More Porn Companies Filing Mass Lawsuits Against File Sharers
from the easier-to-get-people-to-pay-up dept
While lots of attention has been paid to US Copyright Group, and its effort to bring mass automated copyright infringement "pre-settlement letters" to the US, it's worth remembering that the pioneers of this sort of thing, Davenport Lyons and ACS:Law, used a lot of porn movie makers early on. That might be because that's who first hired them... or, it might be because everyone involved figured that it was much easier to get people to pay up quickly and quietly if they were accused of downloading gay porn, rather than having to go to trial over the issue. This is not, of course, to say there's anything wrong with gay porn for those into that sort of thing, but in general, most people probably don't want to have it broadcast to the world that they're involved in any sort of lawsuit over downloaded porn, gay or straight, with the case for settling being even more compelling for those who were not openly gay.It appears that a similar calculus may have brought such lawsuits over to the US. It's not clear if this is part of any coordinated campaign by a law firm, as we've seen elsewhere, but THREsq reports that 65 "John Does" have been sued for accessing a gay porn movie via BitTorrent in a Texas court.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Funny ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Funny ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Funny ....
Also
"Beers and Steers" ??? not being from texas I dont get the phrase. Or does it have to do with the band that O.N.John did the song from?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Funny ....
Steers: must be referring to the longhorn steer. There are lots of them here.
Beers: Sadly, there are not enough microbreweries here yet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Funny ....
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=land%20of%20steers%20and%20queers
So I would argue that there is a 50% chance the defendant would get off in this case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Funny ....
beers, steers, and queers: cowboys
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPVC8Y4aJdc&feature=PlayList&p=DC8688DAF049DDA9& playnext_from=PL&index=0&playnext=1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seems like a small number of people for a sham
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
small number
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Private tracker?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Assuming IP address = specific person is the objection I have.
By the way, so far as I know, IP address is the sole *reliable* identification you can get from a torrent client, as the ID strings they send out can be changed at will.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Noooooo, it are my birthday!
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100712/02542710174.shtml
Porn industry is not gonna kill itself because there'll be always people producing porn. But the CURRENT players of the porn industry are gonna destroy themselves if they keep pursuing the copyright madness path. I'm not actually Ron Jeremy, by the way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
1. Go to court to ask the Judge to issue a order demanding that the ISP's release the names and addresses of suspected Copyright infringers (this has been done)
2. Send threatening letters to the suspected copyright infringers,
3. tell said people in the letter that if they fight the claim, then they will take the person to court and they will ask for many times the demand in the letter.
4. tell the people in the letter that they can make it all go away for a "small sum" in UK this is between £250 - £700.
5.Tell the people in the letter that it will cost many times this amout to contest and they will ask the judge to charge you with the their costs.
6. Ignore any Letters of Denial and just send another letter raising the cost
7. wait for the people to pay.
8. never have any intention of taking people to court, just "prey on the ones that pay"
As stated this has been ongoing with a few firms in UK:
ACS Law are the main ones, total letters sent - Enough to make them over 1Million pounds this year.
Gallant McMillan, new firm, just sent 1500 letters on behalf of "Ministry of Sound"
Davenport-Lyons - withdrew from the business when their reputation suffered. 2 of their solicitors are still under investigation by the Solicitors Regulating Authority.
Tilly Baily-Ervine - withdrew from the business when their reputation suffered.
This entire "business Model" has been called a "scam" and "Legal Blackmail" in the House of Lords
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwKbQVzR ... re=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORBfs3QC ... re=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5GaZV8O ... re=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkPHV-U3 ... re=related
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RE: Good bedfellows (pun intended)...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The same thing is happening in UK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORBfs 3QCvTY&feature=related
Sorry got the links wrong
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is the content legal???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is the content legal???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Joining all the parties
Of course, I'm sure there cases that go against it as well. Essentially the holding was that several people acting independently, but performing similar actions (i.e. downloading porn) doesn't satisfy the same transaction test in the FRCP.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]