Dutch Court Questioning Why Police Outsourced File Sharing Evidence Collection To Industry Group
from the anti-piracy-group-is-not-the-police dept
We've seen numerous bad court rulings in the Netherlands when it comes to attacks on file sharing programs, and one of the big concerns was the seemingly all-too-close relationship between the anti-piracy organization BREIN and Dutch law enforcement. For example, it's still unclear how BREIN ended up with computer equipment from some of these file sharing operations. Police can confiscate equipment. Private industry groups cannot. It seems that relationship may now be creating some problems for BREIN, as a court is questioning why Dutch law enforcement brought criminal charges against a file sharing site, when it was clearly a civil issue that should have been taken up by BREIN.The specific case involves a lawsuit that was brought years back, where the owner of the site ShareConnector was eventually cleared on all charges. However, more recently, the Danish Department of Justice decided to appeal. However, TorrentFreak notes that the court has adjourned the case to ask why it's a criminal matter, and why, if it's a criminal matter, is BREIN so involved:
The Court wants the prosecutor to explain why the Department of Justice decided to go through with criminal proceedings in a case where a civil one would seem to be more suited. In The Netherlands copyright infringement related offenses fall under civil law unless they are very severe, which doesn't seem to be the case here.Perhaps BREIN and Dutch law enforcement groups will be reminded that BREIN is not, in fact, part of law enforcement, but a private industry group.
In addition, the Court weighs in that the evidence in this case has been collected by the Dutch anti-piracy outfit BREIN instead of the local authorities.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: civil, copyright, criminal, netherlands
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Remind us here to please
At least if Dutch courts are questioning this stuff it gives me slight hope that the US courts will do the same.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Remind us here to please
No it's not it's a reason for the US to start a trade embargo against the Dutch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Remind us here to please
They are locking up culture, criminalising natural and common behaviour, raping privacy, due diligence and process and people take it as if there will be no consequences to those things in the future(i.e. the industry will tell you what to do inside your own home).
Thank God there is alternatives that are still legal and for the time being difficult to spin as a bad thing as they use the same mechanism the bastard industry people is using.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Remind us here to please
They are locking up culture, criminalising natural and common behaviour, raping privacy, due diligence and process and people take it as if there will be no consequences to those things in the future(i.e. the industry will tell you what to do inside your own home).
Thank God there is alternatives that are still legal and for the time being difficult to spin as a bad thing as they use the same mechanism the bastard industry people is using.
There was a time when people loved things and imitate them there are some vestigial signs of that I don't see that happening for many shows these days though.
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/07/02/friends.china.central.perk/index.html?hpt =Sbin
Why is not those bastards running and trying to close "central perks" all over the planet?
A: They didn't know about it, now that they know they will claim copyright, patent on designs and say that re runs are hurting their sales.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Remind us here to please
Consumers don't care about this stuff. Consumers care about Lady Gaga.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
but it's tough to send people to jail in a civil case. this makes your "warning to others" that will somehow save your industry kind of toothless.
also, dutch law enforcement officials probably don't see any money from civil cases.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just because Danish looks a bit like Dutch, doesn't mean they are the same. :)
More on topic.
FINALLY! We've been saying for years that BREIN is not law enforcement, despite their grandstanding and them overstepping their boundaries. Let's hope BREIN gets slapped hard. They need to be put back in their place.
Next thing I hope will happen, is that industry groups are no longer allowed to set taxes on products. (Our blank media tax doesn't go to the state, but rather to an industry group)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Same thing isn't it? I thought private industry group and governments were the same. Ohhhh Noooooo Am I wrong?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
no, they are different. private industry groups make the demands and government fulfills them. the master has to be a separate entity from the slave, otherwise the master really isn't master of anything but himself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Of course, if you're government and private industry the citizenry doesn't exist. We're reduced to interest groups, stakeholders and dangerous extremists when we do things like demand our rights or ask for thinks like coherent and unspun explanations.
Oh to hell with it. Citizens are dangerous extremists. Every single one of them (us)!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
that it is done online n a digital format does not change the matter, as the only reason people are visiting the website (and earning the owner money) is for the purloined material.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Ill gotten?? Really? That's all you've got? What if the music was purchased legally and then copied, is it "still ill gotten"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
then again, you are smart enough to know that, and are trying to redirect the discussion away from my points. congrats. now all we need is rd and his alter ego namesless one to come in here and randomly capitalize some stuff to make my day complete.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The judge wants to know why this was pushed as a criminal case when it clearly should have been a civil case and wouldn't have involved the police in the first place.
And the judge wants to know (if it even was a criminal case)why the evidence was collected by a 3rd party with obvious biases instead of being collected by the police.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]