The Owner Of A Site That Tracks Reports Of Bedbug Infestations Threatened By Upset Hotel Owners

from the let-me-introduce-you-to-section-230 dept

Rose M. Welch points us to a report from Poynter about the site Bedbugregistry.com. As you might have heard, there's been a lot of attention paid to bedbug infestations lately, and that site is often cited by journalists covering the story. According to the Poynter report, hotel owners have often threatened to sue the site because they don't like seeing their hotels on the list. I'm sure they don't, but it's disappointing that the Poynter article doesn't point out that the operator of the site, Maciej Ceglowski, is protected by Section 230. That seems like an important element of the story. As it is, it kind of suggests that a hotel owner could have a lawsuit. While they could file one, it's unlikely that it would get very far, due to the clear safe harbors in Section 230.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: bedbugs, infestations, liability, safe harbors


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Bradley Stewart, 19 Oct 2010 @ 5:49am

    These Hotel Owners

    should have no difficulty determining if their establishments are infested with bed bugs. All they have to do is check every room and if they see little bitty ladders propped up against the sides of all the beds they have a problem.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Dark Helmet (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 5:59am

      Re: These Hotel Owners

      Sounds like those hotel owners....

      *Puts on glasses*

      ....could use a vacation.

      YYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAaaaaahhhhhhhh!

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Gabriel Tane (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 6:05am

        Re: Re: These Hotel Owners

        ::face palm:: ::passes beer::

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Gabriel Tane (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 6:06am

        Re: Re: These Hotel Owners

        or...

        I guess you can say that the site really

        *puts on glasses*

        BUGS them.

        YYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAaaaaahhhhhhhh!

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Dark Helmet (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 6:07am

          Re: Re: Re: These Hotel Owners

          Did you just copy/paste my "YYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAaaaaahhhhhhhh!"?

          link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2010 @ 6:21am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: These Hotel Owners

            YYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAaaaaahhhhhhhh, he did.

            link to this | view in chronology ]

            • icon
              Gabriel Tane (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 6:29am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: These Hotel Owners

              Damnit Anonymous, you beat me to it!

              Yes DH, I'm a lazy bastard.

              link to this | view in chronology ]

              • icon
                Berenerd (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 6:38am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: These Hotel Owners

                YYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAaaaaahhhhhhhh! i smell a trademark case coming up...or copyright...or perhaps RIAA will want some royalties

                link to this | view in chronology ]

                • icon
                  Dark Helmet (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 6:44am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: These Hotel Owners

                  That'll be....a million space bucks....

                  link to this | view in chronology ]

                  • icon
                    Jay (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 6:50am

                    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: These Hotel Owners

                    I have two Space Babes and a rocket ship.

                    link to this | view in chronology ]

                  • icon
                    Gabriel Tane (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 7:02am

                    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: These Hotel Owners

                    A million!? That's unfair!

                    link to this | view in chronology ]

                    • icon
                      Dark Helmet (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 7:10am

                      Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: These Hotel Owners

                      Unfair to the payor, but not to the payee. But you're going to pay it...or else....

                      (okay seriously, this has to end, because I could do the whole movie....)

                      link to this | view in chronology ]

                  • icon
                    Gabriel Tane (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 7:24am

                    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: These Hotel Owners

                    A million!? That's unfair!

                    link to this | view in chronology ]

                    • icon
                      Gabriel Tane (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 7:25am

                      Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: These Hotel Owners

                      Oops! Sorry for the duplicate! Hit the refresh button on the wrong screen. my bad!

                      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2010 @ 6:03am

    The thing I don't get is why reports things that matter to people are being treated by the law, if it is true get a report that says so from someone credible and send it to the website.

    The website should put not only the reports of bed bugs but the legal threats send by some stabilishments so people can think about what kind of place is that, that don't want to deal with bad knews.

    I feel that people are trying to destroy quality control.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Christopher (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 5:43pm

      Re:

      Good point. Personally, I am more pissed that the hotels are not taking issue with the ACCURACY of these reports, which means that they must be true.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    EAH, 19 Oct 2010 @ 6:28am

    This is actually kind of important

    I live in Ohio. #1 in the country for bed bugs (we're #1! Go Ohio! Yay!!) And I travel overnight once a week within the state. I've been very fortunate not to have experienced any infestations yet, although my partner, who also travels out at least one night a week, has. I can tell you that exterminating bed bugs is intrusive, expensive, long, and arduous.

