Nokia VP Compares Android To Peeing In Your Pants To Stay Warm
from the a-turn-of-phrase dept
It's no secret that Nokia hasn't really done that well in capturing the modern smartphone market. With the proliferation of iPhones and Android devices around the world, Nokia has seemingly stumbled quite a few times. Even if it's made some cool phones with good software, it hasn't really captured the public imagination. This has resulted in some people asking if Nokia wouldn't be smarter to just adopt Android itself, and give up on Symbian. However, a Nokia VP (who's actually leaving the company) reportedly responded to such a question by claiming that phone makers who embrace Android are like young boys who "pee in their pants" to stay warm during the winter. In other words, such a strategy may have (very) short-term benefits, but can lead to much bigger problems in the long run. I'm not sure that's actually true, however. And, from a company that hasn't been achieving much of anything on this front for quite some time, I doubt that those who have embraced Android sense that they're just wetting their pants right now either...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I've found it very interesting that there is been a flurry of negative yet irrational and silly articles in the press lately against Android just a Microsoft is getting ready to release its Windows Phone. Coincidence? (Insert you favorite conspiracy theory here.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Clearly Bill Gates is a Templar bent on using multiple Windows OS's to gather enough information and power to take over the world, bringing about Revelations and damnation for all....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Why didn't I guess this already? Of course the Rapture will be a Windows application. Duh!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
so what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: so what?
Android is something you run in an attempt to flee Nokia's incompetence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: so what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
thus, for a handset manufacturer to rely on Android means that, yes, right now they'll see sales right now, because Android is better than both Meamo or Bada; but the long-term cost is that the same handset manufacturer is relegating themselves to being an OEM in the future.
for a much better and much more in-depth version of this argument, see Tomi Ahonen's blog, stating with this piece here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I was going to post: I've had an Android phone since the Nexus 1 came out, that's one hell of a long pee, but I feel so warm.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
People didn't like that with Microsoft I doubt they will be willing to do a redo with Nokia at the helm.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
"
I don't understand your point here. Maemo currently offers more freedom to developers than Android and Meego will offer even more freedom to manufacturers as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The only worrying things about switching to Android (from Nokia's perspective) should be the patent issues HTC faced and lack of internal expertise, both of which are pretty minor compared to sticking with Symbian and continuing to bleed customers while hoping that Meego will save them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: forking Android
The sense I've gotten is that Nokia is caught in a bureaucratic gridlock having been disrupted by the new entrants in the mobile market over the last ~3 years. I'm not sure it makes sense to bring in a veteran of another large bureaucracy that is only used to being the dominate player in a market in order to right this ship.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: removing foot from mouth
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Why would they do that when Maemo already surpasses Android and iPhone in many areas? The platform may not have the developers or market share at the moment, but as Meego fills in the gaps and applies the polish expected with Android and iOS then it may end up the only true smartphone platform. While iPhone developers struggle to even get their apps on the market and Android developers reinvent the wheel for every little thing, Maemo can already run pretty much the whole Debian repository of software with the only hold backs being user interfaces (apply QT) and hardware limitations (Moores law).
As Meego ties together development for tablets, netbooks and phones while giving developers tools to make application portability as painless as possible, the platform has the potential to do stuff none of its competitors can. All it needs is for people to jump on board. If Android damaged Meego in any way it was by being a hype killer. There was so much hype around Google doing a Linux phone, the fact that it was just barely Linux was glossed over.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Are you sure...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Are you sure...
If you were a consultant, you would advice Nokia to imitate HTC? You would be a poor consultant, my friend. Nokia is the world's mobile phone market share leader. They have nothing to win by producing commodity hardware on top of Android. Their shareholders would skewer them for giving up on the key battle - for a winning OS.
Now, I agree that Nokia currently sucks, and probably won't succeed at producing a relevant smartphone OS for 2010, but a "long shot" is the right play to call. The alternative is just giving up.
I agree entirely with the VP's metaphor of "peeing in the pants to keep warm". They need to build a fire instead...but can they?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I tend to disagree with his comment though as computer manufacturers still seem to be able to sell profits even though they don't own the operating system. It is a nice trick that Apple can compare their computers and OS to Microsoft and insult Dell or Gateway. Then again, what is Apple's market share?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
No, they want to control their implementation. The Meego platform is governed by the Linux foundation, not Nokia. For Nokia this means that their hardware can be mixed with their software for the least amount of effort and no strings attached. It makes more sense for Google to want to control the platform as they don't make phones.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good Thing He Is Going
Nokia had better start appointing executives who make good decisions, otherwise they are doomed. Steve Jobs is going to take the high end away from them and the Chinese are going to take the low end away. When Jobs and the Chinese meet up, bye bye Nokia.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good Thing He Is Going
Nokia would only be accelerating it's own demise if they jump into the Android crowd. Because in that world, high end is still taken by Apple, and low end taken by the Chinese.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why must everything be about Apple? This is article about Nokia's dissing Android developers! And, BTW, I think that North America represents a pretty significant market, especially for higher-end hardware. Yes, we do have blinders on, where we forget the rest of the world, but if Nokia's not feeling the pain right now, why would they bother to talk about 'Droid at all?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's a new world out there.
