Seattle Honda/Toyota Dealer Decides To Try To Sell Cars Like Tesla Does, Rather Than Trying To Shut Tesla Down

DailyDirt: Life's Little Problems In Space

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Thu, Apr 9th 2015 5:00pm — Michael Ho

Space travel isn't easy. It's risky and involves quite a bit of preparation if the trip is going to last more than a few minutes or hours. But if humanity is really going to commit to space exploration, there are a few problems to solve. Life support systems are obviously going to need to protect our fragile bodies from radiation and the vacuum of space. On top of that, we also need to counteract the negative effects of microgravity on our health. Some people are thinking about these problems, but it's likely that we won't have solutions until at least 2030.

NASA officially forbids pregnancy in space due to the unknown hazards it presents to the unborn. If humans are going to colonize other worlds, we're going to need to figure out how to procreate in different environments -- and bring along 10,000-40,000 astronauts to keep the genetic diversity high (unless space explorers opt to do far more genetic engineering experiments than we do on earth). [url]
Plenty of people have volunteered for the Mars One mission -- a one-way trip to the red planet. A short documentary of a few of the people willing to die on Mars (or on the way) shows that these folks are a bit weird, but that they're not so crazy, either. [url]
Astronauts haven't been to the moon in a while, so we've almost forgotten all of the things they've done and left behind on the moon. Astronauts have slept for 8 hours on the moon. They've left behind all kinds of waste -- but not bags of vomit, apparently. [url]

After you've finished checking out those links, if you have some spare change (or more) and would like to support Techdirt, take a look at our Daily Deals for cool gadgets and other awesome stuff.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: apollo, astronauts, life support, mars, mars one, space, space exploration
Companies: nasa

12 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Dan G Difino, 9 Apr 2015 @ 5:55pm

Humans are such morons
To think humans should even be contemplating inhabitation of other planets even though it is moronic and pointless all the while humans are languishing in disasterous conditions on a perfectly inhabitable planet (earth) already is the biggest fricking joke of all. It should be unlawful and illegal to take resources from this planet for such idiotic endeavors. How about solving some major problems (energy, food, water, war) here on earth NASA before you go off on these ridiculously extravagent & costly missions that yield little if any meaningful and useful results that help mankind. Take a leap for mankind that actually helps mankind.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Roger Strong (profile), 9 Apr 2015 @ 11:36pm
  
  Re: Humans are such morons
  That was the argument in the mid-1960s, when NASA's budget was slashed and capped Saturn V production even before the first moon landing. Apollo coasted through the moon landings with what hardware was already in the pipeline.
  
  It's been 50 years. Are those earthly problems all solved yet? Do you need another five years?
  
  America's human space flight programs cost around $7 billion a year. Americans spend more than $154 billion a year on alcohol. They spend a similar amount on sugar water that's bad for them. And again on watching millionaires they'll never meet play organized sports.
  
  But hey, target the $7 billion instead. An investment that's already had a wonderful payback. And tell us more about what's "moronic and pointless."
  
  You want to "take a leap for mankind that actually helps mankind?" As a programmer, I believe in making backups. The same concept applies to humanity: Establishing a self-sustaining colony on another planet is a Very Good Idea.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - JoeCool (profile), 10 Apr 2015 @ 12:30am
    
    Re: Re: Humans are such morons
    Eventually, we'll need much more than simply other planets in the solar system, we'll need homes outside, and the further spread the better. One gamma ray burst to close to home and there's no more life in the entire system. Intelligent life is a race of science against cosmic catastrophe. Extinction level events are fairly common in the long run, so getting out of the system and settling far and wide is the only long term goal that doesn't result in the end of humanity.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 10 Apr 2015 @ 5:10am
  
  Re: Humans are such morons
  Must be sarcasm ... there are too many inconsistencies and stupid statements to be real.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lapsed Pastafarian (profile), 9 Apr 2015 @ 6:01pm

I agree with Heinlein
The earth is too fragile a basket to keep all our eggs in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2015 @ 6:28pm

Yeah, just "a few problems to solve".
And if dig into them, you'll find
likely insoluble. The laws of physics
are not optional. We can't simply scale
up or expect miracle tech. The past or
that mythical patent office bureaucrat
being wrong cannot overcome the known
problems. There's nothing in sight
which gives hope of people even getting
to Mars alive, let alone returning.

And I for one find it pleasing that
humans won't be infesting the universe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Roger Strong (profile), 9 Apr 2015 @ 11:20pm
  
  Re: Yeah, just "a few problems to solve".
  The big "insoluble law of physics" is the speed of light. It means that we won't be colonizing other star systems any time soon. (But given time, it's not a show stopper.)
  
  There are no "insoluble laws of physics" stopping us from colonizing the solar system. There's still a few engineering problems, but no "miracle tech" is needed.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mason Wheeler (profile), 10 Apr 2015 @ 6:55am
  
  Re: Yeah, just "a few problems to solve".
  We can't simply scale up or expect miracle tech.
  
  ...says the guy on the Internet.
  
  Look around you and see how many commonplace things in your day-to-day life, including your modern clothing and diet, would have been considered miraculous just 200 years ago.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 10 Apr 2015 @ 8:11am

With all the mutations from cosmic rays we shouldn't need as many people to keep our gene pool diverse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
JimG, 10 Apr 2015 @ 10:24am

Getting to the moon is trivial compared to creating a space colony in a different solar system with 10,000+ people. For an excellent discussion see:

http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2011/10/why-not-space/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Roger Strong (profile), 10 Apr 2015 @ 10:36am
  
  Re:
  For now we'll just have to be content with colonizing our own solar system.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Hop David (profile), 13 Apr 2015 @ 4:09pm
  
  Re:
  Lots of asteroids, moons and a few planets in our own neighborhood.
  
  Tom Murphy isn't particularly competent.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]