Murdoch's Reporters Allegedly Listened To The Voicemails Of Hundreds
from the the-sort-of-journalism-that-needs-protectionism? dept
While there had been earlier reports of how some reporters for Rupert Murdoch's News of the World had spied on members of the royal family by listening to their voicemails, new reports suggest this activity was endemic, impacted hundreds -- and that Scotland Yard failed to let many who were victims of such spying know about it (and even focused their investigation on just one reporter, rather than looking into whether or not it was a widespread practice, as it apparently was).Although Coulson has long insisted he knew nothing about the illegal activity, sources who worked at the tabloid told the Times Coulson not only knew about it, he actively encouraged it. A dozen former reporters said the hacking was so pervasive at News of the World that everyone knew about it. "The office cat knew," one longtime reporter said.This is the kind of "reporting" that needs to be protected?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: eavesdropping, rupert murdoch, voicemails
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
This *is* the kind of reporting that needs to be protected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This *is* the kind of reporting that needs to be protected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This *is* the kind of reporting that needs to be protected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This *is* the kind of reporting that needs to be protected.
Why the hell should they be treated with anything other than complete and utter indifference?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This *is* the kind of reporting that needs to be protected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This *is* the kind of reporting that needs to be protected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So far, that assumption has always been proven correct, and I'd hope that the rest of the world tries to do the same - especially with anything associated with Murdoch. Sadly, judging by certain political factions in the US, some people are falling for their tricks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And hopefully they keep on falling ... a long long way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
and were these new reports a result of people illegally spying on Murdoch's staff as well?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I do know "Two wrongs don't make a right" (but three lefts make a right!) and "A hypocrite is ALWAYS wrong AT LEAST half the time!", but does it really matter that the guy who steals from others while touting his companies' practically religious moral standards has no ground to stand on and has invaded the privacy of countless numbers of citizens and you are questioning those who brought this to light? Really?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Someone is illegally spying on someone who is illegally spying on someone who hopes that they can catch the person being spied on do something illegal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
You need to check a dictionary on the difference between irony and sarcasm.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/irony?jss=0
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@13
+------+
+------+
+------+
++++++
facing north
you turn left
then you turn left again
then left again where are you?
NOT as the one poster said "3 lefts are a right"
but behind your original self those you could
say "3 lefts leave you behind yourself"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
However with all the power he has, judges seem unwilling to actually harm him. Sued skype for looking like "sky" and he won. He was sued later for giving away music illegally with a newspaper and he paid a few pence every CD, nothing when individuals are charged hundreds of thousands per CD.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]