Lawyer Tries To Prevent Yale From Using Photo Of Joe DiMaggio & Marilyn Monroe On Book About The Two
from the this-is-not-what-ip-law-is-about dept
Copycense points to the news of how the executor of Joe DiMaggio's estate is threatening to sue Yale University Press for using a photo of DiMaggio with Marilyn Monroe, with whom he was famously (if briefly) married, in a book about DiMaggio's relationship with Monroe. Morris Engelberg, who has been an aggressive protector of DiMaggio's image since his death is claiming this is not allowed:"We will not authorize any photo of Joe DiMaggio and Marilyn Monroe ... to be on the jacket of any book," he responded in a letter dated Sept. 28. "This was a 'no-no' in Mr. DiMaggio's lifetime," the attorney wrote.The thing is... it's not clear that DiMaggio (and now Engelberg) actually have the right to prevent that. Think about it: if a newspaper simply was reporting on DiMaggio and Monroe, and snapped a photo of the two, that's perfectly legal. So why wouldn't the same be true for a book. While this is only at the "threat" stage, so it's not clear what laws Engelberg would actually rely on, you'd have to imagine it would be yet another attempt at using a publicity rights claim. As we've been discussing lately, publicity rights have suddenly become quite popular, and the law around it is really troubling in how it prohibits all sorts of speech. Right now, of course, publicity rights law is very much in flux, and dependent on various state laws and ever changing caselaw. My guess is that Engelberg might be more bark than bite, because losing a lawsuit like that could have some pretty serious consequences.
"We have respected Mr. DiMaggio's wishes that there be no commercial or other venture depicting" Joe and Marilyn.
While it might not be entirely relevant, this threat reminds me of the story we had a couple years ago about an attempt by Marilyn Monroe's estate to use a publicity rights claim. Apparently, her estate had convinced California tax authorities that Monroe was a New York resident, to avoid paying taxes on the estate in California. The problem? New York's publicity rights laws only applied to living people, not dead. California has posthumous publicity rights. So, when the estate tried to claim California publicity rights, it was rejected, because of the whole "NY resident" thing. The ruling there basically said Monroe no longer had publicity rights. So that doesn't bode well for Engelberg's threats... though I'm guessing that DiMaggio probably qualified as a California resident (despite playing for the Yankees, he was famous as a San Francisco native), so perhaps that's what he's banking on.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: fair use, joe dimaggio, marilyn monroe, morris engelberg, publicity rights
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
So much wrong here, before even get started.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
what's so special about this photo?"
Nothing at all, except there's lawyer involved who will try to use the legal system to steal some money from Yale.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Joltin' Joe
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This has been encountered before...
"Four 1950's cultural icons (Albert Einstein, Marilyn Monroe, Joe DiMaggio and Senator Joseph MacCarthy) who conceivably could have met and probably didn't, fictionally do in this modern fable of post-WWII America. Visually intriguing, the film has a fluid progression of flash-backs and flash-forwards centering on the fictional Einstein's current observations, childhood memories and apprehensions for the future."
Except they didn't use their names,and they are called The Professor, the Actress, the Ballplayer, and the Senator, respectively. Could this have been because of action from the same legal front?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Publicity Rights Fiasco
The family of James Dean will not agree with this position, but can't they come up with another way to generate revenue?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"aggressive protector of DiMaggio's image"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Publicity and Reporting
Wait a second...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
California Residency
From what I can find online, including a few search results from Google Books, it appears that DiMaggio was a Florida resident when he died. One book mentioned he established Florida residency when he was younger for tax purposes. Since he died at his home in Florida, I would imagine he probably was still a resident at the time, though I don't have a definitive source that proves it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I vote for privacy!
[ link to this | view in thread ]