Estate Of Author Who Claims JK Rowling Copied Her Work Sues Again
from the keep-on-suing-on dept
A year ago, we wrote about the latest (in a decently long line) of authors who claimed that JK Rowling "plagiarized" some other book for her Harry Potter works. The evidence is always pretty much lacking, and the details suggest a failed author who had a book that had a few loose similarities. In this case, the estate of the author sued Bloomsbury, who published the books in the UK. But, apparently, that's not enough. The estate is filing a similar lawsuit in the US, because maybe one of those lawsuits will actually lead to money. Of course, the real likelihood is that this is a weak attempt at using the court systems to try to get attention for a failed book.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, harry potter, jk rowling, plagiarism
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As you point out, though, he doesn't really need the publicity of a spurious plagiarism lawsuit, being fairly well-known.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"fairly well-known"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "fairly well-known"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Don't worry that's coming to an end soon. I wonder what Mike will do when it does ... ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
...unfortunately, it's long past its "mature" date.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Really? Is the world ending or something?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rowling Plagiarism
However there is nothing unusual about that. That is how culture develops. (The books I mention as "sources" are themselves all derived from earlier works.)
The main problem is that she has not done a good job of the plagiarism - since her books are all decidedly inferior to her source material in just about every respect.
However to claim that she copied from some unknown author is ridiculous - since she obviously had no need to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jacobs vs Rowling and Scholastic
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Horowitz vs H.P.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Horowitz vs H.P.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]