More People Thinking About Smart Copyright Reform
from the about-time dept
With the entertainment industry constantly pushing for ever more draconian changes to copyright law, it seems we're finally seeing some pushback from folks who are extremely knowledgeable about copyright law and its impact. From that, more and more suggestions are popping up, saying that copyright reform really needs to go in an opposite direction. In the last year alone, we've already highlighted proposals from Jessica Litman and Public Knowledge with suggestions on how to reform copyright law. On top of that, William Patry has indicated that his next book will be all about how to fix the copyright system. Now, apparently, we can add Pam Samuelson's voice to the group. SF Gate has a short article by Samuelson highlighting the problems with copyright law today, and then suggesting some ways to fix the system. Apparently, she's about to release a larger report, called "The Copyright Principles Project: Directions for Reform," which will "explore 25 ideas for copyright reform." Once that comes out, we'll be sure to spend some time going through the proposals, but it's great that some of the brightest minds in copyright are all starting to converge on the need to fix copyright law, rather than just keep ratcheting it up.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, copyright reform, pamela samuelson
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
RCP
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, I'll pass on reading it then.
Anything other than this makes it open to abuse, no matter how well it gets "reformed".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well, I'll pass on reading it then.
Copyright is, and has always been, a turd.
So don't polish it, abolish it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well, I'll pass on reading it then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"about copyright law and it*s* impact."
Delete this :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'd say it was the dimmest minds in copyright that were all starting to converge on the need to fix copyright law, not the 'brightest'.
You don't fix an instrument of injustice. You abolish it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good news
There is one simple reform that would solve about 90% of the copyright problems in our country today: get rid of statutory damages for non-commercial infringement.
The moment that rights holders actually have to prove their financial losses, they are sunk. Things like the Righthaven or Hurt Locker lawsuits would be eliminated overnight.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good news
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good news
Here are some more ideas ...
Remove the instant copyright and allow 1 year from publishing to actually have to register a copyright or else it goes into the public domain.
Charge to copyright.
Limit copyright to 30 years (15 year with a 15 year renewal) after which it goes into the public domain.
Define fair use. Also allow the rights holder to expand the definition of fair use when copyrighting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Missing the Original Intent of Copyright
By failing to get back to the basics of copyright in her article, Ms. Samuelson does not provide us with good entry point for arguing how copyright can be improved. For example she makes the statement that: "Moreover, virtually every firm today has some copyright asset it wants to protect, such as a logo, an advertising motif, software, databases or website content." The preceding statement is not a valid use of copyright; so if a pundit allows it to pass as an acceptable use; how do we refute it???????
[ link to this | view in chronology ]