Afghanistan Follows Pakistan In Demanding ISPs Censor The Internet

from the not-so-inter dept

Mon, Jun 28th 2010 11:12pm — Mike Masnick

Last week we noted that Pakistan had chosen to start censoring a bunch of big websites, including Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and Amazon. And now the EFF notes that Afghanistan has created new rules for the internet, saying that ISPs need to start filtering websites that fall under the following categories:

Alcohol
Dating/Social Networking
Gambling
Pornography

Because it's not easy to properly filter, reports coming out of the country suggest that ISPs are just choosing to block Facebook, Gmail, YouTube, and Twitter outright. It looks like more and more countries are deciding to censor the internet. This may not be a surprise, but it is a little upsetting if you believe in the importance of free expression.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: afghanistan, blocks, censorship

17 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Moo^2, 28 Jun 2010 @ 11:17pm

It seems that a lot of this could be done a lot easier by just outlawing the internet. just claim that the very concept of the internet is wrong for a variety of reasons and presto, no internet for you!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2010 @ 11:43pm

Drugs ?
It's interesting to see that they are not stopping drug related information.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Poster, 29 Jun 2010 @ 12:28am

As if Afghanistan didn't have enough problems.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
JackSombra (profile), 29 Jun 2010 @ 12:41am

And this is the government western troops are dying to keep in power
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jun 2010 @ 12:42am

why do you harp on countries that have no belief in free anything, thought, speech, rights etc...you act like this is truly newsworthy, or commenting on it will somehow make these countries see the error of their ways
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- PaulT (profile), 29 Jun 2010 @ 3:50am
  
  Re:
  Because idiots like yourself keep bringing up those other countries and trying to demand that "pirated" material is blocked by ISPs and other non-infringing parties?
  
  Because, if this is successful, people like the religious right will try to use this as precedent to stop speech they don't like (e.g. information on abortion or evolution)?
  
  Because it's a good thing to know about what is happening elsewhere in the world, even if it doesn't affect you directly?
  
  Because restriction on rights in other countries are still "newsworthy" even if you show no personal interest in them?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jun 2010 @ 4:04am
    
    Re: Re:
    So, let's pretend TAM isn't trolling right now. If he weren't trolling, his point would be:
    
    The headline "Pakistani Government Hacks Apart Bloggers With Machetes" isn't news; it's Tuesday.
    
    There is no point in showing any surprise when governments known for suppressing freedom actually suppress freedom.
    
    However, it is is good starting point for discussion on the state of other nations, which is a perfectly acceptable reason to have these articles.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Richard (profile), 29 Jun 2010 @ 4:14am
  
  Re:
  why do you harp on countries that have no belief in free anything, thought, speech, rights etc...you act like this is truly newsworthy, or commenting on it will somehow make these countries see the error of their ways
  Maybe because our governments are spending a lot of money (and lives) in military adventures in those countries - and therefore ought to have some leverage.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- abc gum, 29 Jun 2010 @ 5:00am
  
  Re:
  Are you suggesting the rest of the world go along with their insanity and censor all news about their problems? I'm positive there are those in more developed nations who would rejoice at the prospect of censoring all things they object to. Studying this phenomenon shows forethought and aknowledgement that someday, we too may be facing such intolerance.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 29 Jun 2010 @ 2:06pm
  
  Re:
  why do you harp on countries that have no belief in free anything, thought, speech, rights etc...you act like this is truly newsworthy, or commenting on it will somehow make these countries see the error of their ways
  
  I always figured you thought facist censorship was both admirable and mundane, TAM. Thanks for confirming it for the rest of us.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
falconcy (profile), 29 Jun 2010 @ 6:18am

They are censoring Internet for ISAF too
This has actually been on the cards for quite a while now, they have been demanding that resellers of VSAT Services comply too with heavy fines/having their licenses rescinded.

This has the knock on effect of censoring locally sourced VSAT access being provided to members of the Military serving there. The work around for those affected is to order services direct from the actual service providers and not from Afghan Resellers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NAMELESS.ONE, 29 Jun 2010 @ 6:56am

soldiers cant hand out dvdrs now
haha
OH i can see a rebellion....OH WAIT
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mr. CD (profile), 29 Jun 2010 @ 9:02am

Freedom of expression and sarcasm
Do corporate banking interests operate a propaganda machine that controls all expression? Is freedom of expression real when the sound of our voice is easily lost in the roar of that machine? Do the economic depression, gulf oil crisis and constant wars evidence how a few priviledged elite can afford to spread their opinions? Our leaders bathe in continuous extravagance, which clogs their ears to our voices anyway. Website filtering will be needed for we useless eaters, while the elite can always purchase more freedom.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Overtkill (profile), 29 Jun 2010 @ 9:11am

Umm....
They get internet access in Afghanistan? :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- ChrisB (profile), 29 Jun 2010 @ 11:47am
  
  Re: Umm....
  The average Afghan makes $1 a day. I'm sure they'll cry about the unavailability of online porn.
  
  But hey, on the bright side, I hear they are a democracy now!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
BruceLD, 29 Jun 2010 @ 11:17am

So?
Let them censor. They're doing it to copycat other countries that do it. Being egotistical dictators it makes them feel even more important and more powerful to know that the western press is talking about it.

If no one cared or paid attention they wouldn't be doing it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The Devil's Coachman (profile), 29 Jun 2010 @ 2:19pm
  
  We all know the real reasons for their censorship
  It's because the dictators running these countries are sexually inadequate, replete with afflictions such as micro-phallus and erectile dysfunction, and this is their way of feeling better about themselves. I may have micro-phallus myself, for all I know, but I don't try to censor the internet. What's up with them?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]