Is The Contract Cast Members Sign To Be On Survivor Covered By Copyright? CBS Thinks So...

from the copyright-survivor dept

Eric Goldman points us to the news that CBS sent a DMCA takedown to Scribd after the reality TV site RealityBlurred.com uploaded a copy of the contract castmembers sign before being able to go on the show Survivor, as well as a copy of the "rulebook" they receive. CBS apparently claimed that both of these were covered by copyright. Thankfully, RealityBlurred filed a counternotice, claiming fair use due to its use for reporting and commentary -- leading to a scary two week period where CBS would have to sue if it wanted to keep the document offline. However, the two weeks passed and CBS did not respond to notification from Scribd, meaning that the Survivor Contract and the Survivor Rulebook are back online. And, of course, in true Streisand Effect tradition, this attempt at taking down this info has only served to generate even greater interest in what's in the contract and the rulebook. As an aside, while I can see the copyright claim on the rulebook, I think CBS might have more trouble getting a court to recognize copyright on a contract that contains little creative work.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: dmca, survivor
Companies: cbs, scribd


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Sep 2010 @ 4:56pm

    Copyright is supposed to replace contract law. So we have a contractual replacement system that puts contractual replacement restrictions on the copying and reuse of contracts.

    Uhm... if copyright didn't exist can we have a contract that puts restrictions on the copying and reuse of a contract.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    Atkray (profile), 3 Sep 2010 @ 6:16pm

    Re:

    Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Sep 2010 @ 6:23pm

    Censorship by A Company

    This is all about censorship by a company. Censors just want certain information removed out of the public gaze. CBS would have used any other law available to it, not just copyright, to achieve its censorship aims. The real question is, "Why was CBS trying so hard to censor this information?"

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    TDR, 4 Sep 2010 @ 5:24am

    Re: Re:

    "Just wait 'till I get going! Where was I? Australia. You must have suspected I knew the powder's origin, and so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me..."

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. icon
    Danny (profile), 4 Sep 2010 @ 2:08pm

    Selling one's soul to the devil (AKA) CBS

    Wow, are those contracts/releases one sided! Of course they are written by one side, the one with all the power in this relationship.

    I guess any adult can sign a contract like this if he/she really wants to appear on the show. There must be many nasty family situations when other adults refuse to sign their release. It isn't at all clear to me that the relatives' release is binding in any way as it is not clear what consideration passes to them to make it a contract.

    The release for kids to sign is just obscene. Not only does there appear to be no consideration passing to the kids, but the CBS lawyers know full well the signature of the minor is not binding in any way.

    Sheesh.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Storyteller, 4 Sep 2010 @ 11:23pm

    Re: Dizzying Intellect

    Inconceivable!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. icon
    harbingerofdoom (profile), 5 Sep 2010 @ 7:02am

    Re: Re: Dizzying Intellect

    you keep using that word.
    i do not think it means what you think it means...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. icon
    Jay (profile), 5 Sep 2010 @ 5:38pm

    Technically I don't think it has to be creative to be protected... just original...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Michael, 7 Sep 2010 @ 5:27am

    Network Contracts

    Actually, network contracts are pretty creative.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    michael ps, 5 Nov 2011 @ 8:51am

    Re: Network Contracts

    and so are movie studio and most big entertainment contracts.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.