Why Should Customs Officers Be Determining What Counts As A Copyright Circumvention Device?
from the border-patrol dept
Some of the earliest fears around ACTA concerned some of the earliest draft suggestions, that would increase the power of border patrol/customs officials to look for infringement at the border, including the possibility of searching your laptop or iPod for infringing content. While those provisions mostly seemed to drop out in the negotiations, it doesn't mean that there aren't still efforts to get closer to that sort of system. Mart Kuhn, at Public Knowledge, has an interesting post, looking at a bill in the Senate that would give customs the authority to determine if things crossing the border were "circumvention devices" as prohibited by the DMCA. Of course, as the article notes, determining what is and what is not a circumvention device is not particularly easy -- as various lawsuits have demonstrated. So it's quite questionable as to why anyone thinks border patrol agents should be involved in that process at all.But a bigger issue is the same one at the heart of the debate over whether or not customs officials should have the right to search your laptop at the border. If the point of border patrol/customs is to prevent bad things from getting into the country, it's pretty ridiculous to try to prevent software at the border, because that software has already totally crossed over the border via the still mostly borderless internet. So this whole thing seems like a charade to look for more ways to take away basic privacy rights in favor of an entertainment industry that is so afraid someone might infringe that it doesn't realize trying to stop circumvention at the border won't do anything other than cause serious hassles for legitimate travelers.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: border patrol, circumvention, copyright, customs
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Hmm, I'm coming to the US in July, maybe I should scrub my Linux notebook before taking it across the border. Fresh install.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
www.videolan.org
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's the problem?
/sarcasm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What's the problem?
Sorry lady you can have your hair dryer back now, and sir I am keeping this spoon ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Because
OR maybe its a plot by the bankers to gt even with the economy and totally wrap it into a big turd flush?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OH Almost forgot
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
answer to #5
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Crossing over
what your government is actually doing is worse than you
can imagine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
so I think I've figured it out
it would be nice if they smartened up, with the justice dept in their pocket I don't see them dying ANYTIME EVER
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
aye, so easy even an angry tam could do it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The variations of such circumvention software could approach infinity. Listing an infinite number of discreet items is not "simple".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_obfuscation
you can pack the same binary multiple ways so you get progames that are functionally identical, but have vastly different bits.
packing is how a lot of malware slips past AV scanners and Intrustion Detection Systems:
http://www.finjan.com/MCRCblog.aspx?EntryId=1695
this is different than just keeping stuff in an encrypted volume. for one, it's easier since the binaries just work with no work on the users' part. pretty much all commercial software is obfuscated in order to impair reverse engineering, so chances are you are running packed binaries on your computer right now. also, a big encrypted block on a drive might keep your data safe, but it would give border types a reason to detain your or otherwise harass you into decrypting your data for inspection.
of course there is always deniable crypto:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deniable_encryption
it's a volume that decrypts one of two ways depending on the key entered, so you have a "safe" version and an "unsafe" version, depending on your audience.
there is a deniable crypto option built into truecrypt called hidden volumes:
http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/?s=hidden-volume
that said, it would be better all around to just keep your stuff somewhere online and not on disk so you can pull it down once you are over the border.
it's also probably a good idea to travel with an older laptop/cheap netbook so it's not a financial hardship if it gets confiscated/destroyed at the border.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
however, i would say that the border guards might think you are trying to transport kiddy porn or al-qaida secrets, so you might want to have a seat over there, as you are going to be in customs for a while.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
way to only read half the post, no wonder you AC's are so uninformed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
and you still miss mine. i said this:
this is different than just keeping stuff in an encrypted volume... a big encrypted block on a drive might keep your data safe, but it would give border types a reason to detain your or otherwise harass you into decrypting your data for inspection.
then i said this:
that said, it would be better all around to just keep your stuff somewhere online and not on disk so you can pull it down once you are over the border.
as in, you could encrypt stuff, but packing binaries so your circumvention tools evade detection in the open, or just leaving your stuff online and pulling it down after you cross the border would be better.
you also miss the larger point: it's so easy for serious circumvent-ers to evade searches at the border, so why are border patrols bothering with them at all? all these searches will do is harass innocent people. copyright circumvention will continue unimpeded and the only people who suffer will be the ones who get hassled at airports.
this is the same argument against DRM: DRM doesn't keep media products off of file sharing sites so why bother with it? all it does is inconvenience your paying customers and if you screw it up badly enough, it will actually drive them to piracy.
it's one thing for media companies to waste their money on something as futile as trying to stop file sharing. it's their money, they can throw it away if they want to. it's another for governments to waste tax payer dollars harassing people at the border. it's not their money, it's yours.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'll be damned if any border agent is going to run their software on my hardware.
I'd rather wipe the drive and restore from backup when I got to where I was going.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Encryption
PS: CCD = your laptop
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Encryption
You might change your mind sitting in that holding cell while waiting for them to do it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Crikey,
He could program anything with it, including copyright-circumventing software, viruses, you name it.
Let's lock him up and throw away the key.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah that 'll work
"Scene from an Airport
I've gotten to the front of the security line and handed the TSA officer my ID and ticket.
TSA Officer: (Looks at my ticket. Looks at my ID. Looks at me. Smiles.)
Me: (Smiles back.)
TSA Officer: (Looks at my ID. Looks at me. Smiles.)
Me: (Tips hat. Smiles back.)
TSA Officer: A beloved name from the blogosphere.
Me: And I always thought that I slipped through these lines anonymously.
TSA Officer: Don't worry. No one will notice. This isn't the sort of job that rewards competence, you know.
Me: Have a good day."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"cause serious hassles for legitimate travelers"
The sole way to end this erosion of your natural rights in favor of corporate profit-making granted rights is to recall that The Rich used to be rightly perceived as the enemy of civil society, and to limit the power of these "economic royalists". (Until the tendencies and excesses of The Rich became too evident to ignore, I never had any use for FDR...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
fingers are used in circumvention ( untying a knot )
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: fingers are used in circumvention ( untying a knot )
That depends. Have you been posting comments critical of copyright on Techdirt?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A souvinir to take home?
A digital lock breaches that agreement and forfeits the copyright. So do many license agreements, e.g., that limit reverse engineering.
A digital lock prevents both legal and illegal copying. A device for circumventing it is not therefore a copyright circumvention device. It is the lock which is the copyright circumvention device.
Any digital computer can have a program to pick a digital lock.
Who else gets the customs service to police their private property rights. How do taxpayers hold still for that?
When homeland security loads software onto your computer/device to look for lock picking software, what else does it look for? What software do they leave on the device?
Remember, the present US law is the customs can seize any digital device coming into the US for investigation without probable cause.
Good luck.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A souvinir to take home?
it doesn't matter. the DMCA makes all circumvention illegal. how do you win a game that cannot be won? by changing the rules.
When homeland security loads software onto your computer/device to look for lock picking software, what else does it look for? What software do they leave on the device?
Remember, the present US law is the customs can seize any digital device coming into the US for investigation without probable cause.
as always, the relentless march of technological progress is the solution.
falling prices on mobile phones have made them disposable. in time the same will be true of media players and laptops, indeed, for a no-frills music player it is already true. when laptops or netbooks reach a similar price point, the people who are serious about privacy will pick one up for a trip into/out of the US and dispose of it upon return.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Guess I better delete Handbrake from my notebook before crossing back.
If they have even a margin of a clue, this one would be THE product to nail you on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, my company will love this
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
pencil and paper
[ link to this | view in chronology ]