Reminder: Take Our Survey On What Forces Will Impact The Future Of Work
from the don't-miss-out dept
Earlier this week, we announced our latest project from our think tank wing, the Copia Institute, called Working Futures. This is a project to really take an deep look at what the future of work might really look like in the next ten to fifteen years. As the first part of this project, we're asking people to take a quick survey, to help figure out which driving forces are going to play the most important role in what work looks like going forward. So far, the feedback and insights we've received have been fantastic, provocative and quite thoughtful. However, the more insight we get, the better the overall project will turn out, so if you haven't yet had a chance to do so, please head on over and take the survey. The future of work depends on you...
Filed Under: future of work, working futures
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Broken
And it's really annoying to have 2 vertical scrollbars on a page.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Broken
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Broken
Disabled, not blocked.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Broken
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Broken
Thanks for the warning that if I go there, Google will spy on me forever.
Have you learned nothing from the Facebook flap? People do NOT want to be tricked and tracked.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Broken
Thanks for the warning that if I go there, Google will spy on me forever.
That's not what javascript does.
Have you learned nothing from the Facebook flap? People do NOT want to be tricked and tracked.
There is no tricking or tracking. Just using javascript to make the survey work better.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Broken
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Broken
You will perhaps be more pleased to know that the main Working Futures site, which was indeed hand-coded from scratch, involves no JavaScript whatsoever, and I agree it is silly when simple non-interactive one-pager websites are built using robust and elaborate script frameworks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Broken
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
A few topics I haven't thought about lately. Nice off the cuff layout. No issues from my version of mac os + Chrome.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Maybe it's on purpose?
Maybe. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
What are readers to take from this but that going to the whatever site and taking the "poll", they may end up frustrated?
Web-site design fail AND even more off-putting "response".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
As the original person placing the question I consider it answered wonderfully btw. Maybe it's just me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'd like to at least read it even if I lack the requirements (js-1.8.5 etc) to take the survey.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Do y'all actually think this will produce anything substantive?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Do y'all actually think this will produce anything substantive?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"They trust me. Dumb fucks"
Rowhammer
Spectre
Meltdown
AnC/ASLR
Considering the very real dangers of running javascript, why do so many sites require javascript for things that don't need javascript?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Strategies for workers displaced by tech
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great Post
Take customer satisfaction surveys at https://www.surveylookup.com and won ultimate prizes, gift cards, coupons, sandwich, burger, pizza, and other food items for free of cost.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]