New Webinar: What IT People Need To Know About The Law
from the putting-on-that-legal-hat dept
A few weeks ago, we had a post about why IT people need to be knowledgeable about the law, rather than just about technology. It was based on an excellent article by Dave Navetta on The Legal Defensibility Era (pdf). For years, IT folks have recognized that they often wear two hats, switching between a technology one and a business one, as they often have to explain or justify the business tradeoffs of the IT decisions they make. But these days, they also really need to add a legal hat.Given the immense interest we received in this particular topic, we've decided that it will be the topic of our next webinar in our IT Innovation series: What IT needs to know about the law to be held next Wednesday, May 26th at 9am PT/noon ET. We're thrilled that Dave Navetta, who wrote the article that sparked the original discussion, will be participating and discussing this "era of legal defensibility" that IT people need to understand. Dave has built a career around bridging that gap between IT folks and legal folks, and is obviously perfect to be part of this discussion. With him will be Larry Downes, most recently the author of The Laws of Disruption, which is all about how the legal realm is hugely important to understanding business and technology in the world today, and how anyone looking to succeed in the internet age needs to understand some of these key legal principles. Larry's a well-known writer, speaker, pundit and consultant on this important intersection of the law and the technology world, and between David and Larry, the discussion should be quite a lot of fun. Once again, I'll be moderating.
I'm really excited about this particular topic and the two speakers. We've been preparing for the webinar over the past few days, and there are a ton of interesting topics to discuss, concerning how the law is impacting security, privacy and the wider IT world. Depending on timing, we may dip into some other areas, including intellectual property law, Section 230 and the like. Given the discussions we regularly have on this site, and how important legal issues have become in the IT world over the past few years, this is going to be a can't miss discussion, so sign up now. As with previous webinars, the discussion is designed to be interactive, and we can take questions from the audience via the web interface during the event, so please come ready with questions.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: it, legal defensibility, privacy, security
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Interesting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mikey is just a corporate shill
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
**I trolled with angry dude**
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
That's why he's so angry. His patent was for "A system for monetizing the ever growing and never falling housing market".
Oops!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I'd take first flight to Rio and fax my resignation letter from there...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
But perhaps there's a better way than a patent to monetize whatever it is you created. Is there any info on this creation you'd feel safe providing?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Trade secrets, my dear.. under the present anti-patent and anti-inventor regime
But trade secrets are well... secrets as opposed to open patent disclosures
You (anti-patent folks including the Supremes) asked for it - you got it
No more patent apps from my angriness
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Yes, we will post the webinars to listen to after they're done. We should have an announcement about the last one shortly...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
If you want to participate by listening live and asking questions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Legalities won't help if the boss is a crook
How does this relate to topics to be discussed at this forum?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Legalities won't help if the boss is a crook
If you're working for a company where your boss, boss's boss and CEO are all telling you to do something illegal... perhaps it's time to find a better place to work?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Legalities won't help if the boss is a crook
Great advice to IT folks from Mikey
Do you have any idea how difficult it is to find comparable position in IT industry nowadays ?
Apparently not
Read some insane job descriptions listing 50 different technologies and multiple job roles paying what used to be a starting IT salary back in late 90s
IT is dead as a profession in US
Amen
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Legalities won't help if the boss is a crook
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
thanks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WebinarListings
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: UltimateGuitar.com - Online Guitar tab & chord resource.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dora Games
[ link to this | view in chronology ]