DailyDirt: Listening To Muzak On A Long Space Elevator Ride...
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
Reliable space travel is slightly elusive. Sure, we have a few rocket systems that can take people up to low Earth orbit, but there's always the chance that those rockets will fail and explode in the sky. On top of that, re-usable rockets haven't quite lived up to their promised cost effectiveness, though some progress is being made on that front. A space elevator could provide a nice alternative, obviating the need for explosive chemical thrust to get to orbital altitudes. But where would we put it, if it's even possible to build one? (Maybe on Mars first....)- The International Space Elevator Consortium (ISEC) believes it will be possible to get a kilogram of payload into geosynchronous orbit for just a few hundred bucks... someday. There's still no known material that's strong enough to do the job necessary to build a space elevator, but there are a few promising candidates. [url]
- Graphene might be a suitable material for a space elevator tether, but no one has figured out how to make miles of it yet. Researchers are working on making large-scale amounts of graphene, but it's still in experimental stages. [url]
- There are more than a handful of significant challenges that need to be solved before anyone gets a working space elevator. The most obvious problem is creating the tether material, but there are also vibration issues on the tether, the problem of keeping the tether relatively stationary, possible collisions with all kinds of space junk, the environmental risk of an enormous tether to space, and all the unknown maintenance costs. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: geosynchronous orbit, graphene, international space elevator consortium, isec, leo, space, space elevator, space exploration, space junk, space travel
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
My favourite failure mode?
Let's see your super thin carbon nanotube rope cut right through a thunderhead without frying.
Harvesting electical power from clouds is an obvious thing, so nobody bother to patent in mkay?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Let's see your super thin carbon nanotube rope cut right through a thunderhead without frying.
Remember, this is no mere lightning rod. This is a huge conductor with massive current capacity, extending from the ground right through every level of the atmosphere and beyond.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Let's see your super thin carbon nanotube rope cut right through a thunderhead without frying.
I *love* the idea of a space elevator and perhaps the hurricanes could be resolved by moving the elevator if it's tied to an ocean located point but not sure how you get around the last part.
Someone intent on destroying it is going to be able to get an aircraft and hit the thing. Militarizing it to the point of completely empty airspace seems unlikely at best, especially at higher and higher altitudes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Let's see your super thin carbon nanotube rope cut right through a thunderhead without frying.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Let's see your super thin carbon nanotube rope cut right through a thunderhead without frying.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here you go...
Rice University and the Dutch firm Teijin Aramid have figured out how to make carbon nanotube fibers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"There are more than a handful of significant challenges that need to be solved before anyone gets a working space elevator"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "There are more than a handful of significant challenges that need to be solved before anyone gets a working space elevator"
Now let's consider that there are two ways to counterweight the elevator. The first method is to extend the cable as far out as it is from the earth, so a total length of around 45,000 miles. The other option is to anchor the cable to a small asteroid located a few thousand miles past geostationary orbit. The asteroid would be a more logical choice since it gives you the raw materials for a space station too. Just hollow it out, send the minerals down to earth for processing if they aren't going to be needed in space, and build your station inside it.
Guess what, we'll assume the station is about 5000 miles past geostationary level. Now we're looking at another 20 hours. Basically five days up and five days down. A space elevator is great for getting lots of stuff up into space cheaply. Not so great for getting it up QUICKLY.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: that's still almost 24 hours to get there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]