piece of information, or for a hundred of them. If that's true then these statistics would be massively skewed by simple bureaucratic nuances: an office in one government might have a system where they send a bunch of separate requests while the same office in another government bundles them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 26 Apr 2010 @ 12:39am

It's good that Google is encouraging some discussion on this topic, and perhaps this is the point of the limited tool, but looking through it seems to simply open up a lot more questions than it answers.

Much like your typical LOST episode.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
girl games, 4 May 2010 @ 1:34am

new google tool
well, it is better than nothing, we will always want more tools with more abilities, but that what Google decided to provide in that version.
Maybe in the next version they will provide more.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ben 10 games, 6 May 2010 @ 11:53am

google tool
Not bad but it could be better i am sure in the next version they will provide more then that
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Coach Hire, 24 Jul 2010 @ 11:58pm

Its correct
Even while they are newcomers to Washington, they have apparently learned the lessons of the K Street Project -- the Republican effort to force businesses to hire only Republican lobbyists and to make donations to GOP candidates and committees, and to fill the major lobbying firms with Republican staffers from Capitol Hill.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
dora games, 30 Nov 2010 @ 6:06pm

answer
The point of the tool is to get people to ask more questions, but it seems like Google could have done a bit more to highlight that kind of information and gave more answers .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ms Pacman, 19 Jun 2011 @ 3:49am

No sense
I don't see any sense in this tool?!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zubair Khan, 3 Mar 2015 @ 12:09am

Great Tool
It is great tool Google always care their user. And always gives the some thing different and interesting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]