Man Trademarks 'Welcome To Parry Sound,' Demands Money From Parry Sound Organizations
from the ah,-trademark-law dept
You may have noticed that as the field of "intellectual property law" has been getting more and more attention, those who benefit the most from it have done an effective, if misleading, job of convincing people that copyright, patents and trademark are "just like property." That's not true of course, and it's especially misleading when it comes to trademark law, which is designed to prevent consumer confusion, not to provide incentives, like copyright or patent law. But, all too frequently, we see people think that if they can somehow get a registered trademark on a term, it means they can prevent others from using it. Perhaps the most famous case was that of Leo Stoller who got trademarks on a variety of words, such as "stealth," and then started demanding everyone who used those words pay up.It appears that Stoller is not alone in this game, and this latest example may have taken a misinterpretation of trademark law to another level altogether. Reader Project P1 points us to the news that a guy named Nick Slater was somehow able to secure a trademark on the term "Welcome to Parry Sound." Parry Sound, of course, is a small town in Ontario. Now that Slater has the trademark, he's been invoicing lots of organizations for daring to use the phrase "welcome to Parry Sound," in any way. Thankfully, the various lawyers of those invoiced have all said, clearly, that there's no trademark issue here and not to pay, but Slater isn't giving up. Town residents have been protesting by putting up "Welcome to Parry Sound" signs on their lawn, and one guy set up a "Welcome to Parry Sound" Facebook group.
Slater's response? He sent that guy an invoice as well... and then filed a takedown claim with Facebook which blindly complied.
There is no legitimate trademark claim here, but once again, we're seeing what the concept of "intellectual property" is creating, with people thinking they can own basic things like a town greeting.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: nick slater, parry sound, trademark, welcome to parry sound
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You're violating my copyrights
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You're violating my copyrights
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Going to be rich!
Welcome to Ohio - Cha Ching!
Welcome to San Francisco - Cha Ching!
Welcome to Siberia - Cha Ching!
I hope nobody realizes places of the world have an established date (ie Parry Sound of 1857) prior to my trademarks thus nullifying my lawsuit. Not like there are maps, guidebooks, amusement parks, etc that have used "Welcome to " for decades prior to this. But I am sure nobody will have thought to look that deep into it.
*stares like a deer in the headlights*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Going to be rich!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Since "he’s an engineer" I would say anti-IP troll. I could be wrong but he did give me a great idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
(Devil's Advocate)
And yet, there are good things which have come out of the whole 'intellectual property' craze. For example, due to restrictive licensing on the 'glottal stop' that particular sound is almost entirely absent in all modern languages.
[/satire]
; P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More info at
and
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=129265980432654
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Poor Moron In A Hurry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Registrability
If you took the time to understand the Canadian trade mark process, you would understand why the mark went through to registration. Canadian trade mark law does not allow Examiners to deny registration on the basis of non-distinctiveness. The mark in question is in no way "clearly descriptive" of the goods or services associated with the application, so the mark proceeded to advertisement. The public at large had 2 months within which to file an opposition to the registration of this mark. It most definitely would have fallen in the opposition process, but nobody bothered to oppose the mark. The only way to get rid of this guy now is through the Federal Court...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Registrability
And, I'm thinking that after that we'll be told by the Tories (and the Grits) that we have to do things this way because of our international obligations under ACTA, which isn't finished and hasn't seen the light of day in the Commons yet.
Gawd, we're such a stupid country sometimes!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Registrability
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WELCOME TO PARRY SOUND
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Still invoicing
Courts have found that non-misleading use of trademarks in URLs and domain names of critical websites is fair. Companies can get particularly annoyed about these uses because they may make your post appear in search results relating to the company, but that doesn't give them a right to stop you.Anyone can sell diesel fuel even though one company has trademarked DIESEL for jeans. Only holders of "famous" trademarks, like CocaCola, can stop use in all categories, but even they can't block non-commercial uses of their marks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]