This new reality seems to be something Nokia wants to ignore.
Android is a more open version of Apple. They're the Windows/Linux equivalent for phones. They are another alternative to Nokia's mediocre shovelware. They will be something else that people flee to when people get sick of Nokia's bad interfaces.
I am one of those Nokia refugees. I'm really not surprised by their attitude here. They are a dinosaur too slow to realize the comet has already hit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's a new world out there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's a new world out there.
I don't see how that follows. Nokia have nothing developed for Android; if they entered the market now then they would be at a severe disadvantage against those who have invested in the platform.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The Smartphone market is very quickly beginning to look like the PC market in the 90's.
A commodity OS (Windows) that can run on any PC completely dominated the PC market against Apple's all in one solution with limited flexibility but in some cases better usability.
Hardware makers utilizing windows had the further advantage of not having to mess with the overhead of developing and maintaining proprietary operating systems (combined with other factors) allowing them to bring systems to market at lower price points.
Of course this is a over-simplification of the history of that market however it is quite easy to see some stark parallels.
What will be interesting is how the fragmentation problem finally shakes things out. At least with Windows you had one code base and one unified OS. Android being OSS makes for many different flavors across the market. Whether this will ultimately hurt Android or simply be a stumbling block remains to be seen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
No, it isn't. It's about the OS strategy that Nokia chooses in order to maintain the highest shareholder value possible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nokia / Symbian
With that said, it makes me wonder why this article is even newsworthy. Mike usually reports on much better stuff.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nokia / Symbian
Apple is all Linux except for the COCOA(interface mainly) thing the rest is all Linux.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Nokia / Symbian
The only thing that makes OS X remotely close to a Linux distro is its use of a GNU userland.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Nokia / Symbian
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_(operating_system)
It says there it is build around XNU that uses elements from FreeBSD.
Inside the Mac OS X Kernel
http://chaosradio.ccc.de/24c3_m4v_2303.html
So to settle this I will just say it is POSIX compliant LoL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
mmmmmmmum
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: mmmmmmmum
HAHA, you're right. That's such a great analogy.
Pissing on your leg to keep warm as a metaphor for Corporate Quarterly profits. But really... it's spot on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nokia is not able to advance easily.
But Nokia is definitely falling behind - the graphics are poor and the user interface is poor.
They have some big bonus though:
Ovi Maps is free (and accessible with no data plan)
The sound quality is fantastic
They offer lots of extra's for free.
Too bad all the 'extra' stuff that is free is surrounded by such a poor designed interface and sub standard graphics.
The other problem is that new (and hip) developers are going iPhone market. So the best apps are first coming on the iPhone and then the Android. Nokia's poor graphics and user interface does not make a good platform for these nice new fancy apps. My nokia has a front and back facing camera but Video Skype is no longer support on my Phone and Nokia's WiFi Video calling software has a piss poor membership and lack up cross software calling.
My current Nokia does everything I need of it and I do not need an expensive data plan to use those features. I COULD by a iPhone or other smart phone but my monthly cell bill would double (plus taxes). Not worth it in my books - I can live will a little clunky user interface and I have my iPod Touch for playing games on the go.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nokia is not able to advance easily.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Nokia is not able to advance easily.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
With you 100% there. The phone in general just annoys me. The last thing I want to do is spend more time messing with it.
'Games' on a phone don't cut it for a long-time gamer like myself. I don't want to play Tetris or whatever silly little games they make for them.
Just give me a simple phone that works. I have a Blackberry, only because work provides it. The email's ok I guess, but I only use it if I have to. I'm pretty apt to just shut the phone off and toss it in the console of the car half the time anyway. If I'm not home, chances are - I don't have the desire to be on the phone anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I used to believe that texting was a passing fad, I used to believe that social networking was a waste of time for B2B companies. I didn't understand those things because I was not in the target demographics. I still don't do those things much but now I understand the value and where things are going.
We are undergoing a major shift in how people go about their lives. Change is a constant but things are moving mobile, moving to the cloud. Companies are working on systems that will decide what needs to be done locally and what can be done in the cloud. With that, a mobile devise will be more powerful than any desktop computer. Things are changing and I believe that the Nokia exec doesn't want to get turned into tomorrows Dell. I can understand that thinking. Android is an open system and Apple is a closed system. I think that both will prosper but Apple will keep their high end and end up with marketshare about what they have with their computers. Is that a bad thing? I don't think so. I doubt that Jobs really wants 100% of the marketplace, I think he is very happy with a small market share at very high profit levels. With their margins, they don't need volume, they just need to capture that high end, which they are quite adept at doing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Thanks. Anything to please you!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
All their in-house OSes suck, but if they get on board with Android, they will enjoy short-term growth, at the expense of long-term marginalization to commodity vendor in a market crowded with cheap Chinese vendors.
