Former Patent Attorney Turned Patent Litigant... Sues Other Patent Lawyers

from the the-devil-you-know dept

A growing number of patent attorneys who have worked on cases for patent hoarders have realized that it's such a lucrative game (and it really is a game -- one that wastes money and harms innovation -- but a game, nonetheless) that they've jumped ship, either getting or buying patents themselves and launching lawsuits. An anonymous reader points us to one such lawyer who didn't only do that, but has chosen a rather interesting target for his patent lawsuits: other patent lawyers. Yes, that's right. Patent lawyer Wes Whitmeyer apparently got a couple of patents (5,895,468 and 6,182,078) covering ways to manage patent payments, and he's now going after other law firms.
What's particularly unusual is who Whitmeyer is targeting: IP law firms, which are trained to either dish out the pain--or parry the blows--on behalf of others, but rarely find themselves accused of patent infringement. But no less than eight law firms are now in that position, thanks to Whitmeyer's patent claims.

In June, through his patent-holding company WhitServe LLC, Whitmeyer sued seven law firms: Brinks Hofer Gilson & Leone; Dinsmore & Shohl; Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aranoff; Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge, Kusner & Jaffe, Mueting, Raasch & Gebhardt; and Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr.
Apparently, Whitmeyer has sued a bunch of companies that make software for managing patent payments (how the hell is that not an obvious offering?), and won one of the lawsuits. The law firms listed above are apparently all customers of that firm, CPi. So, beyond attacking other patent attorneys, Whitmeyer is double dipping here. This is allowed, but it's yet another example of how ridiculously distorted the patent system has become.

The article also points out some other incredible parts of this story. CPi, which has been in business for over half a century, is being accused of willful infringement and for copying Whitmeyer's patents. CPi's CEO claims that's false, and notes that he'd never heard of Whitmeyer until he sued CPi. But where it gets really ridiculous is that Whitmeyer's lawyers are asking the court to increase damages just because CPi's CEO called Whitmeyer's patents "silly." Who knew that expressing an opinion on egregious patents might get you hit with greater damages?

This sort of situation is not what the patent system is supposed to encourage.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: patent attorneys, patents
Companies: cpi, whitserv


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    AdamR (profile), 8 Sep 2010 @ 12:40pm

    Talk about breeding and eating your own kind,

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Jay (profile), 8 Sep 2010 @ 12:52pm

    See what I said about incentive?

    I swear... It's like I don't even know how to ask about how we can change the incentives anymore. It just seems like the Supreme Court has to come down and tell people "sue in bad faith, get convicted, you pay court costs"

    Right now, the entire system really is wonky.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    MrWilson, 8 Sep 2010 @ 12:59pm

    It's nice to see them attacking each other for once. No honor among dogs who eat other dogs apparently.

    I guess it's too much to hope that maybe they'll destroy each other and leave the rest of the people who actually produce something alone.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    The Infamous Joe (profile), 8 Sep 2010 @ 1:01pm

    Circle the wagons

    I'm with you, Mike, I hate people like this. :)

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Danny, 8 Sep 2010 @ 1:06pm

    Lower than theives

    I mean damn there's even some degree of honor among theives. This should proof positive that the patent system is a mess that needs to be cleaned up badly.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Sep 2010 @ 1:08pm

    We need a loser pays system...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Nina Paley (profile), 8 Sep 2010 @ 1:09pm

    On the bright side

    another patent lawyer dropped out and became one of the most lucid critics of IP.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Sep 2010 @ 1:15pm

    Readers interested in this post might also be interested in a story I wrote about Whitmeyer's company last month, located here.

    http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202464370148

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Joe Mullin, 8 Sep 2010 @ 1:16pm

    Whitmeyer story

    Whoops, I didn't mean to be an AC!

    The previous comment and link was left by me.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Sep 2010 @ 1:35pm

    Do we still need more proof that the system has a problem and needs severe changes?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    out_of_the_blue, 8 Sep 2010 @ 2:42pm

    Dog-eat-dog capitalism.

    Combined with the lawyer's medieval guild. Both looting a dying civilization.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Sep 2010 @ 3:21pm

    Lawyers fighting lawyers? I see no problem here.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Sep 2010 @ 6:09pm

    Doggy dog world?

    The law give it, the law take it.

    Then some people don't understand why so many people are starting to ignore the law.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    abc gum, 8 Sep 2010 @ 7:05pm

    Satire IRL

    Wow - this is excellent !

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    JShen, 8 Sep 2010 @ 7:15pm

    Stop with the "patent system is broken" nonsense

    It is so easy to blame and say that the patent system is broken. The patent system's primary purpose is to encourage innovation. If it stops encouraging innovation, then the system can be called broken. Just because other activities are happening does not mean that the patent system is broken. To the extent that a patent system can stimulate innovation, it is still working. Nothing's perfect. This is just a case of an individual attorney trying to make some money.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 8 Sep 2010 @ 8:37pm

      Re: Stop with the "patent system is broken" nonsense

      "It is so easy to blame and say that the patent system is broken. "

      It's so easy to say that 1 + 2 = 2. Lets try and argue that it's five instead.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 8 Sep 2010 @ 8:16pm

    This Could Be A Good Thing

    The first sign of the whole patent system imploding?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Sep 2010 @ 8:30pm

    A patent lawyer with a patent on patent trolling is suing patent lawyers for patent trolling.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Sep 2010 @ 10:32pm

    "This sort of situation is not what the patent system is supposed to encourage"

    That's an assumption which seems to fly in the face of all available evidence. Just because that's not why the patent system was created, it doesn't mean it's not what the current system is supposed to encourage.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    ds, 9 Sep 2010 @ 2:56am

    What a bunch of average_joes...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    zub, 9 Sep 2010 @ 8:48am

    Meta-trolling

    Wow, so here we have meta-trolling. What about meta-meta-trolling, or more generally (meta)^N-trolling?:)

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    NY Patent Attorney, 14 Sep 2010 @ 9:23pm

    His bio indicates that he was lead counsel in Knorr-Bremse, both at the trial and appellate level. It doesn't say who he has worked for in the past.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.