Woman Sues Facebook After Getting Banned
from the that's-not-how-this-works dept
Michael Scott points us to a story of a woman who not only drove from Maryland to California to go to Facebook's offices to complain about having her account banned, but (when that didn't get the account reinstated) then she sued the site for the ban. Facebook says she was banned for harassing others. The woman, Karen Beth Young, says she was just promoting causes she was interested in, and, in doing so, friending lots of people (about 4,000 by the time the account was closed). She claims the ban violated her constitutional rights... and the Americans with Disabilities Act.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: access, ada, free speech, lawsuits
Companies: facebook
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ADA Title III
However, where it gets sticky is if Facebook qualifies under Title III as a "Public Accommodations (and Commercial Facilities)". It depends if Facebook uses so-called "public data" and has been working to erode the idea of privacy. Is Facebook a "Public Commercial Facility"?
Point is, there have been cases where ADA was interpreted that companies do have to make a reasonable accommodation. Handicapped Parking, at most every store, is a result of some case in the past.
If it really bugs her, she should start a new Facebook using a Facebook Clone Script. If Facebook comes after her for infringement, it would be much more interesting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ADA Title III
This is not an ADA issue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ADA Title III
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Subject
Having a "mental illness" doesn't give you the absolute right to harass others. Otherwise, celebrity stalkers would all have the legal right to do so.
Do not be fooled. She thinks she knows precisely what she's doing. She probably has spent her entire life believing that she knows how to control and manipulate everyone, and she probably also knows exactly how to exploit her "mental illness" in order to try to get the things that she wants. She probably also loves playing the "mental illness" card in order to have her bills paid for by taxpayers. However, the games that she's playing are not based in reality and are all in her head, and when the "head" world comes in contact with reality she can then conveniently plead "mental illness" card and "oh poor me, I'm sick, boo-hoo. stop discriminating against poor helpless sick me."
She's taken it upon herself to wage this manipulation and control game on everyone that she knows and comes in contact with. However, the question remains -- she thinks she's managed to manipulate and control everyone so far, does she have the ability to actually control and manipulate a judge? This is another part of her game.
This is going to be interesting. I'm sure that with all the attention she's getting, she's savouring the spotlight and is getting an immense thrill out of believing that she's controlling and manipulating the public.
Blah. I know these types all too well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Subject
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is something to watch
There are several cases of interest. One most notable is National Federation of the Blind v Target.
http://www.dralegal.org/cases/private_business/nfb_v_target.php
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is something to watch
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is something to watch
Forcing other users of a website to tolerate the harassment of a bipolar woman is not.
The ADA doesn't cover giving mentally disabled people carte blanche to harass people and blame it on their condition.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.fredericknewspost.com/sections/news/display_comments.htm?StoryID=97839
Sounds like a common loon with no problem in unfairly attacking anyone she doesn't like.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Bad news: this chick seems like the kind of person who would incessently Google herself. God help us all if she turns up here....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And it doesn't say that whatsoever
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No, it's not a "Freedom of Speech" question.
Sorry, but this isn't a "Freedom of Speech" question. She's petitioned the court for an ADA and accessibility question. And yes, in America you do have the right to petition the court, even for wacky things. Filing pro se for a case like this isn't too smart.
As for the barriers, I don't know what she's asking Facebook to do. But a Forbes article reports "She used the site to help promote her cancer awareness efforts and freely admits that she friended people she did not know in real life but who she thought would be interested in the cancer awareness cause." This caused her account to be banned. This is weird, because it seems to be exactly how Facebook is used by many PR groups, businesses and bands.
http://blogs.forbes.com/kashmirhill/2010/09/01/maryland-woman-sues-after-being-banned-by-faceboo k/?boxes=Homepagechannels
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No, it's not a "Freedom of Speech" question.
But the complaint is claiming it is (Page 6 line 8)
"Facebook has violated Plaintiffs First Amendment civil rights by ..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Just forward to 4chan and be done with it....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Indeed. I just ran a query against my comment database, and there are no less than 180 comments about something regarding being bipolar. I hope each and every one of those people get banned. Those screwballs. The whole lot of 'em!
Wait, let me revise that to 178. In the 180th comment, someone said that "Kentucky was Bipolar", and another ass was calling Mike out; saying that he practices "...the usual bipolar claptrap...".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
5303 Algonquin Trail
BTW PrometheeFeu, my psychiatrist has no trouble with me and "severe" has two e's
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 5303 Algonquin Trail
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: 5303 Algonquin Trail
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What is the real issue?
She has no intent to re-start a new account. I can understand why Facebook would keep that from happening. Still, using ADA as a way to get your information is weird, even a bit wacky. If the nutcases want their info that badly and drive cross-country and then file a case under ADA, there's a gap. So should data portability be expected and/or legislated?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A little blurb about ADA in schools vs business
Special Ed accommodations apply if the school receives federal moneies. Bipolar disorder is considered a disorder and it would need to be documented how it ultimately translates to a learning disability. If your an educator in a charter or private school, it's possible that ADA accommodations may not necessarily apply. Bipolar disorder is considered a disorder recognized by DSM and it would need to be documented how it ultimately translates into a learning disability for
As for any accommodations in an education environment, it would be worked out in the student's IEP or Individual Education Plan.
See:
http://www2.ed.gov/parents/needs/speced/iepguide/index.htm
In this situation, it may still fall under Title III. If she has a claim, I believe it would fall under the Office of Civil Rights jurisdiction, and not Ed.gov.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www2.ed.gov/parents/needs/speced/iepguide/index.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
get a life lady
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yep, she's fekkin' whacked
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ADA
> "does not provide reasonable accommodations
> to individuals with disabilities
Oh, please. The ADA does not require that a company allow mentally ill individuals to harass their other customers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Harassment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Best wishes, Karen
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Always copping my truths
I kind of get the feeling like I'm being used
And now I realize that you never heard
One goddamned word I ever said"
Mean something.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Facebook Account Deletion
Account Deletion Lawsuit
Current case pending in California District Court
Write to - mskbyoungblog@aol.com
Current blog information at -
http://facebookaccountdeletion.blogspot.com/2011/02/facebook-account-deletion-lawsuit.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Facebook Sucks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]