Comcast Buying NBCU Will Lead To Higher Prices... But Is That Really A Bad Thing?
from the driving-folks-to-cut-the-cord dept
I've said from the beginning that I really don't understand all of the complaints about the Comcast/NBCU merger. It's the modern equivalent of AOL/Time Warner, which really only served to hasten people to move away from crappy old solutions. So, when I see a report claiming that the end result will mean higher prices for consumers as NBC jacks up its rates, I'm still not convinced this is a bad thing. As we've seen, there's a growing trend towards people cutting the cord on cable (even if the cable folks are in denial about this). Having prices shoot up even higher seems only likely to hasten the inevitable. You can't raise prices indefinitely if there's real competition -- and the problem is that the TV companies still don't believe (or simply don't realize) that there's increasing competition every day. If NBCU/Comcast really does lead to higher prices, it'll likely also lead to more subscribers realizing that there are alternatives as well.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cable, merger, prices, tv
Companies: comcast, nbc universal
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The comcast/NBC merger will result in some redundancies. Those can be eliminated, increasing profits. Since comcast will have some control over hulu, which is a competitor, it will die a death of five 2-3 minute commercial breaks per show.
Comcast will also begin broadband caps.
We can regulate comcast now, we can regulate them later, or we can accept that we have allowed the 2 time finalist for worst company in America to have more say over America's communications distribution network.
I know you sometimes have to burn the village to save it. I just don't want to be in the hut that's on fire.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If people started building the necessary infra-structure to compete now it would take a couple of decades to finish it. But that is with a tremendous push for it and billions of dollars to do it and with no government interest in building something like that or people organized enough it is not going to happen anytime soon.
It can get silly pretty quickly before it gets any better.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's worse than you might think.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What is your option, Verizon?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Free market
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Free market
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I keep wondering when one of these companies is going to offer me the option to choose which channels I would like. A sort of "make your own package". Do I want 50 of the $1/ month channels or 10 of the $5/ month channels. Etc, etc.
The other thing I wonder about is the offers for new customers only. Loyalty goes unrewarded. It seems backwards.
Offer me the channels I want, let me pick them at a reasonable cost, reward my staying on as a customer and I think you would have a winner. This option would be hard to beat. The competition would be crushed.
Ahh, a person can dream can't they?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
A) Love that quote at the end
B) This is going to be interesting to see what the end results are.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Yep, the Television media and the internet will die. Just dump your TV and Internet, and watch entertainment and the whole economy bury its' own grave. We're better off without TV or the internet. There's a lot of things we need to do.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Little mikee's babble
You sit and babble non stop about "cord Cutters" and yet you offer not one bit of prrof that even one of them has went in the direction you claim. You sit and talk about how Time Warner loses 150k subscribers and then talk about how they are all going to file sharing and onlive viewing.
BUT you offer not one stitch of evidence to back up your side at all.
Here in my area I would be one of your "cord cutters" because I dumped Time Warner. BUT it had nothing to do with going to file sharing or piracy like you claim. I went to FiOS TV. I still have all my same channels and still watch all the same shows. BUT I am one of the 150k people who you claim cut the cords to go to filesharing.
In reality, FINALLY for the first time in history Time Warner has had a reasonably reliable service to compete with and they are losing a large percentage of Subscribers to that competition. The Echonomy may also be catching up with people as well, and a percentage may be forced away from TW for that reason too.
But my guess is a small percentage went to filesharing or any other free online service.
So instead of capitalizing on the fools that follow you's ignorance and playing into their foolish notion that everything is free and they have a right to take anything the feel they do not need to pay for, and offer some proof to back up your babble.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Little mikee's babble
Im not sure what studies there are out there to offer you proof that there is a cord cutting movement, but I'm sure that I am not the only one. In fact I know quite a few people that have opted out of cable recently. Yes we need the broadband connection, but that is the only service that I am using.
There are so many other options out there now for telecommunications that it's staggering. Skype, Google Talk, project free TV, YouTube, and Hulu are just some and more and more keep popping up all the time.
While I fully agree that cord cutters are just a small percentage of the market, I would suggest that they have growing influence, especially in a down economy. During the lean times a lot of free online services will probably be doing all they can to improve their offerings and drawing new subscribers/users, and the snowball effect could be quite devastating to the old players' core business.
Lastly, if you read this blog regularly you would know that Mike does not believe that everything is free, nor should it be. The point is that the technologies in the market are effecting change and the old business models are struggling for survival in court rather than in the marketplace.
I say let the horse and carriage people stick with their model as the cars appear and see what happens.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Really? Doubt it....
I'd also be curious as to how much of things like package-based offerings from TV companies are mandated by content providers. Anyone have an opinion?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Little mikee's babble
thats really smart!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Wrong.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Little mikee's babble
[ link to this | view in thread ]
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2010-11/twitter-chatbot-trolls-web-tweeting-science-clim ate-change-deniers
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Really? Doubt it....
AFAIK, the packaging of content is driven by the content providers. For example, the recent spats between News Corp and others. I imagine that this sort of thinking will dominate the future of such adventures by same into the ISP and content merged environment. I can hear it now ... ads telling me that I can save with a bundle of my favorites, including access to Google, BBC, and NewEgg.
Yes the future is bright and holds promise - maybe.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
forced
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No more mergers, period
NO THANKS!
Just keep your grubby hands to your self concrapcast!!
This will be bad no matter how you look at it... locking what content remains up..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Merger matters because local cable monopolies OWN internet access
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Speeding things up ....
They will then try to put caps on internet service which will be a fail as there will be a huge backlash from consumers. If they do place caps on downloads it will lead to higher prices and more companies and local municipalities entering the market. With Legal battles like the North Carolina's city of Wilson -vs- Time warner happening and eventual federal intervention openning up the broadband arena.
All in all it will lead to more consumer choice, lower costs, and the eventual failure of the cable monopolies. Thats a good thing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's worse than you might think.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Also, if it gets bad enough, Google has a huge chunk of bandwidth with which they could become an ISP overnight.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
You had me up until this sentence. What competition? Oh, yeah, that's why they don't have competitive options, because you have nowhere to go anyway...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Internet turning into Cable
It won't be long before all the big dogs follow ESPN's lead and demand money from ISP's or close off their content.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Internet options
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Merger matters because local cable monopolies OWN internet access
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The real facts on the ground
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Surely you can do something similar over there - i just asked my isp who's supplying their bandwidth and they told me, then i contacted that company and voilla, im basicly ready to start it with me and a few mates.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Merger matters because local cable monopolies OWN internet access
FYI - there is a large percentage of internet users who are not interested in your attempts to morph it into a content distribution platform.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Cord Cutting
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This mentality offends many people. A better way of stating this would be something like, "enticing them to stay".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]