Doctors Sue Blue Shield Over Rating System
from the free-speech-ain't-free dept
It appears some California doctors are not at all pleased with a new doctor rating system launched by Blue Shield of California and have launched a class action lawsuit against the insurance company. Blue Shield notes that the rating system uses "nationally recognized measures of care," and the data itself comes from doctors groups, health plans and purchasers. Of course, the real question is whether or not a rating system like this can be against the law. After all, it's an opinion. In many ways, this lawsuit reminds me of lawsuits against Google from people who don't like their rankings. Such lawsuits have not gone far. Blue Shield has every right to express an opinion about a doctor, and in this case does so based on a variety of well-accepted measures. I can understand why doctors who don't perform well might not like it -- and I can also see potential problems if the data creates incentives for certain behavior that is less helpful for patients -- but that doesn't make expressing an opinion illegal. Hopefully the courts will recognize that, or we may get a very bad ruling on the books that says that giving an opinion is not allowed if some people don't like that opinion.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: doctors, free speech, opinions, ratings
Companies: blue shield of california
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
From the quote "An opinion is like an as..."
I would agree companies have a right to express an opinion. However, this opinion is based on measures and data, and if these are not available for review, or clarified to the reader, then they're no longer opinions but measures.
This one's a fine line indeed, but I'm siding with the physicians on this one *unless* Blue Shield:
-States its an opinion
-Provides the data to form this opinion
-Clarifies the information to the readers
Mike, this type of "opinion" would similar to those who are against you (though really Techdirt) all the while having not read Techdirt to form their "opinion".
That's not what I'd call an opinion. Would you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: From the quote "An opinion is like an as..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: From the quote "An opinion is like an as..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: From the quote "An opinion is like an as..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: From the quote "An opinion is like an as..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: From the quote "An opinion is like an as..."
What are you talking about? An opinion is an opinion - regardless of you informing someone that it is an opinion.
"Mike, this type of "opinion" would similar to those who are against you (though really Techdirt) all the while having not read Techdirt to form their "opinion"."
And you are suggesting it should be illegal to give an uninformed opinion? From this post alone, the police will be at your door shortly. Probably mine too. If you could sue everyone that says "this website sucks" without them showing the data they used to come up with it, we would be in pretty bad shape as a society.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: From the quote "An opinion is like an as..."
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but that's wrong in every aspect. All opinions are based on some sort of facts. Generally they way an opinion springs into existence is through a entity possessing enough information to come to a conclusion one way or another, but not enough information to say definitively. For instance, if I state AMD processors are better than Intel processors, it is based on years of technical experience, many products tests through out the years, cost analysis, etc. Of course, that would still just be my opinion because I didn't cite enough evidence and have had that evidence 3rd party reviewed to make it a proven fact.
This review system isn't a bad thing and is just an opinion. There should be tons more review systems out there to balance out any bias though. The reality here is that they don't like being measured. Just remember, doctors can be just as bad as insurance companies, after all, they are doing it to make money as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: From the quote "An opinion is like an as..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: From the quote "An opinion is like an as..."
This is not an opinion (at least not in the defamation sense).
Defamation opinion is a very narrow category. Blue Shield will have to be careful how it publishes these measures (as well as what the measures actually say).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Do you REALLY want an Insurance Company rating Doctors?
Health Insurance in this country already sucks, but having the Insurance Industry rating the Doctors seems to be about the worse idea that I have ever heard.
Their ONLY incentive is to increase their proffit margins by as much as possible, so it would seem that their incentive would be to rate the doctors that have the lowest cost claims at the top rather than the doctor that has the best medical practices.
The absolute LAST place I want to trust a rating on a Doctor would be a For MASS Profit company who's incentive is to make money from the medical claims.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Do you REALLY want an Insurance Company rating Doctors?
However, allowing lawsuits against people that express an opinion you do not like is going to stifle a lot of important speech.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Of course, that will never happen because professional organizations never enjoy highlighting their crappier members.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I want to see ratings for politicians too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This lawsuit is a dead loser
Debate the useful of these ratings all you want, but from a legal perspective, there's nothing to argue about here: The ratings are Blue Shield's opinion, period.
Josh King
General Counsel
Avvo, Inc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Class action lawsuit against Blue Shield
I don't practice that kind of law anymore, but I still have a feeling for it. One of the links says:
"The program was developed by Blue Shield and the Pacific Business Group on Health, a coalition of 50 purchasers that is also involved with the California Healthcare Reporting Initiative, ..."
It goes on to claim "consumers" and "doctors" as a sort of catch-all (standard "don't watch my right hand, watch my left hand" trick).
I've never heard of Blue Shield being philanthropic; "Oh, you will die without X, let us pay for it!". I have heard of them being tough business people (too tough, IMO).
What I think we see is a "drop your rates or we will smear you" campaign. That is, and should be, illegal. Unfortunately, it is also almost impossible to prove, and BS knows it - so yes, it likely won't go far.
Poor ol' BS - feel sorry for them; well, actually, not!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]