Court Strikes Down Overly Broad Massachusetts 'Harmful To Minors' Law
from the free-speech-ftw dept
In another win for free speech rights over an overly aggressive gov't attempt to censor, a federal judge issued an injunction barring a Massacusetts law that tried to ban certain works from the internet for being "harmful to minors." The judge noted that since the law did not require that the works be "purposefully sent to a person the sender knew to be a minor," it went way too far. There have certainly been a lot of attempts by governments to legislate parts of the First Amendment away, and it's nice to see the courts still believe strongly in protecting at least that Amendment.![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: free speech, harmful to minors, massachusetts
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Protections
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Protections
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Protections
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Protections
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Protections
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Talk about child exploitation...
Lets just scrap the constitution all together and replace it with the "Super freedom, terrorists are bad, save the children, patriot, we love Jesus, 9/11, eeeMerica! Git er' donestitution"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And I guess that's why we have so many rights being infringed upon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The fact is that it is a TOTALLY NORMAL sexuality that is being used as a 'boogie man' in order to frighten families into thinking that their children are in 'danger' every second of every day.
Yes, I know that children are 'snatched' by pedosexuals, but if you look at things, those are usually the pedosexuals who have TRIED to abide by the laws and end up going insane from lack of sexual gratification.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"What? To get it overused! yah it will be, don't worry"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]