After Legal Drum-Beating, Author Admits He Trashed Competitors In Amazon Reviews

from the when-you're-in-a-hole... dept

There's been an almighty kerfuffle in British historian circles the last couple of weeks, after some people noticed a couple of reviewers on Amazon were talking up one historian's work while trashing books written by others in the same field. The author in question was named Orlando Figes, a professor at London's Birkbeck College. One of the pseudonyms used on Amazon was "orlando-birkbeck", so it wasn't too difficult to assume who was posting the reviews. Word started getting around and was picked up by some newspapers, leading Figes' lawyer to deny his involvement and demand corrections be run, suggesting Figes could be entitled to damages. Then, the lawyer issued a statement blaming Figes' wife (herself a lawyer) for the reviews. Not surprisingly, Figes has now admitted he wrote the reviews, and he's very sorry. This isn't the first time authors have been caught giving themselves good reviews, and generally, most attempts to do this sort of thing end badly. You'd expect by now that most reasonably intelligent people would understand that, and figure out that the potential downside of getting caught far outweighs any positive benefit the fake reviews could deliver. Then again, you'd also expect that most reasonably intelligent people wouldn't fall for 419 scams, either.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: reviews, trashing
Companies: amazon


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    kosmonautbruce (profile), 23 Apr 2010 @ 3:25pm

    Disappointing

    While this sort of thing does happen a lot, as someone who was a history grad student in a former life, I do find this case surprising. Figes is a *big* name in his field (Russian history), and certainly should be well above this sort of behavior. I don't know anything about him personally, but this comes off as incredibly petty and lame (and far more damaging to his reputation than any lame Amazon review could do).

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Apr 2010 @ 4:11pm

    film at 11. shocking news. you heard the sun sets each day too, right?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      question, 23 Apr 2010 @ 4:24pm

      Re: GlassHalfFull

      Why do you even bother

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Cohen (profile), 23 Apr 2010 @ 5:21pm

        The Coward is right

        While I don't usually agree with the Coward, I do for this.

        The concept that people are rigging the reviews on Amazon is hardly news. And getting exposed isn't either.

        I have a friend whose job it is to go through websites and post "reviews" of competitors products that would cast doubt on the safety and efficacy of those products.

        She then ever-so-gently suggests that a certain other product would be much better and/or safer.

        She actually had to take a writing test so they could tell if she writes well. And the company gives her the correct talking points that she should use to trash others.

        So why not the same thing with a lowly author?

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          abc gum, 23 Apr 2010 @ 7:01pm

          Re: The Coward is right

          There are many things which recur on a regular basis, this by itself is not a good reason for flippant dismissal.

          Had this type of story been published on this blog several times in the past week then there would be grounds for such disdain. However, that is not the case.

          It is apparent to me that the AC post is all too predictable and common place.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 25 Apr 2010 @ 10:47am

            Re: Re: The Coward is right

            slack posts by a third stringer masnick backup are reason for flippant dismissal. just because the idea is new to carlo doesnt mean the rest of the world didnt already know about it for the last, oh, 10 years or so.

            link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 23 Apr 2010 @ 4:37pm

      Re:

      Really?

      I must be living in a rather strange part of the world then, because I only see one sunset a year.

      Thanks for the update, I'll be sure to keep watch today.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Apr 2010 @ 8:17pm

    D'oh!

    Those who remember history are doomed to repeat it.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.