For All The Cyberwar Talk, Turns Out There Have Been Fewer Attacks On The Pentagon's Network

from the cyberlull dept

Fri, Oct 29th 2010 5:26am — Mike Masnick

For all the recent talk of "cyberwar," with particular emphasis on the idea that hackers in foreign countries were bombarding US gov't and military institutions with constant internet attacks, it now turns out that "incidents of malicious cyber activity" against the Pentagon have been on the decline this year. There still have been plenty of attempts to breach the network, but it's a much lower number than in the past. And that seems to contradict what Pentagon officials have been saying.

Deputy Defense Secretary William Lynn, who's been leading the charge for why the Pentagon should be in charge of cybersecurity, recently claimed that the frequency was increasing exponentially. Except that's not true, apparently. The NSA, who is the main group within the Defense Department that wants to handle cybersecurity, apparently had its boss specifically (falsely) claim that he was "alarmed by the increase, especially this year." Of course, there are still plenty of attacks -- no one is denying that, but it's even more evidence that the folks looking to use this to gain more power are clearly exaggerating what's going on.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: attacks, cyberwar, stats

9 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

fogbugzd (profile), 29 Oct 2010 @ 5:46am

From the Rampantly Paranoid Department:
There are fewer attacks that they know about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Oct 2010 @ 5:47am

The worst agressor in the cyber war was Bradley Manning, that hacker really did it :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 29 Oct 2010 @ 10:20am
  
  Re:
  What about Gary McKinnon
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 29 Oct 2010 @ 10:21am
    
    Re: Re:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4PkNPCEnJM
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Oct 2010 @ 6:52am

@2
no hes the one that got caught
there used to be a hole for over 7 years....that's all i'm saying on a USA blog
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 29 Oct 2010 @ 7:25am
  
  Re: @2
  Sorry I forgot the sarcasm tag.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Prashanth (profile), 29 Oct 2010 @ 6:54am

Doublespeak/RIAA = Coincidence?
Is it really any surprise that they would do this? Also, isn't it a neat (or not) coincidence that the RIAA does the exact same thing - talk a lot about how they are being threatened at every turn yet occasionally admit that they are doing better than ever?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Oct 2010 @ 8:20am

It seems clear that right now various federal agencies are jockeying for position to call "shotgun" for which one of them should assume operational control of a "cyber security" organization. After all, operational control defines which agency would receive funding to create new bureaucracy.

Fortunately, all of this does seem a bit premature since "cyber security" protocols is a basic research study being examined under the auspices of a DARPA program that is using the collective research and engineering expertise of both Johns Hopkins and Lockheed Martin.

I take some measure of solace in DARPA's participation since it is one of the very few federal agencies noted to be at the cutting edge of research into various projects that have led to many of the research advances that have morphed into the development of methods and equipment that today we as a nation take for granted, such as the important role it played in the development of the ARPANET.

At the same time, DARPA has in my experience been one of the very few federal agencies that serve the very important role of honest broker.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TtfnJohn (profile), 29 Oct 2010 @ 9:34am

It's typical, though, of policing and security agencies to set up straw man issues and pound away at them even if there's little or no evidence to back it up.

You gotta admit, though, that "cyber-terrorism" has a nice ring to it. It gets the attention of media and legislators who will go on and on about it while quoting the "experts" that thought the whole thing up.

But what can they do when the data says the Pentagon is getting attacked fewer times now than before?

Take credit for it!

Then tell legislators and the media that they need more cash to keep the trend line going down. Never mind that they've done all of nothing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]