DailyDirt: It's Not Just A Good Idea... It's Moore's Law
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
Computers are such an important part of our daily lives now that it's difficult to imagine how we could get along without them sometimes. Obviously, people do. But growing accustom to supercomputer capabilities available at our fingertips all the time is much more than a luxury. We expect computers to get better and better at an astonishing (exponential) rate, but will we notice if/when that rate slows down? Here are just a few links on keeping up -- or possibly exceeding -- the performance expectations that Moore's Law has instilled in us.- IBM has unveiled a 7nm chip -- the world's first commercially-viable and functioning chip using silicon-germanium materials produced with extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography. Moore's Law is beginning to show some cracks now, but this test chip shows the game isn't over just yet. [url]
- A working memory-crunching computer (memcomputer) prototype (the first of its kind) has been demonstrated by solving an NP-complete problem. This kind of computer requires a completely different design so that it can simultaneously process and store information -- unlike conventional computers which can't. Memprocessors (built from components such as memristors, memcapacitors, etc) can be made, but scaling them up is still a challenge -- so it'll be a while before anyone is making a memsupercomputer (or a supermemcomputer?). [url]
- Ditching transistors (or even memristors) completely could be a solution to ridiculously fast computers, and the way to get there might be quantum computing qubits. The trick is constructing qubits that are stable, error-free and scalable. So far, a 1000+ qubit computer has been made recently, but this quantum computer requires various superconducting components chilled to a nearly absolute zero temperature -- so it won't be used in laptops anytime soon. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: computing, memcomputer, memcomputing, memristors, moore's law, np-complete, quantum computing, qubits, silicon, supercomputers, transistors
Companies: d-wave, hp, ibm
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
what a crock of crap
Things have already slowed down and it happened more than 20 years ago. I can remember working with Lotus123 and thinking it was great most of the time, but it would sometimes take 2-3 seconds to return. That was annoying. That is absolutely *normal* with todays spreadsheets. Response times should be near instantaneous and they are not. Using a computer is often a disruption of the thought process because of feature bloat.
Computers should be fast. They are not. They haven't been for twenty years.
It's sad when you have to dump tables to disk then use perl to glean info out of them because using the normal user interface is so excruciatingly slow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: what a crock of crap
Leaving you back where you started.
But Moore's Law isn't crap. It's just balanced by the anti-Moore's Law of Software Bloat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: what a crock of crap
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: what a crock of crap
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: what a crock of crap
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: what a crock of crap
Yes they are more expensive but if calculated the time saved for the employees involved the more expensive hardware would come out cheaper.
Time is money folks, get the good shit or you have to wait for your shit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]