Wikileaks & ICE Domain Seizures Show How Private Intermediaries Get Involved In Government Censorship
from the intermediaries-matter dept
There have been two big stories this week, both of which have elements of US government censorship of speech. The first, of course, is the pressure put on Amazon to drop Wikileaks as a customer of its S3 storage. The second is Homeland Security seizing a bunch of domain names by getting VeriSign to hand them over. In both cases, defenders of these actions claim they're not censorship, but both appear to involve the US government stepping in and either explicitly or implicitly getting a US corporation to block a form of speech. That's concerning.Of course, beyond the problem that the government would be doing this in the first place is a separate concern: the role of corporations in helping make this happen. Some have argued, in the case of Amazon, that as a private company it has the right to refuse service to anyone. That's absolutely true. But if it's refusing service based on political pressure from those in positions of power, that's still censorship. While I don't buy into the idea that companies like Google and Facebook are monopolies, Ethan Zuckerberg does raise a very good point (talking about the Amazon/Wikileaks situation) about the role of corporate giants as intermediaries that can help a government censor:
If they simply responded to pressure from a US Senator, or to boycott threats, it sends a very disturbing message: that Amazon will remove content under political pressure. Yes, Amazon is within its legal rights to refuse service to a customer… but as I’ve argued previously, they’re a private company responsible for a public space. That’s the nature of the internet – we use it as a space for public discourse, though the sites we use for much of our discussion are owned by private corporations and controlled by terms of service that are significantly more stringent than restrictions on public speech.I'm not as convinced that this is a problem in the web server space yet. There are still other places that Wikileaks can certainly go. But when it comes to domain names, the central nature of companies like VeriSign is at least a concern. It's also why more distributed solutions become a lot more interesting.
The rise of internet hypergiants like Amazon that host servers for hundreds of thousands of clients makes these potential conflicts more clear. If you are dissatisfied with the terms of service of your hosting provider, you can always find another… up to a point. There’s been massive consolidation in the web hosting market, and companies like Amazon are likely to control large shares of the market in the future, both because there are economies of scale in providing low-cost service, and because large server farms can more effectively defend from attacks like DDoS. But if large providers like Amazon won’t take on clients like Wikileaks, they’re forced onto smaller ISPs, which may be more costly and less able to thwart DDoS attacks.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: censorship, companies, free speech, homeland security, ice, intermediaries, internet
Companies: amazon, verisign, wikileaks
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The increasing Intermediary role
http://lawgeeknz.posterous.com/regulating-that-new-fangled-wild-west-interne
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MPAA Statement On Google’s Taking Steps To Address Online Copyright Infringement
http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2010/12/making-copyright-work-better-online.htm l
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It doesn't matter...
Correction: another 10 search engines.
If domain name are confiscated, alternate roots will be set up. Or P2P DNS will be deployed.
If DPI is used, then encryption will be deployed.
If connection throttling is used, then spread-spectrum techniques will be deployed.
If...
All that will happen is that the MAFIAA will continue to rip off artists and creators, enrich its executives and attorneys, and piss away a pile of money in a battle it lost a long time ago.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It doesn't matter...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Subject
I'm sure every penny of tax payers dollars were well spent. ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Want to hit the site? Use the IP address: 88.80.13.160
La-di-da.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
interferrance.
THEN the big biz got into the act. Phara etc, killed traffic.
next up, films and TV. from small supppliers, right?
from cop, to priest to judge.
pre emtive guilties are in line now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]