Winemaker Charles Smith Sues Over Anonymous Blog Comments
from the hello-ms.-streisand dept
Venkat Balasubramani sends over a link to Felix Salmon's story about winemaker Charles Smith's decision to sue some anonymous blog commenters for libel. The comments in question were in response to a blog post by W. Blake Gray, describing an evening with Smith, who one could describe as "a character." In the comments to Gray's post, many anonymous commenters were pretty critical of Smith, claiming that he was more of a promoter than a winemaker, and multiple people discussed a specific alleged episode where they claimed Smith was... well... what you might (charitably) say was especially rude to someone. An employee of Smith's at K Vinters did respond in the middle of the comments, defending Smith vehemently (while also complaining about Gray). As Salmon notes, the entire 29 comment thread died out within a week, and most people would go on with their lives hardly knowing a thing about it or about the claims concerning Charles Smith.Instead, Smith decided to sue the anonymous commenters for libel, and since Gray's blog is hosted by Google, it received the subpoena, and has agreed to hand over the names, unless Gray tries to quash the subpoena -- something he does not appear to be interested in doing. Now, reading through the original comments, there might be stuff in there that's defamatory -- though, it seems like a long shot. For the most part, it's clearly just people venting, and I would imagine that anyone reading those comments would take it as such. However, by filing the lawsuit, and calling that much more attention to the issue and the lawsuit, just in an attempt to "out" the commenters, it seems that Smith is now calling a lot more attention to what people think of him and (at the same time) making it clear that he also reacts in a legalistic way when someone doesn't like him. It would seem that Smith comes out looking less favorable in filing the lawsuit than in just letting it go. As multiple people noted "this suit is a prime example of how not to handle criticism."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: anonymous comments, charles smith
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Just left this comment on his/their blog....
I'm a wine drinker, and while I prefer French/West Coast wines, I'm always on the look out for good producers in the Midwest, since I'm from Chicago. You look like a charasmatic person, but....
Seriously, suing anonymous commentors is pretty disheartening. Even if what they said was wrong, even if it might be actionable, it's still usually not the right thing to do. For instance, the only reason I even came across your winery and this site is because of the story on your lawsuit (at techdirt.com of all places), including to Google, to out anonymous commentors. I'm a huge first amendment supporter, so you can imagine the light this type of thing casts for me, and others, on you and your business.
I hope you'll reconsider, for the sake not only of our national traditions, but for yourself as well.
Sincerely,
Timothy Geigner"
Site is: http://kvintners.blogspot.com
Then I got the lovely response: Your comment will be posted pending moderation.
Yeah, right....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Just left this comment on his/their blog....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Just left this comment on his/their blog....
A good Syrah from the North Midwest? Please....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Just left this comment on his/their blog....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Just left this comment on his/their blog....
Washington State. Not Wisconsin.
WA is the second largest producer of Quality wine in America.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Just left this comment on his/their blog....
You get no points for correcting me after I already corrected myself.
That is all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just left this comment on his/their blog....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Just left this comment on his/their blog....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Just left this comment on his/their blog....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lawsuit as proof
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"If they're suing for it, then it's most likely true."
People don't usually care to deny gross exaggerations. They usually try to hide things about their past that they *have* done but are ashamed of.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]