This is an existentially important quandary for Nokia - the biggest player in a massive industry - and at the heart of their current struggles, their shrinking market share, even worse market revenue share, executive turnover, and stock price.
And you write it off as nothing. You, sir, have outdone yourself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Apple got all the parts for their iOS from other places they just put it together in a better way and added some new cool things they didn't develop something from nothing and that is what will be needed to recreate a new symbian, besides Apple also reduces its cost collaborating in open projects that free them to work in other aspects of their software stack, Samsung is doing something very similar and others are starting to realize that too.
Apple and Samsung have thousands of employee's they don't need to pay and that will deliver the best they can do for free how will Nokia beat that having to develop everything expending more and not being able to keep up with the other players?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
When you say:
"Android and iOS has already beaten Symbian there is no arguing there and to hold on to a looser is risky."
You imply that I would advise them to stick with Symbian in their battle against iOS and Android. Nothing of the sort. I wrote directly above, "All their in-house OSes suck." Not exactly a strong endorsement.
I think Nokia needs to radically clean up shop, get rid of pretty much everything, and start from scratch. Hire the best people, take advantage of the best freely available open options out there as starting points, and get rid of the Chinese walls between hardware and software. In so doing, they might produce a mobile OS worthy of 2010-2015.
That said, I don't think they will, but I think they should.
Your suggestion that they adopt open platforms and "skin" them is a weak differentiator, and quite possibly delivers negative value to the end user. Do users really benefit because Motorola offers "Motoblur", SonyEricsson offers "Timescape", and HTC offers "Sense" on their phones? Or is that just a desperate attempt to avoid commoditization on a commodity product? All three skins do pretty much the same thing, but have different looks. And all three just make it more difficult for developers to make compatible widgets. And worse, all three just make it far slower for the phone owners to get valuable system updates from Google.
I don't see how inserting negative value into the Android device value-chain is a good long-term play for Nokia. They need to deliver the next best thing. The next iPhone.
I agree completely when you write, "Apple got all the parts for their iOS from other places they just put it together in a better way and added some new cool things they didn't develop something from nothing and that is what will be needed to recreate a new symbian." Nokia should do the same, with the advantage of doing it 4 years later.
Nokia is the industry's 800 pound gorilla. If they did something good, they have the market power to dominate. Sadly, that's a big IF.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Change is inevitable
Men make history, and not the other way around. In periods where there is no leadership, society stands still. Progress occurs when courageous, skillful leaders seize the opportunity to change things for the better.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Something I wrote in July
I disagreed vehemently, with the following comment:
[Yes, Nokia's Maemo and Symbian aren't up to par with leading mobile OSes, but adopting Android] ...is only better than the status quo: Nokia cannot survive by offering second-rate, years-late mobile OSes that are notably inferior to the best-in-class. Adopting Android would be far better than this.
However, if you do look at who the big winners are (and you mention them) they are Apple and Google. The key to being powerful in this new ecosystem is NOT in hardware, but rather in owning the OS, the service layers, the application marketplace, and the user mindshare. Adopting Android is tantamount to “throwing in the towel”. For a boxer, this only makes sense if it avoids an inevitable beating, and so, too, for Nokia.
No, they had better bet the farm on owning a top notch integrated hardware/software experience, just as Apple does. And I agree that (given recent performance) this is anything but a slam-dunk, even at a 15% probability of success, it’s worth the chance.
And we don’t have to look far to see a similar industrial model: The PC industry is very informative to the current smartphone value chain. The hardware ALWAYS quickly becomes a commodity, while the OS, applications, and service layers retain value and profitability. Apple has shown that in PCs as well as phones, an integrated quality experience can command a high profit. Gateway, Compaq and a hundred dead PC companies shine a contrasting semaphore for H/W commoditization woes.
And the tragedy of this all is that Nokia was very early to spot the importance of owning and participating in the service layers above the OS. They have tried various strategic initiatives since year 2000 (Symbian, Maemo, Preminet, Club Nokia, Ovi, Navteq…) to be an important part of the software and apps sector, but have never had a slam-dunk. Perhaps it is because all their efforts have always been partial, disjointed, and they have never bet “all the marbles” and lined their formidable resources around a single effort at winning.
Either way, Android, for Nokia, is admission of defeat. And their shareholders would skewer them for throwing in the towel this early in the fight.
Derek Kerton
http://www.kertongroup.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Something I wrote in July
Apple got onboard with Linux and was suscefull in differentiating themselves from the normal Linux distributions, and the iOS is the same thing why can't Nokia do the same?
Because of some perceived "loose scenario" that is...is...is something LoL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Something I wrote in July
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Something I wrote in July
I hope he wasn't talking about Meego, cuz then he'd be a fortune teller.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nokia has twice the smartphone market share of Apple
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Their Linux phone is the bomb
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Their Linux phone is the bomb
The main difference between Meego and Maemo is that Meego is better. I have Maemo on my N900 and plan to replace it with Meego ASAP. I often use the bash shell and will continue to do so in Meego.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]