Apple Trash Talking Spotify As It Prepares Its Competitor
from the all's-fair-in-love-and-competing-with-steve-jobs dept
There's yet another rumor going around that Apple is getting ready to launch a subscription music service. That's been rumored for ages, and it would be surprising if the company didn't do it. In fact, many were surprised that after Apple shut down music locker Lala that it didn't immediately launch a cloud based subscription offering. But, perhaps more interesting, is the fact that Apple has also been spending time trash-talking Spotify to music industry execs. We had mentioned, when Apple shut down Lala, that it would be a good time for Spotify to figure out how to launch in the US. The company has been trying for quite some time now, and the record label demands are basically impossible to meet. And it sounds like Apple is encouraging that. As Greg Sandoval reports:In meetings in Los Angeles recently, Apple executives told their music industry counterparts that they had serious doubts about whether Spotify's business model could ever generate significant revenues or profits, according to two sources with knowledge of the discussions.Ah, the amazing ridiculousness of confused short-term thinking. While I also have questions about Spotify's ability to generate significant revenues long-term, the recording industry is making a huge mistake if it buys into the idea that Spotify is likely to cannibalize digital sales. If you look at reports in places where Spotify is widely available, such as Sweden and the UK, the reports suggest that what Spotify actually cannibalizes is unauthorized downloading. Yes, there are a bunch of reports that suggest Spotify gets people away from The Pirate Bay and into a system that at least gets the labels some money.
But Apple executives worried about the effects of a free music service might have on the rest of the market. They noted that it's tough to sell something that someone else is giving away, the sources said. One industry insider said it is only logical that if Spotify were allowed to launch a free-music service here, at a time when Nielsen recently reported that the growth of digital sales has flattened out, it could eat into the businesses of proven revenue-producers like Apple and Amazon.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cloud, music, streaming
Companies: apple, spotify
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Spoti--who?
But I'm confused. Is spotify an Android program?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Erm, isn't that exactly what Apple's been doing since they launched iTunes? Weird how they forget that particular narrative when it suits them, yet it's been the industry's mantra of how iTunes and the like would never work.
"If you look at reports in places where Spotify is widely available, such as Sweden and the UK, the reports suggest that what Spotify actually cannibalizes is unauthorized downloading."
You mean that people who don't want to pay 99p/track will actually use a legal service if it's more reasonably priced? Shocking.
I also can't help but notice that the complaints seem to focus on the "free" part of Spotify without mentioning that there's actually a 3 tiered subscription model with various extra benefits to encourage payment (such as the ability to store playlists on your mobile phone while offline with the premium service). The free service only gives you 20 hours/month.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's real unfortunate that Spotify is not available in the US
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What's the good thing on Spotify that everyone continues to talk about it?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Spoti--who?
Anecdotally, I agree with the last paragraph. I basically never download music now. I don't need to, I can get pretty much anything I want through Spotify.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I liked Grooveshark's price ($3 month for VIP) but I listen to music 80% of the time on my Droid (hence why I paid for VIP) but was VERY upset when I realized that only some songs were available over 3G (e.g., some required wifi.) Now, I couldn't find this info anywhere on Grooveshark's site, or on the android app's page- though I did find mention of it in the user comments. I can't come up with a logical reason that some songs were 3G enabled and other weren't, but I canceled my subscription within 30 minutes of discovering it. Also, Grooveshark's selection is.. well, messy.
I eventually settled on Mog.com-- their android app is closer to beta than I'd like, but the selection is good. The $10/mo price point is pushing it, though. ($5/mo if you don't want phone use)
I fully plan on trying Spotify when (if?) it is released in the US.
Oh, and how did Mog.com change my music habits? I no longer pirate music, as there's no need to. I only ever listen to music on my phone or on my computer, both places I just use Mog.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]