A Paywall... For Obituaries?
from the seriously? dept
We've seen all sorts of paywall ideas for newspapers, some more ridiculous than others, but this one seems really bizarre. We've been waiting for some time to see the details of Stephen Brill's paywalls-for-newspapers company, Journalism Online, and apparently the first "in the wild" test for the system will be with LancasterOnline, the website of a small newspaper in south-central Pennsylvania... and the paywall will only cover the obituaries section. Yes, you read that right. You can read seven obits for free, but if you have eight friends who died this month, you'll have to pay an additional $1.99 per month to keep reading their obits.Separately, it appears that Journalism Online's "paywall" system is so weak that even the company itself is highlighting ways to get around the paywall (turn off javascript, use noscript, use multiple browsers or delete your cookies), saying basically they don't think many people will actually bother to do any of those things. Of course, most people also won't bother to pay, so perhaps we can call it even.
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: obituaries, paywall
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Just like TAMs mom.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LMAO!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obits
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Up against the worlds best... they make it less useful
I don't see how they will add value even close to what twitter provides.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Up against the worlds best... they make it less useful
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
From the article:
I think this one deserves a double-facepalm...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dammit jim im a doctor not a .....
sad just real damn sad.
HEY who died today....
I ain't paying to see it...
{shakes head walks off}
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sorry, this actually makes sense to me...
Furthermore, one of the ideas behind the metered model is to try to identify the kinds of users who might actually be in a position to pay for content. I'd argue that obits is a good fit here, too: anyone looking at that many obits in a month might just be a researcher.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sorry, this actually makes sense to me...
So you pick a section no one is going to pay for? How is that a smart experiment?
Furthermore, one of the ideas behind the metered model is to try to identify the kinds of users who might actually be in a position to pay for content. I'd argue that obits is a good fit here, too: anyone looking at that many obits in a month might just be a researcher.
And how many "researchers" do you think there are who would pay? Quick do the math on how many there are, how many will pay, and the cost of setting up a paywall.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sorry, this actually makes sense to me...
Obituaries are public announcements - intended to inform as many people as possible about a death. Walling them behind a paywall is like sending Christmas cards postage-due. All this does is drive away readers.
The only people that would pay to see obits would be the ones that know there is someone in them that they care about - way to fleece the people that have recently lost a loved one. Oh, and if you already know that someone is in the obits and you really want to read about it, you are likely to want to buy the paper copy for posterity anyway.
I'm still amazed the executives at newspapers have their jobs. They seem to flop around aimlessly hoping to accidentally come across money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sorry, this actually makes sense to me...
How the heck do you expect them to figure out how to sign up and get access to their dying friend's obituaries behind a paywall?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike here is a great line for a future story ...
Please use it when Rupert Murdochs paywalls fail ... :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Competing with Free
This is actually an interesting business issue: a recurring problem with online obituaries is how to make money tastefully. I'm hoping the startup mentioned in the link manages to develop a business model that doesn't sound like squeezing dollars out of the bereaved (even if funeral homes swear by it)/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]