NC State Senator Admits Broadband Companies Wrote His Bill & Says He 'Carries Water' For Companies
from the wow dept
Ah, North Carolina. A year and a half ago, we wrote about an attempt by the North Carolina state legislature to pass an anti-municipal broadband bill in the state. These bills have become somewhat common. Basically, cities that feel that giant broadband companies aren't providing quality services often decide to build their own local offering. Since broadband is often a monopoly or a duopoly of critical infrastructure, having a local community create another option makes tremendous sense, when done right (though, admittedly, many don't do it well). Yet, the big broadband players tend to spend tons of money fighting these community competitors, rather than actually providing better/faster services.What was most interesting about the situation in North Carolina, however, was how blatant state politicians were in highlighting that it was really the broadband companies who were calling the shots. In our story from April of 2009, it was noted that when the state representatives sponsoring the bill were asked questions about it during a committee hearing, they asked Time Warner employees to answer for them. Think about that for a second. The sponsors of the bill couldn't answer the questions, so they asked industry folks to answer instead. We had thought that was about as blatant as a politician could be in admitting that the bill was actually written by the industry and that the politicians didn't even understand what they were sponsoring.
However, now it appears that a North Carolina state Senator may have taken that even further. Ars Technica points us to a local news report by WCNC, who asked bill sponsor Senator David Hoyle if the bill was written by cable companies:
When the I-Team asked him if the cable industry drew up the bill, Senator Hoyle responded, "Yes, along with my help."That's going to look great on a campaign poster from a competitor in a future election. While none of this is surprising -- the fact that lobbyists write the bills and politicians simply shuffle them forward -- is nothing new, it is surprising to see a politician so willing to admit it. Perhaps he forgets that it's not just the companies who pay taxes (and, for the most part, these big companies are really good at avoiding taxes), but the citizens of the state who vote for him (or not) who pay taxes as well. Flat out stating that he's "carried more water than Gunga Din for the business community," may make the citizens wonder whether he was elected to represent companies like Time Warner (not based in North Carolina) or the actual citizens who elected him.
When asked about criticism that he was "carrying water" for the cable companies, Hoyle replied, "I've carried more water than Gunga Din for the business community - the people who pay the taxes."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: broadband, david hoyle, muni broadband, north carolina
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
We have complained often and the most honest answer we got was that it is not worth the time or money to improve the lines because there is no competition.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's true for us. But there are plenty of right wing voters out there who think that the politicians should be helping businesses. Politicians run (and win) on pro-businessmen platforms all the time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
As I have said many times before, the hate on the LEFT is the real problem in America. They divide and separate everyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
As I have said many times before, the hate on the LEFT is the real problem in America. They divide and separate everyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
This is sarcasm, right? Please tell me you're making fun of the people who think that the REAL problem is the other guys, and THEIR side is great and does everything right. I have a singking feeling you're actually being serious though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
but that's just because I'm of the opinion that the USA doesn't actually have a viable and meaningful 'left' ...
(certainly not if the polices they try to Export under a supposedly 'left' government are any indication...)
a less bias and humourous take, however, agrees with you. the problem isn't that one side or the other sucks. it's that the people believe that the current sides are meaningful and that either are capable of NOT sucking... and that such broad and all encompassing 'sides' make a scrap of sense in the first place.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Um...I'm not sure what definitions you're looking at, but that's definitely not true for "c corporations" (as opposed to "s corporations" or LLCs).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This moron is forgetting the residents to pay property taxes, sales taxes, gas taxes, annual car taxes (paying tax on the same vehicle multiple times, for some reason. As if paying the sales tax at time of purchase wasn't enough for these greedy mongrels).
I live in NC. Guess who I won't be voting! And guess who I'm going to tell my wife, her family and everyone else that I can about this morons corporate ball cupping and total disregard for individuals. That's right, David Hoyle! Have fun not getting elected, jerkoff!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I think the rationale is to help pay for the wear on the roads.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
we get to pay taxes on our taxes :S
(there's a tax on petrol to cover wear and tear on the roads, but because of how the GST (a consumer tax) works, it includes the petrol tax in the price, so you get taxed on that too. and now they're introducing an emissions trading scheme, which amounts to an environment tax most of the time. the impression i get on that one listening to both sides is that it's a nice idea, terribly implemented.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
$
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: $
Isn't that why Americans fought a small revolution starting in 1776? Some tax or other?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: $
I'd say the vast majority of the populous is in that situation in most of the western world these days, in reality, no matter what the paper work says. some more than others and the USA seems particularly bad for a country that makes such a big deal about democracy...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Duly Noted on Wikipedia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Just as you will not vote for a Republican, neither will anyone who is a Tea Party member vote for a Democrat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah to he11 with business
Look folks, I know you don't like to hear this but if the government were running your ISP A. It would be a monopoly still, except it would be the scariest ugliest kind imaginable. B. You would still be using dial up.
Politicians like to tell you they can fix everything so that you'll vote for them. Honestly they fix nothing, because then where would their power be?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Yeah to he11 with business
Let me point you to the Rev Adam Smith who penned a small volume called "The Wealth of Nations". I think, though I can't be sure, that it's out of copyright and in the public domain now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Yeah to he11 with business
I am anti-career-politician, however.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Yeah to he11 with business
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Yeah to he11 with business
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Yeah to he11 with business
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Yeah to he11 with business
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Yeah to he11 with business
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
it was unpleasent.
then again, most of the characters were slime and the main character was completely unaware that it could possibly be different.
he was also about to con a bunch of people into helping colonize venus Before terraforming it (necessary. someone had to be there to do the work to get the terraforming Done). (hey, he worked for an advertising company. what do you expect?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It is important to note the the City Council lobbied both Time Warner and AT&T extensively to get them to improve their service, even offering to partner with them and both flatly turned the city down.
One other interesting thing to note is that Hoyle is not seeking another term. Any ideas where he will end up? TWC, perhaps?
http://jackbetts.blogspot.com/2009/12/sen-david-hoyle-retiring-at-end-of-term.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
and the department of Homeland security works for Disney. What's your point?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why Hoyle isn't in a jail cell in NC is the big question to me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A solution to this is a "By My Own Hand" amendment.
By My Own Hand Amendment:
All bills submitted to congress shall be drafted in longhand English on controlled and logged serially numbered paper sheets provided by Congress in ink with pens held only by the hands of elected and seated members of Congress. The drafting of said bills may only be performed within two single exit 150 square foot Drafting Chamber rooms accessible only to members of Congress. Each Drafting Chamber will be provided by, guarded and monitored by the respective Sergeant at Arms of each chamber of Congress. With the sole exception of doctor prescribed medical devices, the respective Sergeant at Arms shall not permit electronic or mechanical devices within each Congressional Chamber's Drafting Chamber.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]