The Need For Anti-SLAPP Laws: Developer Sues Author, Publisher, Academic Who Praised Book & Reporter That Reviewed Book
from the lawsuit-bender dept
We've been discussing the need for a federal anti-SLAPP law for a while, to protect people against frivolous lawsuits designed solely to get people not to speak up. Citizen Media Law Group is alerting us to a case in Texas that is calling more attention to the issue, and getting lawmakers much more interested in at least improving anti-SLAPP laws in Texas. It involves a book about a real estate project by Dallas developer H. Walker Royall, which Royall apparently did not appreciate:When Dallas developer H. Walker Royall found out about an impending book digging into one of his projects, he went on a lawsuit bender.Uh, yeah. As someone who has blurbed a couple of books, that seems ridiculous. Suing the person who writes a blurb for the book, or a review of the book, claiming that they're somehow responsible? Blatantly ridiculous. The article notes that Epstein was dropped from the case for jurisdiction reasons, and Lardas and the newspaper "settled" with Royall (which seems like a bad precedent as well). However, the lawsuit against the author and the publisher is still going on, and it's drawing more attention to the need for anti-SLAPP laws.
He sued the author, Carla Main, and her publisher, Encounter Books. He sued Richard Epstein -- the prominent libertarian academic -- for a blurb he wrote praising the book. He sued Mark Lardas, who reviewed the book, and the Galveston County Daily News for publishing the review.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: anti-slapp, carla main, free speech, h. walker royall, slapp, texas
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The Rich use law as a bludgeon.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The Rich use law as a bludgeon.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The Rich use law as a bludgeon.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
those that are not are less 'trustworthy' and more 'easily replaced'
modern 'democracy's main job is to make it impossible for that to happen. It has nothing to do with representation and Everything to do with stability.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
In most states of the Union you can be slapped by the law by calling others a "retard".
Defamation per se.
Allegations or imputations "of loathsome disease" (historically leprosy and sexually transmitted disease, now also including mental illness)
Strict liability
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_liability
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Resources.
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encycl opedia/article-29718.html
http://www.eff.org/issues/bloggers/legal/liability/defamation
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That is the question I most want answered, I feel the law is an enabler of bad behavior, a threat to society and freedom.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Simple
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The first to fold in what would probably be considered a first amendment case. Wow, I hope we can find a way to save all these pieces of $&#@.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I'm sure in was nobody important. Camp counselor or something.
[ link to this | view in thread ]