India And China Claim That ACTA Violates Earlier IP Agreements
from the at-least-someone's-fighting... dept
Recently, we noted that India and some other countries were gearing up to oppose ACTA, as it presents a huge problem for a variety of developing countries. India should know. It's still getting over the troubles created by TRIPS, which forced it to make some massive changes to its IP laws, which multiple studies have shown to have caused trouble for India. So it doesn't seem to keen to sign up for yet another, even more draconian, set of IP rules. Michael Geist points us to some notes from the recent WTO meeting where India (along with China, and some other developing nations) expressed their serious concerns with ACTA, including that it appears to violate the TRIPS agreement that they've already signed onto:Briefly, China's and India's lengthy statements argued that ACTA and other agreements could:Not too surprisingly, ACTA supporters hit back, but note how they avoid some of the bigger issues here:They also argued that the focus on enforcement did not take into account a country's level of development.
- Conflict with TRIPS Agreement (a reference to TRIPS Art.1.1) and other WTO agreements, and cause legal uncertainty
- Undermine the balance of rights, obligations and flexibilities that were carefully negotiated in the various WTO agreements
- Distort trade or create trade barriers, and disrupt goods in transit or transhipment
- Undermine flexibilities built into TRIPS (such as for public health, and trade in generic medicines)
- Undermine governments' freedom to allocate resources on intellectual property by forcing them to focus on enforcement
- Set a precedent that would require regional and other agreements to follow suit. (One example cited was negotiations involving CARIFORUM, the group of Caribbean states. However, a delegation representing CARIFORUM said it understood the concerns but denied that CARIFORUM would have to apply ACTA's provisions.)
A number of developing countries broadly supported the concern.
ACTA participants voiced their concerns about what they saw as a steadily increasing level of counterfeiting and piracy. They countered that the draft ACTA agreement will not conflict with TRIPS and other WTO provisions. They denied it would upset the negotiated balance, distort legitimate trade or undermine TRIPS flexibilities. One said generic medicines would not be affected since ACTA does not deal with patents.That claim about ACTA not dealing with patents is news to us. Both the leaked and the released draft still had language suggesting that at least some negotiators used language such that ACTA applied broadly to all intellectual property. If they're really dropping patents from ACTA, that would certainly be news. Jamie Love noted at a recent meeting that Steve Metalitz, who is a lawyer representing the entertainment industry, has said that patents are being dropped from ACTA. Hopefully it's true, but until we actually see that, who knows whether it's really happening.
They said that ACTA was necessary because counterfeiting is no longer a question of products such as fake luxury watches, but involves commercial scale production of fake medicines, car and aircraft parts and other products, which are dangerous to health and safety, and that developing countries are particularly vulnerable.
Some of them also said they had to get together outside the WTO because countries had opposed discussing enforcement substantively in the TRIPS Council.
As for the claims that ACTA is "necessary," that's clearly bogus. Also, it's amusing to note that the "necessary" part focuses on the typical fear mongering points of fake medicines. If they want to stop fake medicines and fake aircraft parts, fine. Then create a document that does that. The problem is that ACTA supporters hide under those claims to lump in a ton of unrelated stuff, which is where many of the concerns come from.
Separately, Love also notes that Metalitz claims that it's "not appropriate" for trading partners to discuss fair use in ACTA. Huh? This is an argument we've seen before, and it makes absolutely no sense. ACTA's copyright provisions include all sorts of aggressive enforcement requirements, and without clear fair use exceptions, those enforcement rules strip copyright of most of its key balancing points. The whole ACTA process continues to be a sham.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: acta, china, copyright, enforcement, india, intellectual property, patents, trips
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
but seriously im glad that someone realizes how stupid acta i, especially since they basically own half of america
[ link to this | view in thread ]
US citizens should be less sensitive to criticism and pay attention to the patterns of emerging tiranny. What is going on is:
1. Overly eager adoption of belic vocabulary. You guys are waging "war" over everything. Terrorism, drugs, piracy, BP's oil spill. Get a grip, folks.
