DailyDirt: The Legal Definition Of What You're Eating...
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
There are some bizarre legal definitions for common foods. For example, we've seen that the definition of a sandwich was under dispute because a burrito place was encroaching on a sandwich shop in a shopping mall food court. That case decided that a burrito was not a sandwich, but food experts don't all agree on that point. Here are a few other cases of defining some foods legally and not with your gut.- Unilever is suing a vegan "mayo" company because it doesn't use eggs in its product. The startup Hampton Creek may be benefiting from some publicity here, and its "Just Mayo" mayonnaise-like spread will likely sell more now. In the end, though, both Unilever and Hampton Creek (and any other condiment makers) may need to be more explicit about ingredients and make a clear distinction between mayo and mayo dressing. [url]
- In 1893, the Supreme Court decided that, under customs law, a tomato is a vegetable, not a fruit. A fruit importer was trying to get tomatoes into the US without having to pay the 10% import tax, so against biological definitions, the court ruled that vegetables were "usually served at dinner in, with, or after the soup, fish, or meats ... and not, like fruits generally, as dessert" -- and tomatoes were therefore a vegetable in everyday experience. [url]
- In 1981, the US Department of Agriculture had 90 days to come up with new standards for subsidized school lunch programs. The resulting new rules almost considered ketchup to be a vegetable, but the ketchup-counts-as-a-veggie policy was not adopted. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: condiments, food, ketchup, mayo, mayonnaise, sandwich, tomato
Companies: hampton creek foods, unilever, usda
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Seriously? A sandwich is filling served between two slices of bread. A burrito does not have slices of bread; it has the filling wrapped in a tortilla. What room is there for disagreement on something so simple?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Definitions
That's your definition. Arguably, a sandwich is a construction of meat and bread which allows the person to eat it without holding the filling (look up the history of the invention of the sandwich). A burrito would be covered by my definition.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Fail. A tortilla is unleavened bread.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
All this dumbing down of food so that even the most idiotic wanker can simply ask for a 'sammich' (god, kill those people, please!) without having to learn what they're actually eating.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
"Sandwich" may be correct, but "sammiches" are fun and "sammidges" rock.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What hair are you going to split?
Tortilla is a flatbread. So it qualifies as a sandwich.
Unless you can dig up the Earl of Sandwich, any definition is likely arbitrary. Although that's fine too so long as everyone is aware of what that arbitrary definition is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In the context of a mall writing a lease that grants an exclusive sandwich market to a single business, a burrito arguably shouldn't count as a sandwich. The lease clearly didn't mean to exclude all other food places, or it would have been more broadly written. And a burrito, typically filled with rice and beans, and fully wrapped, isn't all that close to a submarine sandwich or a burger. (A 'wrap' might result in a different decision, but that's not at issue here.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/45306416/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/t/pizza-vegetable-congress- says-yes/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If the argument is going to be over exact definitions and phrasing, well, "technically correct is the best kind of correct".
And don't try to construct a definition that is so general such that you end up with an absurd result such as donuts, Oreos, fried chicken or tempura fitting the category.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandwich
and the line of persons that honorarium related to:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_of_Sandwich
But the most important view came from a 'sandwich theory' class I took a long time ago. Not only were the varieties of sandwich types, ingredients, containers (forms of bread), design and presentations discussed and experimented with, but commonalities amongst almost all of those. Two of those commonalities stood out.
First up, the spread goes on the bread. Whether you are using mayonnaise, butter, olive oil, or some other, this ingredient is intended to help the bread pass more smoothly (remember, bread was not always the very refined thing we view it as today in certain parts of the world) and is not intended normally as a flavor additive.
Second, the mustard goes on the meat. Whatever condiment one uses beyond the spread, is intended to flavor the filling. Cranberries on turkey, mustard on ham, or beef, or chicken, or turkey for that matter (in that sandwich, I would leave the cranberries out), or whatever your cuisine inspires.
This comment is aimed at the multitudes of inept sandwich makers in the commercial world, who once determining that you want mustard and mayonnaise on your sandwich proceed to slather one side of the bread with mayo, and the other with mustard, failing to consider the storied history and craft of professional sandwich making.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Flowers are red...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Flowers are red...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Flowers are red...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Flowers are red...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Flowers are red...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...and another thing.
The typical liberal media narrative of "the underdog is the good guy" simply doesn't work here.
Unilever is simply doing what the feds should have done already.
No foodie anywhere (including) Vegans should put up with this crap. It's insulting.
"You are stupid ignorant gits and we can take advantage of you at will."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ...and another thing.
Nice soap box you got there, what is this liberal media of which you speak?
Most uses of the terms liberal and conservative do so because the source does not regurgitate the desired extreme talking points.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]