DailyDirt: In The Year 2525...
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
Computers have made it easier and easier for people to create incredible amounts of data -- passing the zettabyte barrier in 2010. The growth of data is actually surpassing our ability to store it, and it's a bit concerning that our ability to store digital information for long periods of time isn't too reliable (just try to access stuff on a 5.25" floppy). Here are just a few interesting links on preserving information for thousands of years.- Digitally-stored information about nuclear waste needs to be accessible many thousands of years from now. Engraving the info on sapphire discs with platinum is just one proposed solution that could work for future archaeologists -- but in what language should it be written? [url]
- If you thought your burned CDs/DVDs lasted forever, think again. But if you still want to store your data on plastic discs, there's a company (Millenniata) that sells an optical disc engraving technology for writing CDs/DVDs that work with standard CD/DVD readers -- and that claims to last for about 1,000 years (or at least hundreds of years). [url]
- Neanderthals were making cave paintings over 40,800 years ago in Spain. How much of our art will survive the next 40,000 years? [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: archaeologists, archive, data, neanderthal, storage
Companies: millenniata
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
art in 40,000 yrs...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: art in 40,000 yrs...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: art in 40,000 yrs...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Also, just the changing formats over the years will make accessing data from multiple sources a nightmare even if the media itself survives for thousands of years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
In kindergarten, my school had an Apple III where we learned how to program lines in to make art.
In my Junior and Senior years in high school, I had my father for both Chemistry courses offfered. We used an Apple IIe to simulate the molecular breakdown of objects in acid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Regardless, I think this argument is completely moot. It is not like people are relying on these pieces of old media. Everything I had on floppy (and CD-R, etc.) is currently on hard drives. You will find there are many modern archives for ALL old forms of electric media. Is is not static. The data will continue to move as we do. It is silly to worry about old media "dying out." If you think I am wrong, just check out the emulator scene.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I'm definitely old enough to have used 5.25" floppies... and perhaps the ones I still have in a closet are readable, but I don't have the appropriate hardware to access the data anymore (though I'm sure someone out there still has a functional Atari 800XL with an external floppy drive).
Regardless, if you think floppy disks are reliable media, more power to you. I agree that really important data will be transferred to new media formats, but wouldn't it be nice to have a media that was designed to last? Printing on acid-free paper seems more reliable than burning a CD/DVD, and there *should* be a solution so that digital info can be stored as long as printed books (without having to transfer media every few decades).
I'm not sure what your argument really is: do you think that people *shouldn't* be trying to come up with better kinds of long term digital storage? Personally, I think it's a pain to transfer data from one format to another, so if someone comes up with a cost effective way to "store it and forget it" -- I'd like to know about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
5.25" floppies are still readable in modern machines with DosBox and this:
http://www.deviceside.com/fc5025.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I have a USB Micro (3.5") floppy disk drive and through using DosBox on my Windows Vista Machine I can play Wheel of Fortune.
I can also emulate 68k Macintosh software. But you need a physical storage device in order to get a proper dump of the software.
So in preservation we still need the physical objects the data is stored on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I've been using floppies since they were 8"... and none of them read anymore. I've boxes of 5.25" mini-floppies (the proper term for them)... and almost none of them are readable. I've boxes upon boxes of 3.5" micro-floppies (again the proper term)... and very few of them are readable. I'm no kid, and yes indeed, the old floppies are NOT very resilient.
Most of my CDRs that are more than 5 years old are only partially readable, and only a few of the 10 year-old CDRs can be read at all. In fact, the most resilient storage medium I have found is... my audio cassettes. Most of them still play fine after 35 years. My VHS tapes are probably about as good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
of course not... do you have available to you readers for that format ?? again, that would be yes..
does it look like there will be any time soon when you will not be able to purchase readers of that format ? NO...
is it impossible to take all your readable floppies, and burn them onto a DVD or a CD or onto a USB memory ? ie to convert it onto a more modern media, without loss of data ?? YES..
does the capacity of modern media increase with time, are you now able to put the contents of many 3.5" floppes onto a single CD, and copy that CD every 5 years ?
you could probably read the contents of your old floppies and re-write the data onto the same disk and reset the gradual magnet degridation !!
the language you would use is iconography and mathematics.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Regardless, you complete miss the point. It doesn't matter than eventually they will become unreadable. No one is relying on them to be! The data moves as we do. All that data from old floppies, etc. is now on hard drive. When we move beyond hard drives, the young people of that day will be whining that soon all hard drives will be unreadable! Well, so what? The data from it, isn't. It's a stupid argument.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Practically none if copyright has it's way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It just doesn't matter
It just doesn't matter
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Last Question
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
or just put a skull on a stick, seems to work for most people..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
More likely, when someone digs them up in the future they'll be used to found a new religion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
do you think they will be able to use that information to advance their lives ?? really..
nuclear waste, do you not think they would have the technology to determine potential risk of radioactivity in 2000 years, possibly even more advanced than we have in 2012 ?
in the year 2525, you'll be able to store the entire knowledge base, all art, all music, all movies, maps and the earths phone book of era 2012 in the scretch pad memory in your watch.. with several million terabytes to spare..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The works of Plato
The works of Aristotle
The dramas of Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides, Aristophanes
&c
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lost Ancient Art
How many roman murals (only 2000 years old) still exist? They could have survived, as pompeii shows, and as pompeii also shows, the roman cities were full of them. And not only murals, but statues as well. An awful lot, surely more than 99%, were lost and destroyed in the meantime.
So just because the material (and the information) could theoretically survive several thousand years doesn't mean it will.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
2025 headline
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Storing information
Why should it be stored digitally? We have known, proven methods of preserving information in large quantities over thousands of years. Just look at the Dead Sea Scrolls. Written in Hebrew thousands of years ago, then dug up and read by people who speak Hebrew.
Why shouldn't we be able to do something similar with English, and no high technology required?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you thought your burned CDs/DVDs lasted forever, think again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If you thought your burned CDs/DVDs lasted forever, think again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]