2. Gradual elimination of individual rights to appease the industry. The easiest example to mention in Techdirt is the war on piracy, but it goes beyond that. Your public transportation is scrapped down to benefit auto makers. And don't get me started on pharmaceuticals and healthcare.
3. The official (by official I mean governmental) reaction to most criticism is an attempt to frame the critic as a terrorist or anti-american, in an ad-hominem strategy to dismiss the criticism.
Even if you disagree with points 1 and 2, I'd like to point out that you'll see massive evidence of point number 3 in the news in the following days, as news anchors talk about how evil India and China are. Enjoy your monolithic mass media, guys.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
new buttons
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nonsense and Redundancy
Such as?
One of the points made by India is the fact that such agreements already exist.
Once key problem with ACTA (besides it's clandestine nature) is the fact that music piracy is being conflated with counterfeit pharmaceuticals. It's like a bad piece of American legislation with all manner of stealth provisions and pork barrel projects attached to it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Knowledge and technology for human benefit is free
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Nonsense and Redundancy
"Once key problem with ACTA (besides it's clandestine nature) is the fact that music piracy is being conflated with counterfeit pharmaceuticals. " - in the end, they are the same thing. someone created it, others should not profit from that creation without permission.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Nonsense and Redundancy
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Nonsense and Redundancy
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Yes there are, and they are all about corporate profits, preventing competition, and granting monopoly rights to corporations.
You seem to be under the mistaken impression that ACTA will protect corporations and keep things unchanged. Short term it might, long term it wont. All this industry wish list does is create an artificial level of support. It makes any new disruptive technology much more likely to cause a major collapse in the industries ACTA is designed to protect.
Feel free to support ACTA all you want. History is full of examples of failures associated with this sort of protectionism.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nonsense and Redundancy
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oh ACTA
We have to find a way to inform the people of what is going on, I still haven't seen anything on the news or 60 Minutes or anything of that sort; people don't know what is going on and there are many companies that need for ACTA to become "law" yet the world needs for it to fail. If things like this are going to be the norm with ACTA what is going to happen to humanity?? We have to stand up and find a way to communicate, inform your friends and family and tell them to do the same! We need to shine a light on this matter so that people understand what is happening.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
i hope it gets enaacted and net use dies completely
people went underground with knowledge and they not only outlasted but grew in power enough they could challenge them.
SO we shall do same and go underground and hold it all safe n secret. ON TAPE REALS.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nonsense and Redundancy
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
you can sit there and say "oh there are plenty of good reasons for it" all day long.
but that does not make it a necessary thing that we cant live without.
besides, ACTA doesnt really align with most peoples world view. it really only aligns with those who seek to control IP as a means to keep archaic business methods that can not be supported in any other way in todays marketplace alive and kicking and those that profit from bribes kickbacks campaign donations and the insane amounts of legal fees
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nonsense and Redundancy
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Nonsense and Redundancy
Do as I say and not as I do?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Nonsense and Redundancy
Let's also completely ignore the fact that our rocket program came about when the GERMAN SCIENTISTS DEFECTED to the US. Sure. US Haters: Rewriting history all over, again.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ACTA
However you would have to admit that counterfeiting has been a problem for over forty years in parts used in the automobile, aerospace, transport and electrical industries. There are thousands of parts in circulation and many installed in aircraft.
It is happening mostly in Russia and former Soviet republics like Lithuania, Latvia etc. China and Russia have been serial offenders. The present Russian regime makes the Tsarist regime look positively benevolent.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Regardless
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ACTA participants expressed their concerns about what they saw as an increasing level of counterfeitingaudi tt turbocharger and piracy. They said that the draft ACTA agreement does not conflict with TRIPS and other WTO provisions. They denied that the negotiated balance, distort or undermine the legitimate trade of the TRIPS flexibilities. One said that generic drugs would not be affected because the ACT does not deal with patents.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
nice post
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]