Oprah Sued For Copyright Infringement After Quoting A Book On TV Without Credit

from the taking-on-Oprah,-huh? dept

Thu, Oct 28th 2010 10:39am — Mike Masnick

A guy named Charles Harris, who wrote a political booklet about the process by which America elects Presidents, is apparently suing Oprah Winfrey for copyright infringement, saying that she "plagiarized" his work, when she quoted it on her TV show, without crediting him. Basically, the guy had sent copies of the booklet to Winfrey, hoping to get some free publicity out of it. However, on one show she apparently (he alleges) directly read aloud some questions from his booklet, but did so without crediting him. Of course, plagiarism, by itself, isn't against the law, so he's trying to twist this into a copyright lawsuit, saying she had no license to read the questions aloud. You can see the filing below:

It's hard to see how he can legitimately claim that Oprah reading the questions has caused him "substantial injury, loss and damage to his property" or that it's "damage" for his "business reputation and goodwill." And, not surprisingly, he's asking for the maximum statutory rate of $150,000. Of course, you could (and many probably will) argue that the guy knows the lawsuit is bogus, and that there's no "damage," but is using the lawsuit to get publicity for his booklet...

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: charles harris, copyright, oprah winfrey, plagiarism

22 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Michael, 28 Oct 2010 @ 10:46am

Could go two ways...
Oprah could just pay the guy and make this go away.

Or...Oprah could fight this. Who the heck wants to risk fighting Oprah? That's like picking a fight with Chuck Norris.

One way or another, I think this is going to quietly go away - and we are pretty likely to never hear from this guy again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- :Lobo Santo (profile), 28 Oct 2010 @ 10:50am
  
  Re: Could go two ways...
  Wait wait wait...
  
  Did you just say Oprah is like Chuck Norris?!?
  
  Which alternate universe do you hail from, traveler?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Free Capitalist (profile), 28 Oct 2010 @ 12:53pm
    
    Re: Re: Could go two ways...
    Did you just say Oprah is like Chuck Norris?!?
    
    Which alternate universe do you hail from, traveler?
    
    Now I really want a graphic novel version of Chuck Norris vs. Oprah Winfrey
    
    While each of their powers are formidable, I'm thinking Chuck could lay a real good debunking on her in a street fight...
    
    Might not be Superman v. Green Lantern....
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Michael, 29 Oct 2010 @ 4:32am
    
    Re: Re: Could go two ways...
    All I'm saying is that if Chuck and Oprah got into a fight, the world would collapse into a black hole.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Oct 2010 @ 2:45pm
  
  Re: Could go two ways...
  funniest analogy ever
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Miso Susanowa, 28 Oct 2010 @ 8:23pm
  
  Re: Could go two ways...
  Wait... if Oprah is like Chuck Norris... and you are saying "this is going to quietly go away - and we are pretty likely to never hear from this guy again"... Are you implying that Oprah is going to kill this guy?!?!?!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Michael, 29 Oct 2010 @ 4:33am
    
    Re: Re: Could go two ways...
    It is unwise to say such things about the benevolent Oprah.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Revelati, 28 Oct 2010 @ 10:55am

He is probably dangling from a rope over a sty of ravenous hogs and/or Oprah fans as we speak. Waiting for "she who will no be named" to give the order for him to be lowered down.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Many", 28 Oct 2010 @ 10:57am

And so I do.
Will. Do. Did.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Doe, 28 Oct 2010 @ 10:58am

I predict his next book...
I predict his next book will be about abusing the courts for fun and profit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cowardly Annon, 28 Oct 2010 @ 11:02am

Wouldn't surprise me if he's just hoping Oprah will settle and give him money to make him go away.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pierre Wolff (profile), 28 Oct 2010 @ 11:11am

Attention?
Sounds like this could be more about getting attention. As well, wouldn't this fall into "fair use"...whatever that is these days ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 28 Oct 2010 @ 11:32am

Yet another example...
... of how copyright is an infringement on free speech. If you can't repeat the argument that you're refuting/supporting, you can't speak freely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rikuo (profile), 28 Oct 2010 @ 11:35am

If this is a call for attention
Isn't this a bit stupid? If he is suing simply to get attention for this booklet, it creates a negative connotation with the author. So a random Joe read the newspaper, reads "Oprah quoted some questions and is getting sued".
Do you think random Joe feels like he should buy the booklet?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ron Rezendes (profile), 28 Oct 2010 @ 11:54am
  
  Re: If this is a call for attention
  Random Joe better hope this guy isn't connected to the newspaper or he'll get his just like Oprah! How dare he read, that Oprah read excerpts from his book w/o credit!
  
  If this guy lined his dominoes up before this all started he could sue everyone who even mentions the story!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Oct 2010 @ 12:07pm

It does seem a bit of a stretch, based upon the facts alleged in the complaint, to pigeonhole this matter into any of the six enumerated rights under copyright as stated in 17 USC 104. For example, an allegation is made that the work was "used", and yet "use" is not one of the enumerated rights.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- dnball (profile), 28 Oct 2010 @ 1:37pm
  
  Re: Plagiarism v. Copyright Infringement
  "Plagiarism" is a catchall term that, in certain circumstances, of which this might be one, that includes the legal wrong of breach of an implied-in-fact contract.
  
  There is, in fact, a legally cognizable cause of action for "plagiarism" if the plagiarist appropriated material submitted to the plagiarist by someone who, based on the circumstances, could reasonably assume that the material would not be used w/o permission.
  
  The field of law is "idea submission law" and the cause of action sounds in contract -- NOT copyright as it appears this plaintiff is asserting. See, for example, http://goo.gl/qlJo .
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 28 Oct 2010 @ 5:42pm
    
    Re: Re: Plagiarism v. Copyright Infringement
    You two. Up against the wall.
    
    And no, I'm not going to define 'wall.'
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Atkray (profile), 28 Oct 2010 @ 12:15pm

I can't help but think of the possibility of Oprah pulling out some old dusty booklet that is in fact where this joker got his material from.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Oct 2010 @ 1:05pm

The guy was hoping for a free plug and when she read from his book but didn't get mentioned, he got mad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
CN, 28 Oct 2010 @ 11:19pm

How it should go...
The judge ought to say "This is bogus, wasting the court's time and taxpayer's money. Bailiff, throw this asshole in jail."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A. Consumer, 30 Oct 2010 @ 8:49pm

Guy suing Oprah
I think he should've gotten her permission to use the clip of her reading the questions and used that to publicize his book in a positive way. I would like to know how he got the book to her. I have a book i would like her to read. It might just change her life. it changed mine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]