Months Later, Defense Secretary Gates Reveals Wikileaks Document Leak Didn't Actually Reveal Intelligence Sources
from the so-much-for-that dept
Back when Wikileaks leaked tens of thousands of documents on the Afghan war earlier this year, the US government went into full out assault mode against the organization, accusing it of all sorts of things, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates claiming that the leak had compromised "intelligence sources and methods," leading others to claim that Afghani informants were being killed over the leaks. That became a common theme, and we had numerous commenters insist that such informants were being killed. For many, it's now considered fact.Turns out... it's not. The very same Robert Gates has now admitted that it turns out no intelligence sources were revealed. The same article quotes a NATO official as saying that "there has not been a single case of Afghans needing protection or to be moved because of the leak." Of course, considering how widely reported the claims of such leaks were, many will continue to believe it's been proven as fact, despite the very same person who kicked off the rumors now admitting they weren't true.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: intelligence, robert gates, wikileaks
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Don't worry, I'm sure the DOD will begin spreading FUD before they actually conduct the detailed review, as they just admitted doing with the previous leak.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Say, what?
Well, now that this is all cleared up let's go ahead and invade Iceland, Switzerland, Lichtenstein, Luxembourg, UC Berkeley and Australia. It's the only way to be sure.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Say, what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Say, what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Say, what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Say, what?
I kid, ha, ha...
Your Snark is stale, maybe you can still use it for stuffing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I guess that's okay then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I guess that's okay then.
The analogous situation would be: you should have been arrested for serial vehicular manslaughter because you were impaired (even though you didn't do it).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I guess that's okay then.
Not far enough.
The analogous situation would be if you got pulled over and arrested for speeding and then the cops slapped you with a vehicular manslaughter charge afterwards. When you protested it, they said you had mowed down 4,553 pregnant nuns that had experienced immaculate conception. Then, six months later, they admit that they just kinda made that last part up, but they were still charging you with vehicular manslaughter because, let's face it, immaculately impregnated nuns need to be protected....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I guess that's okay then.
Condoms are now available in god-sized? I thought he was a Catholic...
(Sorry, hilarious analogy, btw)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I guess that's okay then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I guess that's okay then.
Question: If a God does not believe in himself, is that blasephmy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I guess that's okay then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I guess that's okay then.
Judaism represents the old covenant made with Abraham, and the new covenant made by Jesus through the cross and resurrection is the fulfillment of it. The Christian faith is the fulfillment of what began in Judaism. Some of the most enthusiastic believers in Christ are Messianic Jews - Jewish Christians who practice the Hebrew traditions and who have also accepted Christ, understanding that he is the true fulfillment and focus of those traditions.
Helmet, you place a paradox where none exists. And you, like we all often do, keep thinking of God in human terms. But he isn't human, and he doesn't have any of our failings or flaws. He isn't anything like that. He does not change, and he is not bound by linear time. His nature is entirely different from ours. He is more like Aslan of Narnia - good, yet terrible at the same time. Just and wise, yet dangerous. Understand, perfect goodness requires perfect justice.
That's why the law of the Old Testament was given. That and to show us our need for him. And the Son was given on the cross as a way for us to avoid the spiritual death our nature condemns us to, that which the Old Testament law puts us under. Through him we are given a new nature, Jesus' nature, to replace our own. By grace, not by works. Salvation is a gift, given freely to us but paid for with the Son's blood. Like digital files, it never runs out. It's infinite. Becoming more like Jesus is a lifelong process, and all believers fall and struggle. Never believe anyone who says otherwise.
But to get back on topic, this doesn't come as any real surprise to me. DOD is always going to be paranoid about sites like Wikileaks because they see them as a threat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I guess that's okay then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I guess that's okay then.
The song contains swearing and other offensive stuff.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I guess that's okay then.
[Man]: Rabbi, you've got to help me, I don't know what to do. Yeasterday my son told me that-- that he's going to convert to Catholicism. I'm so ashamed, what did I do wrong, did I push him away? Did I hold him too close? I just feel awful.
[Rabbi]: Oh you feel bad. You feel ashamed. Last month my son told me he's going to convert! A fine thing, me a rabbi, and my son is going to be a Christian. How does that look? How do you think I feel?
[Booming voice from the sky]: OH SO YOU'VE GOT IT SO BAD...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I guess that's okay then.
Then again God doesn't need to believe in himself as he trims his beard while looking in the mirror wondering if he should stop believing in Dark Helmets :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I guess that's okay then.
God settled for "Catholic" mostly because it has been around for a while and has been pretty stable lately. It has better support than most too, with a large, mostly friendly community a comprehensive manual (the Holy Bible of Christianity, they call it).
God thought about getting one of those new-fangled OS's with Polytheistic kernels, but none seems to be in working condition just yet (but that hasn't stopped them from bashing their monotheistic competitors, even though their kernel can barely make it past the boot-loader).
God doesn't bother to participate in the OS holy wars that sometimes flare up. He just wishes people would choose what they like best and just get over it. He personally dislikes these new versions of "Christianity" that have been popping up recently. Sure, some of them promise that they solve this and that and that they'll make your life so much better, but generally, they are much more unstable that the mainstream releases. Others haven't had updates for years. And finally, some just seem like one big scam...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I guess that's okay then.
So next time, don’t use inappropriate analogies in your arguments.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They lied?
What haven't they lied to us about?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lies first; truth long after.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Afghanistan
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Afghanistan
[ link to this | view in chronology ]