    Even if you are not in Ohio, check out that site if you are going to stay at a hotel. Even if it seems stupid to you, it is a lot less stupid than trying to get rid of the damn things.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      RD, 19 Oct 2010 @ 7:44am

      Re: This is actually kind of important

      "I can tell you that exterminating bed bugs is intrusive, expensive, long, and arduous."

      Yes it is, they are very persistent and hard to get rid of. One thing that helps tremendously is a product called diatomaceous earth. Its a fine powder that, once the bugs walk through it (the only drawback, they HAVE to traverse it at some point) it cuts up their exoskeletons and kills them within 48 hours. Use a paint brush to spread it thinly around your bed area especially, and any other area you see signs. Also, if you are able, wrap your mattresses in plastic and seal them. That cuts 90% of the infestation right there, as they tend to try to breed and feed within the mattress. Good luck, they are disgusting creatures and more than just pests.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Johnny, 19 Oct 2010 @ 6:43am

    Do they really need safe harbor protection...

    for stating a fact? The only way the hotels could win anything is if bedbugregistry.com is spreading lies. Telling someone that the hotel is infested with bedbugs, when in fact it is, is not against the law and there is nothing the hotels can do about it.

    Something like this shouldn't even get to the judge, much less the courtroom. And threatening to sue just for the sake of scare tactics should be just as illegal as threatening bodily harm.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      jfgilbert (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 7:19am

      Re: Do they really need safe harbor protection...

      The web site only publishes reports by other people. The owner of the site cannot check all posts for veracity, that's why they need safe harbor protection. The responsibility for the veracity of a report is with the author, not with the site owner, that's what section 230 is about.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Michael, 19 Oct 2010 @ 7:21am

      Re: Do they really need safe harbor protection...

      Nope.

      Actually, bedbugregistry.com could be full of posting that are complete lies added just because patrons were not happy - or even postings from competing hotel owners and they would still have no case.

      Since bedbugregistry.com does not post anything, it is the users that would have to be the targets of any lawsuit - that is the point of section 230 - to place the blame on the person that writes the comment rather than the website that that are writing the comment on.

      Lawyers that bring lawsuits against the wrong party should be disbarred.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2010 @ 7:45am

    New York has always been an armpit of a place. The right armpit of America. The only city with cockroaches bigger than rats.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2010 @ 8:22am

    Safe Harbor?

    Safe harbor protection applies to service providers who cannot be expected to have any control over the content posted or exchanged by others. The service that they provide is sufficiently large and diverse as to warrant safe-harbor protection.

    The bedbug registry site has established itself as an authority on bedbug infestations and the owners have invited contributors without any oversight. Given that the site is small and focussed on only one subject, the safe-harbor defense may not apply.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2010 @ 8:24am

      Re: Safe Harbor?

      [Citation Needed]

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      duffmeister (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 9:01am

      Re: Safe Harbor?

      Is safe harbor protection really that specific? If so anyone could argue it doesn't apply to anyone......


      I am now off to research safe harbor provisions in law.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike Masnick (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 10:13am

      Re: Safe Harbor?

      Safe harbor protection applies to service providers who cannot be expected to have any control over the content posted or exchanged by others. The service that they provide is sufficiently large and diverse as to warrant safe-harbor protection.

      That is simply not true. Section 230 (and the associated case law) says absolutely nothing about the size of the service, or even whether or not it is possible to control the content. In fact, it says the opposite.

      The bedbug registry site has established itself as an authority on bedbug infestations and the owners have invited contributors without any oversight. Given that the site is small and focussed on only one subject, the safe-harbor defense may not apply.

      Can you point to a single bit of caselaw that supports that claim? There is none.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    bob, 19 Oct 2010 @ 9:10am

    It's all a Matter of Degree

    infestation
    1. To inhabit or overrun in numbers or quantities large enough to be harmful, threatening, or obnoxious.

    I would say one bed bug bite would be obnoxious.
    Who here is old enough to remember bed legs put in kerosene so as a mote was created to keep them off the beds?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Angry Puppy (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 9:44am

    Bedbugs are Here

    My neighbor runs a pest control company and told me that practically every hotel in North America has bedbugs. Most hotels regularly spray and eliminate the pests, but hotel guests continuously bring them back in.

    I'm guessing the complaining hotels are the ones that do not spend much on exterminators.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Christopher (profile), 19 Oct 2010 @ 5:45pm

      Re: Bedbugs are Here

      Hotel guests bringing them in? I think not. I have looked in my home, and I haven't been able to find these pests. I'm also NOWHERE NEAR what you would call a 'neat freak' either.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.