DailyDirt: Computers Are Learning How To Play More Video Games, But They'll Never Appreciate A Good Game?

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Researchers can program computers to play all kinds of games and even beat the best humans at them. So far, we're not worried about AI that can beat us at chess or Jeopardy, but maybe we'll be more worried when a computer can program another computer to play chess at a grandmaster level. Luckily, there's at least one billionaire willing to chip in a few million bucks to try to keep Terminators from destroying humanity. If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post via StumbleUpon.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: ai, artificial intelligence, atari, civilization v, elon musk, flappy bird, game algorithms, machine learning, robotics, video games, wargames
Companies: deepmind, google


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Mar 2015 @ 5:40pm

    Did 'Nuclear Gandhi' emerge at any point during this AI game?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Mar 2015 @ 6:38pm

    I'd pay a buck to see two AIs argue about ethics in gaming journalism.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      orbitalinsertion (profile), 3 Mar 2015 @ 7:27pm

      Re:

      I'd up the bid to see 2 or more AIs pretend that that was what they were arguing about when in reality it is about something else entirely.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 3 Mar 2015 @ 10:55pm

        Re: Re:

        If, after 2 minutes of arguing, I find myself wishing that all the AIs would shut up & drop dead, they'll have passed the Turing Test.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    orbitalinsertion (profile), 3 Mar 2015 @ 7:29pm

    Civ V match

    So, not so much like having the game play both sides in PTO.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Shree, 3 Mar 2015 @ 11:29pm

    Well a billionaire has agreed to save humanity. Today it's games and tomorrow it will be people. Why are we even encouraging this.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Rekrul, 4 Mar 2015 @ 11:24am

    Those Atari games are more difficult than you might think...

    There's no correlation between simple graphics and ease of gameplay. A game can have state of the art graphics and be a cakewalk to play, or have really simple graphics and be insanely difficult.

    Plus, many later Atari games were quite deep for the time. Games like Tunnel Runner, Escape from the Mindmaster, Dragonstomper, Star Raiders, Mountain King, Montezuma's Revenge, Solaris, etc.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      John Fenderson (profile), 5 Mar 2015 @ 8:22am

      Re:

      "There's no correlation between simple graphics and ease of gameplay."

      Or quality of gameplay. Most of the games that are the most fun to play happen to be older ones with low quality graphics. I have noticed, personally, that there is a loose inverse correlation between graphics quality and game quality: much like with movies, the better the graphics the higher the odds that the game isn't that good. There are plenty of exceptions, of course, but it seem a good rule of thumb. I think it has a lot to do with where the development resources are used.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Rekrul, 5 Mar 2015 @ 11:39am

        Re: Re:

        Or quality of gameplay. Most of the games that are the most fun to play happen to be older ones with low quality graphics. I have noticed, personally, that there is a loose inverse correlation between graphics quality and game quality: much like with movies, the better the graphics the higher the odds that the game isn't that good. There are plenty of exceptions, of course, but it seem a good rule of thumb. I think it has a lot to do with where the development resources are used.

        Today it seems that graphics are considered more important than good gameplay.

        Although I'm guilty of liking gorgeous graphics, I don't like a lot of conventions used in modern games. Like the over use of cutscenes/FMVs, having the game be stuck in a sort of permanent tutorial mode (Press [X] to open door!), not allowing you to explore, having to press a separate key to "aim", including DLC in the game which is unlocked with a code that you buy, DLC that should have been in the base game, achievements for every stupid thing you do in the game (Achievement unlocked: Standing in place for ten seconds!), motion blur, haze making everything look like there's a smog problem, extensive focus on multi-player with the single-player campaign treated almost as an afterthought, separate camera controls in third-person games (is there anyone who though that Jedi Academy was difficult to play because you couldn't look at your character from any angle?), automatically regenerating health, using checkpoints rather than allowing you to save the game, and more that I'm probably forgetting.

        I don't have a state of the art system, but even if I did, I'd still prefer playing many of the older games over anything newer. Plus, the fact that I refuse to buy any games that requires online activation (Steam, Origin, etc) means that there's virtually nothing today that I would be willing to spend money on.

        link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.