MPAA Reminding Universities They Need To Crack Down On File Sharing -- Leaves Out How It Lied To Get The Law Passed
from the omissions dept
Back in 2008, we wrote about how the MPAA convinced Congress to pass legislation to make colleges and universities responsible for reducing copyright infringement on campus or lose federal funding. The law was really a trial run of sorts -- an attempt to see how this could work for making ISPs responsible. Of course, in order to get the law passed, the MPAA flat out lied. It made up numbers, saying that 44% of "losses" from file sharing came from college campuses. This number was so ridiculously wrong that the MPAA later claimed "human error" before saying the number was really 15%. But even that was dubious -- and when the GAO asked the MPAA to support these numbers, the MPAA refused to provide the data. Pretty telling.So, the entire law was passed under totally false pretenses. If Congress had any sense of what's right, it would repeal the law. But, instead, the law went into effect recently, and now the MPAA is sending out letters reminding universities that they need to start acting like copyright cops. Of course, they leave out the fact that they got the law put in place by lying to Congress. Funny how they would omit that. So, kids, the lesson of the day is: it's okay to lie to Congress to force colleges to spend money to protect your obsolete business model, but sharing a movie you really liked with a friend is evil. Makes sense.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: colleges, file sharing, universities
Companies: mpaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The way I see it, the MPAA doesn't consider you a customer. They would much rather have you as a tax-payer...paying them regardless to whether you consume their content, but they still want you to pay for their content. They push for compulsive licensing for students, but they still want students to pay for the content. Thus, it won't matter how many customers they have, they still have everyone's money.
And I figure that even if things don't go their way and they loose too many customers, it is just because we are all criminals who are "stealing" their products instead of (what is the truth,) us getting fed up with them and moving on to better things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mafia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Conflicting law?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...wait, that's no thumb...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I can't be certain of course, as I was only about 10 at the time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's the difference
What's the difference between the numbers the MPAA makes up and the numbers you make up? You throw tons of made up numbers around and rarely if ever back up your numbers with facts.
You back up your numbers with links to other made up numbers that have links to other made up numbers. Then you controdict yourself, or worse flip sides faster than a coin toss.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What's the difference
You also need to point out where he switches sides.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What's the difference
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What's the difference
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What's the difference
Today, I have changed my mind. I think you are a moron.
When has Mike made up any numbers? Do you ever read the articles? (that was rhetorical, we know you don't) TechDirt is commentary on OTHER PEOPLE'S INFORMATION. All of the numbers cited came from other sources. Some of the sources have been wrong - and Mike is quick to point out when they are questionable - even if it supports his position.
It is impossible, at this point, to argue that the number they supplied congress to get the bill passed (44%) is at all reasonable - even the MPAA says it was wrong. In addition, they revised it to 15% and refuse to provide evidence. Now, if someone lies, comes back and says they lied, and then says "trust me", do you? If so, would you like to buy a bridge?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What's the difference
Of course he would he is a troll ... they like bridges.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What's the difference
When you start your response with poorly punctuated ad hominem name-calling, all you're doing is holding up a virtual sign that says "I'm an ignorant douche."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What's the difference
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It needs to be completely dismantled and a true democratic government put in it's place. Anyone that thinks the US is a democracy just needs to recite the Pledge of Allegiance. 'To the Republic for which it stands'. Any person that continues to allow any political party to hold the government and the people hostage you are a traitor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now it all makes sense
Why the school didn't just write in their e-mail that they're doing this in order to abide by the law is still a little confusing. I was actually surprised when I got here that downloading torrents was allowed, because I had been used to being blocked at my undergrad campus. Now I can get used to being less entertained by my computer on campus just like I used to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shady
It doesn't really matter what number they used, I am sure they were told to fill in the blank and write the check out to _________ Congressional Campaign Fund.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
HEOA Requirements
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Piracy is not a loss....
Not a loss, but a decrease in sales.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
money probably changed hands
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"MPAA... they got the law put in place by lying to Congress."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "MPAA... they got the law put in place by lying to Congress."
Bingo. That's sharing a movie with your friends.
Sharing 10,000 copies with complete strangers is something else, entirely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "MPAA... they got the law put in place by lying to Congress."
"Feel free to provide a copy of the movie for anyone who requests one. Why? Because we have no moral incentive to giva a crap what the mpaa mafiaa thinks." };)
The philosophy of "Lead By Example" goes right out the window when it comes to the mpaa/riaa and other copyright MAFIAA groups. After all, it's their outdated business model.. including the lies and deception they feed congress. Morals? Screw'em, if they can't handle reality. };P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"A few friends" isn't the problem...
I don't think the issue is about sharing a movie with a friend, nor do I think that would be very evil. Back in the VCR days, people would duplicate a movie onto a tape or two and it really wasn't a big deal, even though it was infringement.
The issue is that people are sharing a movie not with a friend, but with the entire public Internet. That's quite a different situation.
Your main point about how the MPAA lied to get the law passed is a good one. There is no need to weaken the point by suggesting that 'sharing a movie with a friend' is what's going on and is what the MPAA is pursuing. That isn't it at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "A few friends" isn't the problem...
And yet the box office numbers are higher than ever before. What does that tell you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: "A few friends" isn't the problem...
If only people wouldn't to give the movies free publicity by sharing it online, I mean, if only they wouldn't steal the movie.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And these MPAA morons expect schools to take funds out of their already thin budget to act and monitor copyright issues?
Idiots
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Liabilities on providing fase information
[ link to this | view in chronology ]