Can We Please Put The 'Amateur Brain Surgeon' Strawman To Rest?
from the please,-make-it-go-away dept
For years, the common criticism of Wikipedia was the "brain surgery" myth, which usually was something along the lines of saying, "you wouldn't let an amateur or 'the crowd' perform brain surgery, so why would you let them create a reference book?" Of course, that makes a bunch of bogus assumptions. First, it assumes that there's some sort of equivalence between creating an encyclopedia and doing brain surgery. But that's silly. Second, it assumes that no one involved in Wikipedia is an expert, which is not true. In fact, there are some brain surgeons who patrol Wikipedia as well. Finally, it assumes that these kinds of services are based on everyone being on equal footing, rather than recognizing that well-supported content is what gets through.Along those lines, we've now got people using the same bogus "brain surgery" myth to attack the concept of "citizen journalism":
First, would you trust a citizen neurosurgeon to remove your kid's neuroblastoma? No, you wouldn't. You would not trust a citizen dentist either for your cavities. Or even a people's car repairman.Of course not. But most people seem to recognize the basic difference between reporting on something and cutting into someone's brain. And, many people also recognize that most reporters themselves are often not experts in the field they're reporting on -- and what participatory journalism and the internet enable is the ability for actual experts on the topic to take part in the discussion and reporting as well.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Citizen Journalism
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_surgery
Less then a page, hardly impressive.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
As a layman this is perfectly adequate, if I wish to know more I will research further; perhaps starting at the bottom of the wiki page that give references.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Together with the top page, this forms a tiny bit of the information you can access on Wikipedia related to brain surgery. This second page leads to hundreds of other pages on Wikipedia.
*****
Let me ask Dan something that apparently I have forgotten from my 5th grade human body study's class.
We know that patients who had blood removed surgically after undergoing a CT scan showing the presence of hematoma have a significant risk of experiencing rebleeding at the site.
This was basically common knowledge back in school..
30 days hath September,
April, June, and November,
These plus one's still fewer
Than the portion who rebleed
Post fixing the Hematoma need.
So since it's so important to pick the right surgical procedure, [and here is my question, Dan:] which, clipping or coiling, is generally used to fix aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery?
I couldn't remember the answer, and Wikipedia, likely written by third and fourth graders, probably doesn't cover it.
Help?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerebral_aneurysm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Disappointed that Wikipedia isn't going to get you off the hook for that neurosurgery exam you have on Monday?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
comparison
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: comparison
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In my experience
This also applies to electricians who can burn your house down, firemen who can fail to prevent it burning down, and Christmas tree sellers who think they know how to rope the tree to your roof, whilst blowing the fuse on your seat belt motors. His 40 years experience didn't teach him anything except to overrate his skills.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'm sorry, what side of this issue are you trying to support here?
I really can't tell :-S
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I'm sorry, what side of this issue are you trying to support here?
I really can't tell :-S"
If it helps: 1000 * 0 = 0 but 1 * >0 = >0
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
It's a reference to statistics.
1000 samples from a crappy sensor averaged together will likely get you better accuracy than just 1 sample from a good sensor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
(points for whomever gets the ref.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Just watched that episode yesterday.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
One of the worst episodes ever, but kudos for working in the reference!
HM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So neurosurgeons and dentists aren't citizens?
Oh, and car repairs....that's hardly rocket science...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Balance?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Balance?
HM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
re
One fallacy you may not have picked out here is the appeal to authority. I've known experts who were jokes, and average joes who knew more than the experts.
Whether or not I believe what someone says or writes has to do with their facts and argumentation. They needn't bother sending me their resume.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Frankly...
If we were to equate the skills and practices of a professional brain surgeon to those of a modern professional journalist, I'd give serious thought to just taking my chances on that tumor...
HM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
HM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But
But we trust the unqualified to run major corporations and even to run the national banking system.
Consider the following (reposted from the ZOPA jokes thread)
WHO IS THE ODD MAN OUT - and more importantly - WHY??
Lord Stevenson: former chairman, HBOS (Halifax Bank of Scotland (a major UK BANK))
Sir Fred Goodwin: former chief executive, RBS (Royal Bank of Scotland - one of the largest banks in the world)
Andy Hornby: former chief executive, HBOS
Sir Tom McKillop: former chairman, RBS
John McFall MP: Former chairman of Treasury Select Committee
Alastair Darling: Former Chancellor of the Exchequer
Gordon Brown: Former Prime Minister and former Chancellor
Sir Terry Wogan: presenter of Radio 2's Breakfast Show
You're probably thinking
Terry Wogan.
You're right.
However, the reason may surprise you...........
Terry Wogan is the only one out of this motley crew who
actually holds any formal banking qualification.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Legacy Journalists are scum
they are actively misleading people. So they would be best compared to criminals rather than brain surgeons
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The same cannot be said of brain surgery. If you screw up, you can't just roll it back or fix the mistake. So of course I wouldn't want a crowd of people (some not experts) working on my brain. The experts wouldn't be able to fix the non-experts' mistakes.
The whole point of Wikipedia is that it progressively improves, not that it's correct the first time every time.
The comparison is just utterly bogus on so many levels.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The real reason
Further more if its the profession that makes people good at their job and only people who are good at their job can do the job at all, isnt that a bit of a chicken and egg problem? no one is born into a profession. Surely everyone can see that! I think its really all fear of the free
[ link to this | view in chronology ]