DailyDirt: The Little Things In Physics Make Big News

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Wed, Jul 11th 2012 5:00pm — Michael Ho

Scientific discoveries often build upon past scientific discoveries, and it looks like investments in huge particle colliders are really paying off now. But even without gigantic particle accelerators, physicists have been taking some cool measurements recently. Here are just a few examples of some significant discoveries in physics that are verifying some of our models of how the universe works.

CERN has cautiously announced the discovery of the Higgs Boson particle with a mass-energy of about 125-126 GeV. There's a lot of verification that still needs to be done, but it looks like they've found the "God particle" that explains how all matter has mass. CERN also said there's about a 0.000057% statistical chance of this measurement being wrong. [url]
The faster-than-light neutrino that was seen in 2011... isn't actually faster than light. The cause of the measurement error was determined to be a loose cable. So no time traveling for you! [url]
Some astrophysicists say they've discovered a filament of dark matter between two galaxy clusters about 2.7 billion light years away. This filament of dark matter appears to be around 58 million light years long, and the astronomers were lucky to find two galaxies oriented in a way that allowed them to measure the effects of this dark matter trail. [url]

If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: astrophysicists, cern, dark matter, god particle, higgs boson, neutrino, physics, science

15 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 11 Jul 2012 @ 5:06pm

FTL neutrinos
seriously, a loose cable!?! how can a loose cable make particles look like they're traveling faster than LIGHT?!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
  
  Anonymous Coward, 11 Jul 2012 @ 5:18pm
  
  Re: FTL neutrinos
  how can a loose cable make particles look like they're traveling faster than LIGHT?!
  
  Do your brain cell get lonely?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 11 Jul 2012 @ 5:35pm
  
  Re: FTL neutrinos
  sounds like a pretty weak cover story.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 11 Jul 2012 @ 10:39pm
  
  Re: FTL neutrinos
  Very very easily. A loose cable can mask the time of departure making it seem like the particles left a few nanoseconds than it actually did.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 12 Jul 2012 @ 3:21am
  
  Re: FTL neutrinos
  The calculated transit time of the electronic signal over that cable was being subtracted from the measured time of arrival of the neutrinos at Gran Sasso, to compensate for signal delays. Because the cable was loose, the signal was taking longer than calculated to reach its end, by 54 nanoseconds I think it was. Hence the neutrinos were thought to be arriving that much sooner.
  
  54 nanoseconds is the time it takes for light (or the neutrinos) to travel 18 metres. The 700km distance between the LHC and Gran Sasso was known accurately enough to discern a timing discrepancy that small.
  
  High-energy physics is a complicated business these days. It took 3 years of careful checking before the researchers concluded that they couldn�t find any obvious source of the error. And even after the result was released, it took more than another year before the loose cable was discovered.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - JoeCool (profile), 12 Jul 2012 @ 2:35pm
    
    Re: Re: FTL neutrinos
    54 nanoseconds is the time it takes for light (or the neutrinos) to travel 18 metres.
    
    Damn! That was one loose cable! I've never seen a fiber optic cable that was 18m "loose" before and still worked, but I guess that CERN gets good parts. ;) :D
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 Jul 2012 @ 5:20pm

Correction: DOES your brain cell get lonely?
OK?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 11 Jul 2012 @ 6:21pm

�God Particle�
Just a note that that is a sanitized/shortened version of �goddamned particle� (probably because of the difficulty of finding it), there is no deep religious significance to its existence, OK?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Pixelation, 11 Jul 2012 @ 7:40pm
  
  Re: �God Particle�
  It's nice that they were finally able to lift the universe's kilt and see it's God particles.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Blake, 11 Jul 2012 @ 8:00pm

Does the 0.000057% statistical chance of this measurement being wrong take into account a loose cable as well?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Torg (profile), 12 Jul 2012 @ 3:00am
  
  Re:
  Probably. Measuring the existence of a particle isn't the kind of thing that can be easily faked by some delayed messaging. Those are very complicated readings, and the fact that they're showing us exactly what we expected to find would be an incredible coincidence if it turned out to be faulty equipment. The neutrino story, on the other hand, made about as much sense as this. That bumped up the chance of wrongness there.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Digitalistically Speaking (profile), 11 Jul 2012 @ 10:10pm

Shoulda went with a Monster cable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rekrul, 11 Jul 2012 @ 11:42pm

Some astrophysicists say they've discovered a filament of dark matter between two galaxy clusters about 2.7 billion light years away. This filament of dark matter appears to be around 58 million light years long, and the astronomers were lucky to find two galaxies oriented in a way that allowed them to measure the effects of this dark matter trail.

You know... All these space-based discoveries that scientists make, which are based on them measuring minute bits of light, are kind of like me discovering a swinging door in China by measuring wind patterns in the US.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Jul 2012 @ 1:05am

old joke
A Higgs Boson walks into a Church.
The priest says "We don't allow Higgs Bosons in here!"
The Higgs Boson says "But without me, you can't have mass!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DCX2, 12 Jul 2012 @ 8:29am

Higgs field, not boson!
I was under the impression that the Higgs field is what gives objects mass. But the only evidence of the Higgs field that we have is the Higgs boson.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]